• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Clinical and physiologic effects of biofeedback in outlet obstruction constipation.

作者信息

Ho Y H, Tan M, Goh H S

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 1996 May;39(5):520-4. doi: 10.1007/BF02058704.

DOI:10.1007/BF02058704
PMID:8620801
Abstract

PURPOSE

We report the results of biofeedback (BF) on patients with outlet obstruction defecation (OOC), including those with and without measurable paradoxical puborectalis contractions (PP). Clinical and anorectal physiologic parameters (ARP) were assessed one week before and after a standardized course of BF.

METHODS

Sixty-two consecutive patients (24 men, 38 women; mean age, 48 (standard error of the mean, 2.3) years) were recruited. All had persistent constipation despite six weeks of dietary fiber supplements. Colonic inertia was excluded by transit marker studies. Defecating proctography excluded anatomic abnormalities causing outlet obstruction. Patients underwent four outpatient sessions of biofeedback, each session lasting one hour.

RESULTS

After BF, 56 patients (90.3 percent) were subjectively improved. Frequency of spontaneous bowel movements were significantly increased (P = 0.003). Frequency of laxative-induced (P = 0.004) and enema-induced (P = 0.005) stools were reduced. Anal resting (P = 0.04) and squeeze (P = 0.002) pressures were increased. Number of patients with PP was reduced from 40 to 31 (P = 0.004). Presence of PP did not affect response to BF. There were no differences in ARP between the 56 patients who improved and the 6 who did not. There were no side effects or clinical regressions after a mean follow-up of 14.9 (standard error of the means, 0.9) months.

CONCLUSIONS

BF effectively treated OOC in 90.3 percent, regardless of PP. Anal pressures were increased, and PP was decreased.

摘要

相似文献

1
Clinical and physiologic effects of biofeedback in outlet obstruction constipation.
Dis Colon Rectum. 1996 May;39(5):520-4. doi: 10.1007/BF02058704.
2
Use of Biofeedback Combined With Diet for Treatment of Obstructed Defecation Associated With Paradoxical Puborectalis Contraction (Anismus): Predictive Factors and Short-term Outcome.生物反馈联合饮食治疗与耻骨直肠肌反常收缩相关的排便障碍(盆底失弛缓综合征):预测因素和短期结果
Dis Colon Rectum. 2016 Feb;59(2):115-21. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000519.
3
Identification of patients likely to benefit from biofeedback for outlet obstruction constipation.识别可能从生物反馈治疗中受益的出口梗阻型便秘患者。
Br J Surg. 1999 Mar;86(3):355-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01047.x.
4
Biofeedback therapy for bowel dysfunction following low anterior resection.低位前切除术后肠道功能障碍的生物反馈疗法
Ann Acad Med Singap. 1997 May;26(3):299-302.
5
Prospective assessment of biofeedback for the treatment of paradoxical puborectalis contraction.生物反馈治疗矛盾性耻骨直肠肌收缩的前瞻性评估
Dis Colon Rectum. 1992 Feb;35(2):145-50. doi: 10.1007/BF02050669.
6
Patterns of anismus and the relation to biofeedback therapy.盆底失弛缓综合征模式及其与生物反馈治疗的关系。
Dis Colon Rectum. 1996 Jul;39(7):768-73. doi: 10.1007/BF02054442.
7
Biofeedback benefits only patients with outlet dysfunction, not patients with isolated slow transit constipation.生物反馈仅对出口梗阻型患者有益,对单纯慢传输型便秘患者无效。
Gastroenterology. 2005 Jul;129(1):86-97. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.05.015.
8
Biofeedback therapy for defecatory dysfunction: "real life" experience.生物反馈疗法治疗排便功能障碍:“真实生活”中的经验。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013 Mar;47(3):252-5. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e318266f43a.
9
Randomized controlled trial of biofeedback, sham feedback, and standard therapy for dyssynergic defecation.生物反馈、假反馈和标准疗法治疗排便协同失调的随机对照试验。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Mar;5(3):331-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.12.023.
10
Anorectal function and the effect of biofeedback therapy in ambulatory spinal cord disease patients having constipation.门诊脊髓疾病便秘患者的肛门直肠功能及生物反馈治疗的效果
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2010 Nov;45(11):1281-8. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2010.483741. Epub 2010 Jul 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of biofeedback therapy on anorectal physiological parameters among patients with fecal evacuation disorder.生物反馈疗法对排便障碍患者肛门直肠生理参数的影响。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2017 Mar;36(2):99-104. doi: 10.1007/s12664-017-0731-y. Epub 2017 Feb 18.
2
Short-term outcomes after rehabilitation treatment in patients selected by a novel rehabilitation score system (Brusciano score) with or without previous stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for rectal outlet obstruction.新型康复评分系统(布鲁西亚诺评分)选择的患者在接受康复治疗后的短期结果,无论是否进行过先前的经肛吻合直肠切除术(STARR)治疗直肠出口梗阻。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013 Jun;28(6):783-93. doi: 10.1007/s00384-012-1565-9. Epub 2012 Sep 15.
3
Results in the long-term course after stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR).
吻合器经肛直肠切除术(STARR)后的长期结果。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012 Jun;397(5):771-8. doi: 10.1007/s00423-012-0920-1. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
4
Obstructed defecation: the role of anorectal manometry.排便障碍:肛肠测压的作用。
Tech Coloproctol. 2012 Feb;16(1):67-72. doi: 10.1007/s10151-011-0800-7. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
5
Constipation in adults.成人便秘
BMJ Clin Evid. 2010 Jul 5;2010:0413.
6
Long-term results of stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for obstructive defecation syndrome.经肛吻合器直肠切除术(STARR)治疗梗阻性排便障碍综合征的长期疗效。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010 Nov;25(11):1287-92. doi: 10.1007/s00384-010-1042-2. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
7
Treatment of obstructed defecation.排便梗阻的治疗。
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2005 May;18(2):85-95. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-870889.
8
Constipation in adults.成人便秘
BMJ Clin Evid. 2007 Aug 1;2007:0413.
9
Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR): a new option in the treatment of obstructive defecation syndrome.吻合器经肛门直肠切除术(STARR):治疗出口梗阻型便秘的新选择。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2006 Feb;391(1):32-7. doi: 10.1007/s00423-005-0004-6. Epub 2006 Jan 10.
10
Outlet Dysfunction Constipation.出口梗阻型便秘
Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2001 Aug;4(4):293-297. doi: 10.1007/s11938-001-0054-y.