• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超龄青少年药物使用增加。

Increased drug use among old-for-grade adolescents.

作者信息

Byrd R S, Weitzman M, Doniger A S

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, NY, USA.

出版信息

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996 May;150(5):470-6. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170300024006.

DOI:10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170300024006
PMID:8620227
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether students older than most other students at their grade level ("old for grade") are more likely to report engaging in alcohol, tobacco, and drug-related behaviors.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional analyses of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Youth Risk Behavior Survey.

SETTING

Monroe County, New York.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 1396 high school students from selected classrooms; 68 classrooms randomly selected within schools with the number of students per school proportionally selected from the 28 schools in the county.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Rates of drug-related behaviors by age-for-grade status.

RESULTS

Thirty-six percent of adolescents surveyed were old for grade. Adjusting for multiple potential confounders, old-for-grade high school students were more likely to report being regular smokers, chewing tobacco, drinking alcoholic beverages, driving in a car with someone who had been drinking, using alcohol or other drugs before last sexual intercourse, using cocaine in the past month, ever using crack, and using injected or other illicit drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Old-for-grade status is a potentially important marker for drug-related behaviors in adolescents. The antecedents of adolescent risk-taking behavior may begin before the teen years, and prevention of school failure or interventions targeted toward old-for-grade children could affect their propensity to experiment with or use drugs during adolescence.

摘要

目的

确定在同年级学生中年龄偏大(“相对年级年龄大”)的学生是否更有可能报告有饮酒、吸烟和与毒品相关的行为。

设计

对疾病控制与预防中心青少年风险行为调查进行横断面分析。

地点

纽约门罗县。

参与者

从选定教室中选取的1396名高中生;在各学校内随机选取68间教室,每个学校的学生数量按比例从该县28所学校中选取。

主要观察指标

按相对年级年龄状况划分的与毒品相关行为的发生率。

结果

接受调查的青少年中有36%相对年级年龄大。在对多个潜在混杂因素进行调整后,相对年级年龄大的高中生更有可能报告自己是经常吸烟者、咀嚼烟草者、饮酒者、乘坐过酒驾者驾驶的汽车、在最后一次性交前使用过酒精或其他毒品、在过去一个月内使用过可卡因、曾使用过快克,以及使用过注射或其他非法毒品。

结论

相对年级年龄大是青少年与毒品相关行为的一个潜在重要标志。青少年冒险行为的先兆可能在青少年时期之前就已出现,预防学业失败或针对相对年级年龄大的儿童进行干预可能会影响他们在青春期尝试或使用毒品的倾向。

相似文献

1
Increased drug use among old-for-grade adolescents.超龄青少年药物使用增加。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996 May;150(5):470-6. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170300024006.
2
The relationship between early age of onset of initial substance use and engaging in multiple health risk behaviors among young adolescents.青少年初次使用物质的早期发病年龄与从事多种健康风险行为之间的关系。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999 Mar;153(3):286-91. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.153.3.286.
3
Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance - United States, 2015.青少年风险行为监测 - 美国,2015 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2016 Jun 10;65(6):1-174. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6506a1.
4
Youth risk behavior surveillance. National Alternative High School Youth Risk Behavior Survey, United States, 1998.青少年风险行为监测。美国1998年全国替代性高中青少年风险行为调查。
J Sch Health. 2000 Jan;70(1):5-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2000.tb06439.x.
5
When and where do youths have sex? The potential role of adult supervision.青少年何时何地发生性行为?成人监管的潜在作用。
Pediatrics. 2002 Dec;110(6):e66. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.6.e66.
6
Gender differences in risk behaviors among adolescents who experience date fighting.经历约会暴力的青少年在风险行为上的性别差异。
Pediatrics. 1999 Dec;104(6):1286-92. doi: 10.1542/peds.104.6.1286.
7
Pregnancy and other risk behaviors among adolescent girls in Ohio.俄亥俄州少女的怀孕及其他风险行为。
J Adolesc Health. 1998 Jan;22(1):50-5. doi: 10.1016/S1054-139X(97)00160-2.
8
The association between health risk behaviors and sexual orientation among a school-based sample of adolescents.在校青少年样本中健康风险行为与性取向之间的关联。
Pediatrics. 1998 May;101(5):895-902. doi: 10.1542/peds.101.5.895.
9
Perceived ease of access to alcohol, tobacco and other substances in rural and urban US students.美国城乡学生对酒精、烟草及其他物质的易获取感知情况。
Rural Remote Health. 2015 Oct-Dec;15(4):3397. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
10
[Alcohol and other psychoactive substances addiction risk assessment among chosen high school students test group].[选定的高中生测试组中酒精及其他精神活性物质成瘾风险评估]
Przegl Lek. 2014;71(11):620-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Relative Age Effect on Problematic Alcohol Use in Adolescents.相对年龄效应对青少年问题性饮酒的影响。
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2021 Dec;31(10):692-696. doi: 10.1089/cap.2021.0033. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
2
Old-for-Grade Status and Suicide Risk in U.S. High School Students.年级偏高与美国高中生的自杀风险
Arch Suicide Res. 2020;24(sup2):S282-S292. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2019.1595797. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
3
Relationship of Age for Grade and Pubertal Stage to Early Initiation of Substance Use.年级、青春期阶段的年龄与物质使用早期开始之间的关系。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Nov 19;12:E203. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.150234.
4
Patterns in Office Referral Data by Grade, Race/Ethnicity and Gender.按年级、种族/族裔和性别划分的门诊转诊数据模式。
J Posit Behav Interv. 2010 Jan;12(1):44-54. doi: 10.1177/1098300708329710.
5
Academic performance, educational aspiration and birth outcomes among adolescent mothers: a national longitudinal study.青少年母亲的学业成绩、教育期望与出生结局:一项全国性纵向研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jan 15;14:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-3.
6
Factors contributing to school failure among school children in very fast developing Arabian Society.在快速发展的阿拉伯社会中,导致学童学业失败的因素。
Oman Med J. 2009 Jul;24(3):212-7. doi: 10.5001/omj.2009.42.
7
Socio-demographic Characteristics of Substance Abusers Admitted to a Private Specialist Clinic.入住私立专科诊所的药物滥用者的社会人口学特征。
Ghana Med J. 2005 Mar;39(1):2-7. doi: 10.4314/gmj.v39i1.35973.
8
Associations of family environment and individual factors with tobacco, alcohol, and illicit drug use in adolescents.家庭环境和个体因素与青少年烟草、酒精及非法药物使用之间的关联。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2000 Jan;16(1):33-42. doi: 10.1023/a:1007644331197.