Suppr超能文献

呼气末正压对非低氧性创伤患者肺内分流和通气死腔的影响。

The effects of positive end-expiratory pressure of intrapulmonary shunt and ventilatory deadspace in nonhypoxic trauma patients.

作者信息

Vigil A R, Clevenger F W

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 1996 Apr;40(4):618-22; discussion 622-3. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199604000-00017.

Abstract

Controversy exists regarding the routine use of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in mechanically ventilated patients. We hypothesized that nonhypoxic patients receiving 5-cm H2O PEEP would have improved shunt and PaO2/F10(2) ratios (P/F), without an increased dead space to tidal volume ratio (VD/VT) versus patients receiving no PEEP. Forty-four trauma patients were randomized to receive 5-cm H2O PEEP (PEEP) or 0-cm H2O PEEP (ZEEP). Shunt VD/VT and P/F were measured at 0, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours after intubation and after extubation. PEEP and ZEEP comparisons used Student's t test and the General Linear Models procedure. Shunt was significantly increased at t = 0 and at extubation in the PEEP group. At extubation, the PEEP group demonstrated significantly higher VD/VT and poorer P/F ratios. After correction for baseline values, no statistically significant differences were noted in spite of a trend toward worsening pulmonary function in all measured parameters. These results suggest that routine use of 5-cm H2O PEEP in mechanical ventilated trauma patients is not necessary.

摘要

对于机械通气患者常规使用呼气末正压(PEEP)存在争议。我们假设,与未接受PEEP的患者相比,接受5 cm H₂O PEEP的非低氧血症患者分流和动脉血氧分压/吸入氧浓度比(P/F)会得到改善,而死腔量与潮气量之比(VD/VT)不会增加。44例创伤患者被随机分为接受5 cm H₂O PEEP(PEEP组)或0 cm H₂O PEEP(ZEEP组)。在插管后0、12、24、36和48小时以及拔管后测量分流、VD/VT和P/F。PEEP组和ZEEP组的比较采用Student t检验和一般线性模型程序。PEEP组在t = 0时和拔管时分流显著增加。拔管时,PEEP组的VD/VT显著更高,P/F比更差。校正基线值后,尽管所有测量参数均有肺功能恶化的趋势,但未观察到统计学上的显著差异。这些结果表明,机械通气创伤患者常规使用5 cm H₂O PEEP没有必要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验