• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人群的腹腔镜胆囊切除术

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the geriatric population.

作者信息

Behrman S W, Melvin W S, Babb M E, Johnson J, Ellison E C

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Grant Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 1996 May;62(5):386-90.

PMID:8615569
Abstract

Although the role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) as a safe and cost effective procedure has been ascertained, its role in the geriatric population, the majority of whom present with coexistent diseases, has yet to be defined. We retrospectively reviewed outcome parameters of 144 consecutive patients over age 65 undergoing LC, for both acute cholecystitis and symptomatic cholelithiasis. These results were compared with 72 patients having open cholecystectomy (OC) during the same time period and in the year preceding the introduction of LC. Groups were well matched with respect to age, age distribution indication for surgery, and underlying comorbid illnesses. Of those with symptomatic cholelithiasis, LC did not prolong operative time when compared with OC, but resulted in significantly earlier discharge (1.8 +/- 2.9 vs. 6.7 +/- 5.7 days (P < 0.0001)), with comparable hospital costs and with no increase in postoperative complications. With respect to acute cholecystitis, LC significantly prolonged operative time (105.8 +/- 40.8 vs. 78.1 +/- 28.5 minutes (P < 0.05)), but when successful, significantly reduced postoperative stay (4.2 +/- 3.8 vs. 7.5 +/- 2.3 days (P < 0.05)). There was no increase in postoperative complications in those having LC, and hospital costs were comparable with OC. Seven patients were converted from LC to OC; 4 of these (16%) were for acute cholecystitis versus a 2.5 per cent incidence of conversion for symptomatic cholelithiasis, and these resulted in prolonged hospital stays and costs. There was no incidence of hypotension/hypercarbia, despite a 64 per cent incidence of cardiopulmonary cardiopulmonary diseases in those having LC. There was a 14 per cent incidence of cardiopulmonary complications in those having LC in contrast to a 43 per cent incidence in OC. LC in the geriatric population is a safe procedure for symptomatic cholelithiasis. The procedure should be undertaken with caution in those with acute cholecystitis with a low threshold for either early conversion or primary OC. Finally, our results suggest that extensive hemodynamic monitoring is not indicated.

摘要

尽管腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)作为一种安全且具有成本效益的手术方式已得到确认,但其在老年人群中的作用尚未明确,而大多数老年患者都伴有多种并存疾病。我们回顾性分析了144例年龄在65岁以上因急性胆囊炎和有症状胆结石接受LC手术患者的预后参数。将这些结果与同期以及引入LC手术前一年进行开腹胆囊切除术(OC)的72例患者进行比较。两组患者在年龄、年龄分布、手术指征以及潜在合并疾病方面匹配良好。对于有症状胆结石患者,与OC相比,LC并未延长手术时间,但出院时间显著提前(1.8±2.9天对6.7±5.7天(P<0.0001)),住院费用相当,且术后并发症未增加。对于急性胆囊炎患者,LC显著延长了手术时间(105.8±40.8分钟对78.1±28.5分钟(P<0.05)),但手术成功后,术后住院时间显著缩短(4.2±3.8天对7.5±2.3天(P<0.05))。接受LC手术的患者术后并发症未增加,住院费用与OC相当。7例患者由LC转为OC;其中4例(16%)因急性胆囊炎转为OC,而有症状胆结石患者的中转率为2.5%,中转导致住院时间延长和费用增加。尽管接受LC手术的患者中心肺疾病发生率为64%,但未发生低血压/高碳酸血症。接受LC手术的患者中心肺并发症发生率为14%,而OC患者中这一发生率为43%。对于有症状胆结石的老年患者,LC是一种安全的手术方式。对于急性胆囊炎患者,应谨慎进行LC手术,早期中转或直接行OC的阈值应较低。最后,我们的结果表明无需进行广泛的血流动力学监测。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the geriatric population.老年人群的腹腔镜胆囊切除术
Am Surg. 1996 May;62(5):386-90.
2
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎的腹腔镜胆囊切除术
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1996 Feb;6(1):26-8.
3
Laparoscopic vs. open cholecystectomy in patients aged 65 and older.65岁及以上患者的腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术对比
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998 Jun;8(3):208-10.
4
Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: a matched study.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术:一项配对研究。
Can J Surg. 1993 Aug;36(4):330-6.
5
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for elderly patients: gold standard for golden years?老年患者的腹腔镜胆囊切除术:黄金岁月的金标准?
Arch Surg. 2003 May;138(5):531-5; discussion 535-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.138.5.531.
6
Evaluation of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis.早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的疗效评估。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2009 Jan-Feb;56(89):26-8.
7
Abdominal aortic aneurysmorrhaphy and cholelithiasis in the era of endovascular surgery.血管腔内手术时代的腹主动脉瘤修补术与胆结石
Am Surg. 2002 Oct;68(10):839-43; discussion 843-4.
8
Comparison of laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy at Prince Abdulrahman Al Sudairy Hospital, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯阿卜杜勒拉赫曼·苏戴里王子医院腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术的比较。
East Afr Med J. 1998 Sep;75(9):536-9.
9
Safety, efficacy, cost, and morbidity of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: a prospective analysis of 228 consecutive patients.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术的安全性、有效性、成本及发病率:对228例连续患者的前瞻性分析
Am Surg. 1993 Jan;59(1):23-7.
10
Risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 22,953 consecutive cases from the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery database.腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者围手术期并发症的危险因素:对瑞士腹腔镜与胸腔镜外科学会数据库中22953例连续病例的分析
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Nov;203(5):723-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.07.018. Epub 2006 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients aged 80 years and over.80岁及以上患者的腹腔镜胆囊切除术
World J Surg. 2006 Jul;30(7):1204-10. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0413-2.