Suppr超能文献

异帕米星与头孢他啶联用对比阿米卡星与头孢他啶联用在急性下呼吸道感染中的疗效及安全性

The efficacy and safety of isepamicin and ceftazidime compared with amikacin and ceftazidime in acute lower respiratory tract infection.

作者信息

Colardyn F

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care, University Hospital of Gent, Belgium.

出版信息

J Chemother. 1995 Jun;7 Suppl 2:129-35.

PMID:8622101
Abstract

Isepamicin is a new aminoglycoside antibiotic which has a superior stability to aminoglycoside-inactivating enzymes compared with other available aminoglycosides. In this multicentre, randomised, open study, the safety and efficacy of isepamicin plus ceftazidime was compared with that of amikacin plus ceftazidime in adults with acute lower respiratory tract infection. Patients with severe infections received intravenous administration of isepamicin 15 mg/kg once daily + ceftazidime 2g twice daily (n = 121) or amikacin 7.5 mg/kg twice daily + ceftazidime 2g twice daily (n = 61). Those with less severe infection received intramuscular or intravenous administration of isepamicin 8 mg/kg once daily + ceftazidime 1g twice daily (n = 56) or amikacin 7.5 mg/kg twice daily + ceftazidime 1g twice daily (n = 28). In the efficacy populations, the proportion of patients clinically cured in the isepamicin group (87/100; 87%) was similar to that in the amikacin group (36/47; 77%). Significantly more patients in the isepamicin group were cured or improved compared with the amikacin group (97% vs 89%; p = 0.042). The difference between treatment groups was also significant in patients with pneumonia (p = 0.05). The most commonly isolated target organisms were Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae. The proportion of patients in the efficacy population whose pretreatment valid target organisms were eliminated was similar in each treatment group (90% isepamicin vs 89% amikacin). A retrospective analysis showed there were slightly fewer clinical successes and a higher death rate in patients with nosocomial rather than community acquired pneumonia. Both treatments were well tolerated . Fourteen per cent of isepamicin and 11% of amikacin patients experienced adverse events. The incidence of ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity was low.

摘要

异帕米星是一种新型氨基糖苷类抗生素,与其他现有的氨基糖苷类抗生素相比,它对氨基糖苷类失活酶具有更高的稳定性。在这项多中心、随机、开放研究中,将异帕米星加头孢他啶与阿米卡星加头孢他啶在成人急性下呼吸道感染患者中的安全性和有效性进行了比较。重症感染患者接受静脉注射异帕米星15mg/kg每日一次+头孢他啶2g每日两次(n = 121)或阿米卡星7.5mg/kg每日两次+头孢他啶2g每日两次(n = 61)。病情较轻的感染患者接受肌肉注射或静脉注射异帕米星8mg/kg每日一次+头孢他啶1g每日两次(n = 56)或阿米卡星7.5mg/kg每日两次+头孢他啶1g每日两次(n = 28)。在疗效人群中,异帕米星组临床治愈患者的比例(87/100;87%)与阿米卡星组(36/47;77%)相似。与阿米卡星组相比,异帕米星组治愈或改善的患者明显更多(97%对89%;p = 0.042)。治疗组之间的差异在肺炎患者中也很显著(p = 0.05)。最常见的分离目标病原体是铜绿假单胞菌、大肠埃希菌、金黄色葡萄球菌和肺炎克雷伯菌。每个治疗组中疗效人群中治疗前有效的目标病原体被清除的患者比例相似(异帕米星组为90%,阿米卡星组为89%)。一项回顾性分析显示,医院获得性肺炎患者的临床成功率略低,死亡率较高,而非社区获得性肺炎患者。两种治疗的耐受性都很好。14%的异帕米星患者和11%的阿米卡星患者发生了不良事件。耳毒性和肾毒性的发生率较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验