• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

输卵管绝育术后的妊娠风险:美国绝育协作审查的结果

The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: findings from the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization.

作者信息

Peterson H B, Xia Z, Hughes J M, Wilcox L S, Tylor L R, Trussell J

机构信息

Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341-3724, USA.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Apr;174(4):1161-8; discussion 1168-70. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70658-0.

DOI:10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70658-0
PMID:8623843
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to determine the risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization for common methods of tubal occlusion.

STUDY DESIGN

A multicenter, prospective cohort study was conducted in U.S. medical centers. A total of 10,685 women who underwent tubal sterilization was followed up for 8 to 14 years. The risk of pregnancy was assessed by cumulative life-table probabilities and proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

A total of 143 sterilization failures was identified. Cumulative 10-year probabilities of pregnancy were highest after clip sterilization (36.5/1000 procedures) and lowest after unipolar coagulation (7.5/1000) and postpartum partial salpingectomy (7.5/1000). The cumulative risk of pregnancy was highest among women sterilized at a young age with bipolar coagulation (54.3/1000) and clip application (52.1/1000).

CONCLUSIONS

Although tubal sterilization is highly effective, the risk of sterilization failure is higher than generally reported. The risk persists for years after the procedure and varies by method of tubal occlusion and age.

摘要

目的

我们的目的是确定常见输卵管闭塞方法进行输卵管绝育术后的妊娠风险。

研究设计

在美国医疗中心进行了一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。对总共10685例行输卵管绝育术的女性进行了8至14年的随访。通过累积生命表概率和比例风险模型评估妊娠风险。

结果

共识别出143例绝育失败。夹子绝育术后10年累积妊娠概率最高(每1000例手术中有36.5例),单极电凝术(每1000例中有7.5例)和产后部分输卵管切除术(每1000例中有7.5例)后最低。在年轻时接受双极电凝术(每1000例中有54.3例)和夹子绝育术(每1000例中有52.1例)的女性中,累积妊娠风险最高。

结论

尽管输卵管绝育术非常有效,但绝育失败的风险高于一般报道。该风险在手术后持续数年,并因输卵管闭塞方法和年龄而异。

相似文献

1
The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: findings from the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization.输卵管绝育术后的妊娠风险:美国绝育协作审查的结果
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Apr;174(4):1161-8; discussion 1168-70. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70658-0.
2
The risk of ectopic pregnancy after tubal sterilization. U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization Working Group.输卵管绝育术后异位妊娠的风险。美国绝育协作审查工作组。
N Engl J Med. 1997 Mar 13;336(11):762-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199703133361104.
3
Pregnancy after tubal sterilization with bipolar electrocoagulation. U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization Working Group.双侧输卵管电凝绝育术后妊娠。美国绝育协作审查工作组。
Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Aug;94(2):163-7. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00316-6.
4
Tubal sterilization.输卵管绝育术
N Engl J Med. 1997 Mar 13;336(11):796-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199703133361110.
5
Higher hysterectomy risk for sterilized than nonsterilized women: findings from the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization. The U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization Working Group.
Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Feb;91(2):241-6. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00648-0.
6
Tubal sterilization: focus on the U.S. experience.输卵管绝育术:聚焦美国经验。
Fertil Steril. 2000 May;73(5):913-22. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00481-7.
7
Pregnancy after tubal sterilization with silicone rubber band and spring clip application.采用硅胶带和弹簧夹进行输卵管绝育术后的妊娠情况。
Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Feb;97(2):205-10. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01114-5.
8
Menstrual function after tubal sterilization.输卵管绝育术后的月经功能。
Am J Epidemiol. 1992 Jun 15;135(12):1368-81. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116248.
9
Late sequelae following laparoscopic sterilization employing electrocoagulation and tubal ring techniques: a comparative study.采用电凝和输卵管环技术的腹腔镜绝育术后远期后遗症:一项对比研究。
Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1986;75(5):285-9.
10
A comparative clinical trial of the tubal ring versus the Rocket clip for female sterilization.输卵管环与火箭夹用于女性绝育的比较临床试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Dec 1;153(7):755-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(85)90340-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Chronic lower abdominal pain in an elderly female patient: a case report about sigmoid colon fistula and pelvic abdominal infection.老年女性慢性下腹痛 1 例:乙状结肠瘘并盆腔腹腔感染
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):535. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03375-7.
2
U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2024.美国 2024 年避孕方法选择实践推荐
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2024 Aug 8;73(3):1-77. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7303a1.
3
Two Consecutive Ruptured Tubal Ectopic Pregnancies after Interval Bilateral Tubal Ligation.
双侧输卵管结扎术后间隔期连续发生两次输卵管妊娠破裂
Int Med Case Rep J. 2024 May 8;17:417-421. doi: 10.2147/IMCRJ.S463007. eCollection 2024.
4
Spontaneous intrauterine pregnancy after tubal sterilization: A case report.输卵管绝育术后自然宫内妊娠:一例报告
SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2024 Apr 27;12:2050313X241251732. doi: 10.1177/2050313X241251732. eCollection 2024.
5
Legal medicine aspects of female sterilization: our experience.女性绝育的法医学问题:我们的经验
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jul 11;10:1198668. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1198668. eCollection 2023.
6
Efficacy of Tubal Surgery for Permanent Contraception: Considerations for the Clinician.输卵管绝育手术的有效性:临床医生应考虑的因素
Open Access J Contracept. 2023 Mar 17;14:53-59. doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S385255. eCollection 2023.
7
Does socioeconomic factors and healthcare coverage affect postpartum sterilization uptake in an urban, tertiary hospital?社会经济因素和医疗保健覆盖情况是否会影响城市三级医院的产后绝育率?
Reprod Health. 2023 Jan 27;20(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01572-5.
8
The efficacy of postpartum tubal sterilization training program with minilaparotomy approach in Ob/Gyn residents.妇产科住院医师采用小切口剖腹术进行产后输卵管绝育培训项目的效果
Heliyon. 2022 Dec 28;9(1):e12722. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12722. eCollection 2023 Jan.
9
Applicability, Safety, and Efficiency of Salpingectomy versus Electrocoagulation and Laparoscopic Tubal Section in Ambulatory.门诊中输卵管切除术与电凝术和腹腔镜输卵管结扎术的适用性、安全性和效率
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2022 Sep;44(9):866-870. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1755243. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
10
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Intrauterine Contraception and Tubal Ligation.宫内节育器与输卵管结扎术的比较有效性和安全性。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Dec;37(16):4168-4175. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07433-4. Epub 2022 Feb 23.