Gomez J, Dally P
Br Med J. 1977 Jun 4;1(6074):1451-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6074.1451.
Ninety-six patients complaining of recurrent or persistent abdominal pain were referred consecutively to a surgical clinic and a medical clinic, respectively. They were examined psychiatrically after their initial physical investigation. The psychiatric examination included rating scales for depression and anxiety, a personality inventory, life-events schedule, scale of verbal expressivity, and family and personal patterns of pain and invalidism. Only 15 patients (15-6%) had organic disorders that could be responsible for their symptoms. In the remainder, psychiatric factors were considered primarily responsible for their abdominal pain: 31 were depressed; 21 had chronic tension; in 17 hysterical mechanisms were prominent; and 12 were found to be unrecognised alcoholics. Follow-up at three and six months and recognition by 80% of the psychogenic group that a psychological explanation was plausible, confirmed the diagnoses, and over half responded favourably to psychiatric management. Features distinguishing the organic and psychogenic groups were delineated. Psychiatric assessment has a place among the investigations of non-acute abdominal pain; certainly it should not be condisered simply as "a last resort."
96名主诉反复或持续腹痛的患者分别被连续转诊至一家外科诊所和一家内科诊所。在进行初步身体检查后,他们接受了精神科检查。精神科检查包括抑郁和焦虑评定量表、人格量表、生活事件量表、言语表达量表以及疼痛和病残的家庭及个人模式。只有15名患者(15.6%)有可解释其症状的器质性疾病。在其余患者中,精神因素被认为是其腹痛的主要原因:31名患者抑郁;21名有慢性紧张;17名患者癔症机制突出;12名被发现是未被识别的酗酒者。在三个月和六个月时进行随访,80%的心理因素组患者认可心理解释合理,这证实了诊断,并且超过一半的患者对精神科治疗反应良好。区分器质性和心理因素组的特征也已明确。精神科评估在非急性腹痛的检查中占有一席之地;当然,它不应仅仅被视为“最后的手段”。