• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Applicability, Safety, and Efficiency of Salpingectomy versus Electrocoagulation and Laparoscopic Tubal Section in Ambulatory.门诊中输卵管切除术与电凝术和腹腔镜输卵管结扎术的适用性、安全性和效率
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2022 Sep;44(9):866-870. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1755243. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
2
Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation.女性绝育术中输卵管通畅性阻断技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 7(9):CD003034. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003034.pub3.
3
Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation.女性绝育术中输卵管通畅性阻断技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 5;2016(8):CD003034. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003034.pub4.
4
Safety outcomes of female sterilization by salpingectomy and tubal occlusion.输卵管切除术和输卵管阻塞绝育术的安全性结果。
Contraception. 2017 May;95(5):505-508. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.02.017. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
5
Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy vs tubal ligation at the time of cesarean delivery.剖宫产时行随机输卵管切除术与输卵管结扎术的成本效益比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;220(1):106.e1-106.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.08.032. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
6
Salpingectomy for Sterilization: Change in Practice in a Large Integrated Health Care System, 2011-2016.绝育输卵管切除术:2011 - 2016年大型综合医疗保健系统中的实践变化
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;130(5):961-967. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002312.
7
Surgical treatment for tubal disease in women due to undergo in vitro fertilisation.因准备接受体外受精而患有输卵管疾病的女性的手术治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 22;10(10):CD002125. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002125.pub4.
8
Long-term follow-up of laparoscopic sterilizations by electrocoagulation, the Hulka clip and the tubal ring.腹腔镜下电凝绝育术、Hulka夹绝育术及输卵管环绝育术的长期随访
Contraception. 1990 Jan;41(1):9-18. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(90)90122-c.
9
A comparison of different laparoscopic sterilization occlusion techniques in 24,439 procedures.24439例手术中不同腹腔镜绝育闭塞技术的比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Oct 1;144(3):319-31. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(82)90585-3.
10
Salpingectomy versus Tubal Occlusion for Permanent Contraception during Cesarean Delivery: Outcomes and Physician Attitudes.剖宫产术中行输卵管切除术与输卵管结扎术用于永久性避孕:结局和医生态度。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Apr;28(4):860-864. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.07.025. Epub 2020 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Salpingectomy versus tubal occlusion in laparoscopic sterilisation (SALSTER): a national register-based randomised non-inferiority trial.腹腔镜绝育术中输卵管切除术与输卵管阻塞术的比较(SALSTER):一项基于国家登记处的随机非劣效性试验。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 Aug 11;45:101026. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101026. eCollection 2024 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Completeness of salpingectomy intended for ovarian cancer risk reduction.输卵管切除术预防卵巢癌风险的完整性。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Nov;155(2):280-282. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.09.005. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
2
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 774: Opportunistic Salpingectomy as a Strategy for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Prevention.美国妇产科医师学会委员会意见 No.774:机会性输卵管切除术作为上皮性卵巢癌预防策略。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;133(4):e279-e284. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003164.
3
Ovarian reserve after salpingectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.输卵管切除术后的卵巢储备:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 Jul;96(7):795-803. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13133. Epub 2017 May 4.
4
Safety outcomes of female sterilization by salpingectomy and tubal occlusion.输卵管切除术和输卵管阻塞绝育术的安全性结果。
Contraception. 2017 May;95(5):505-508. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.02.017. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
5
The performance and safety of bilateral salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention in the United States.美国预防性双侧输卵管切除术治疗卵巢癌的效果和安全性。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;216(3):270.e1-270.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.10.035. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
6
The Fallopian Tube in the 21st Century: When, Why, and How to Consider Removal.21世纪的输卵管:何时、为何以及如何考虑切除
Oncologist. 2015 Nov;20(11):1227-9. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0172. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
7
Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation.女性绝育术中输卵管通畅性阻断技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 7(9):CD003034. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003034.pub3.
8
Costs and benefits of opportunistic salpingectomy as an ovarian cancer prevention strategy.作为卵巢癌预防策略的机会性输卵管切除术的成本与效益
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;125(2):338-345. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000630.
9
Sterilization in the United States.美国的绝育情况。
Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Winter;1(1):23-32.
10
The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: findings from the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization.输卵管绝育术后的妊娠风险:美国绝育协作审查的结果
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Apr;174(4):1161-8; discussion 1168-70. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70658-0.

门诊中输卵管切除术与电凝术和腹腔镜输卵管结扎术的适用性、安全性和效率

Applicability, Safety, and Efficiency of Salpingectomy versus Electrocoagulation and Laparoscopic Tubal Section in Ambulatory.

机构信息

Serviço de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, Unidade Local de Saúde do Alto Minho, Viana do Castelo, Portugal.

Instituto de Investigação em Ciências a Vida e Saúde, Escola de Medicina, Universidade do Minho, Portugal.

出版信息

Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2022 Sep;44(9):866-870. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1755243. Epub 2022 Aug 29.

DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1755243
PMID:36037814
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9948043/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Female sterilization is a surgical procedure that aims women to permanently stop the use of conception. The benefits, risks and cost-effectiveness are important issues. The purpose of this study was comparing the applicability, complications and efficacy of salpingectomy versus electrocoagulation and tubal occlusion by laparoscopy in the Ambulatory Surgery Unit.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective and observational study that included women undergoing laparoscopic sterilization procedures at our Ambulatory Surgery Unit, during three years. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, applying the Fisher exact test, the Mann-Whitney test, and Linear Regression.

RESULTS

Two hundred and twenty-one laparoscopic surgical procedures were performed, including 79 (35.7%) bilateral total salpingectomies and 142 (64.3%) electrocoagulation and bilateral tubal occlusion procedures. The majority of the procedures were performed by a resident ( = 162; 73.3%), with 40% ( = 33) of salpingectomies. The surgical time, independently the type of surgeon, was significantly shorter in the tubal occlusion (42.2 vs. 52.7 min,  < 0.001). Safety and efficacy endpoints were not significantly different between the two groups, with a case of pregnancy in tubal occlusion group.

CONCLUSION

Salpingectomy is a safe and effective alternative comparing with electrocoagulation and tubal occlusion.

摘要

目的

女性绝育是一种旨在使女性永久停止怀孕的手术。其益处、风险和成本效益是重要的问题。本研究的目的是比较输卵管切除术与腹腔镜下电凝和输卵管闭塞术在日间手术中的适用性、并发症和疗效。

方法

我们进行了一项回顾性观察研究,纳入了在我们日间手术部接受腹腔镜绝育手术的女性,时间为三年。统计分析采用 SPSS,应用 Fisher 确切检验、Mann-Whitney 检验和线性回归。

结果

共进行了 221 例腹腔镜手术,包括 79 例(35.7%)双侧输卵管全切除术和 142 例(64.3%)电凝和双侧输卵管闭塞术。大多数手术由住院医师( = 162;73.3%)完成,其中 40%( = 33)为输卵管切除术。手术时间,独立于手术医生的类型,在输卵管闭塞组明显更短(42.2 分钟对 52.7 分钟, < 0.001)。两组之间的安全性和疗效终点无显著差异,输卵管闭塞组有 1 例妊娠。

结论

输卵管切除术与电凝和输卵管闭塞术相比是一种安全有效的替代方法。