Comparison of the efficacy and safety of isepamicin and amikacin in the treatment of acute lower respiratory tract infections caused by gram-negative organisms.

In a prospective multicentre open trial, hospitalised adult patients with acute lower respiratory tract infections, mainly pneumonia or bronchitis, were randomised to receive either isepamicin 8 or 15 mg/kg once daily depending on the severity of the infection or amikacin 7.5 mg/kg twice daily. Patients with infections known to be caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa were to be given concomitant treatment with ceftazidime. In the intent-to-treat population, i.e. patients who received at least one dose randomised treatment, a clinical cure or improvement at the end of treatment was seen in 112/125 (90%) isepamicin patients and 55/60 (92%) amikacin patients. The corresponding rates for patients with a primary diagnosis of pneumonia were 45/52 (87%) and 25/28 (89%). Cure/improvement rates for patients with P. aeruginosa as the causative pathogen (34 of whom also received ceftazidime) were 28/30 (93%) and 16/18 (89%), respectively. In the efficacy population (patients who had a valid pretreatment culture and who met other evaluability criteria), total elimination (documented or presumed if infection had resolved) of target pathogens occurred in 54/63 (86%) of isepamicin patients and 25/30 (83%) of amikacin patients. P. aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus were commonly isolated pathogens. Treatment-related adverse were mainly mild or moderate in severity and occurred in 10% of isepamicin patients and 13% of amikacin patients. Four patients (3 isepamicin and 1 amikacin) discontinued treatment because of severe adverse events and a further isepamicin patient withdrew because of a mild adverse event. Nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity occurred infrequently.