Suppr超能文献

低潮气量正压呼气末肺复张与高潮气量零呼气末正压通气对机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术术后肺功能的影响。

Low Tidal Volume Positive End-Expiratory Pressure versus High Tidal Volume Zero-Positive End-Expiratory Pressure and Postoperative Pulmonary Functions in Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy.

出版信息

Med Princ Pract. 2017;26(6):573-578. doi: 10.1159/000484693. Epub 2017 Oct 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to compare the effects of low tidal volume (VT) and moderate positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with high VT and zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) on postoperative pulmonary functions and oxygenation in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Forty-four patients were randomized into low VT-PEEP and high VT-ZEEP groups. The patients were ventilated with a VT of 6 mL/kg and 8 cm H2O PEEP in the low VT-PEEP group and a VT of 10 mL/kg and 0 cm H2O PEEP in the high VT-ZEEP group. Preoperative and postoperative spirometric measurements were done and chest X-rays were evaluated using the radiological atelectasis score (RAS). p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The intraoperative and postoperative arterial partial pressure of oxygen and arterial oxygen saturation values were significantly higher in the low VT-PEEP group than in the high VT-ZEEP group. At all times, the arterial-to-alveolar oxygenation gradients were significantly lower in the low VT-PEEP group than in the high VT-ZEEP group. Preoperative RAS were similar in both groups, but the postoperative RAS was significantly lower in the low VT-PEEP group (p < 0.001). Forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 s, and peak expiratory flow rate recorded postoperatively were significantly lower in the high VT-ZEEP group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative pulmonary functions were less impaired in patients ventilated with a VT of 6 mL/kg and 8 cm H2O PEEP than in patients ventilated with a VT of 10 mL/kg and ZEEP.

摘要

目的

比较小潮气量(VT)和适度呼气末正压(PEEP)与大潮气量和零呼气末正压(ZEEP)对机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺根治术后患者肺功能和氧合的影响。

受试者和方法

44 名患者随机分为低 VT-PEEP 组和高 VT-ZEEP 组。低 VT-PEEP 组患者通气采用 6 mL/kg 潮气量和 8 cm H2O PEEP,高 VT-ZEEP 组患者通气采用 10 mL/kg 潮气量和 0 cm H2O PEEP。术前和术后进行肺功能测量,并使用放射学肺不张评分(RAS)评估胸部 X 线片。p<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

低 VT-PEEP 组术中及术后动脉血氧分压和动脉血氧饱和度值均明显高于高 VT-ZEEP 组。在所有时间点,低 VT-PEEP 组的动脉-肺泡氧分压差均明显低于高 VT-ZEEP 组。两组术前 RAS 相似,但低 VT-PEEP 组术后 RAS 明显较低(p<0.001)。术后,高 VT-ZEEP 组用力肺活量、1 秒用力呼气量和呼气峰流量均明显降低(p<0.001)。

结论

与大潮气量和 ZEEP 通气相比,6 mL/kg 潮气量和 8 cm H2O PEEP 通气可减少术后肺功能受损。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Mechanical ventilation strategies for the surgical patient.外科患者的机械通气策略。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2015 Aug;21(4):351-7. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000215.
8
Lung-protective ventilation in abdominal surgery.腹部手术中的肺保护性通气
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014 Aug;20(4):426-30. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000121.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验