• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Higher hysterectomy risk for sterilized than nonsterilized women: findings from the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization. The U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization Working Group.

作者信息

Hillis S D, Marchbanks P A, Tylor L R, Peterson H B

机构信息

Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Feb;91(2):241-6. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00648-0.

DOI:10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00648-0
PMID:9469283
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the risk of hysterectomy among previously sterilized women and women whose husbands had undergone vasectomy, and to evaluate whether this risk differed by age at surgical procedure or by method of tubal occlusion.

METHODS

Our study population comprised 7718 women enrolled in a prospective, multicenter cohort study between 1978 and 1986. After stratifying by the woman's age at surgical procedure, we used the life-table approach and adjusted hazards ratios to examine whether the relative risk of hysterectomy during the 5 years after enrollment differed between the 7174 women who had been sterilized and the 544 women whose husbands had undergone vasectomy.

RESULTS

The 5-year cumulative probability of hysterectomy was 8% among the previously sterilized women and 2% among the women whose husbands had undergone vasectomy. Among women 34 years of age and younger at enrollment, sterilized women were 4.4 times as likely to have a hysterectomy as women whose husbands had undergone vasectomy (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9, 10.0). Findings were similar for women 35 years of age and older (rate ratio = 4.6; 95% CI 1.4, 14.5). Each of the six most commonly used methods of tubal occlusion was associated with an increased risk of hysterectomy.

CONCLUSION

Women undergoing tubal sterilization were more likely than women whose husbands underwent vasectomy to undergo hysterectomy within 5 years after sterilization, regardless of age at sterilization. An increased risk of hysterectomy was observed for each method of tubal occlusion.

摘要

相似文献

1
Higher hysterectomy risk for sterilized than nonsterilized women: findings from the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization. The U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization Working Group.
Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Feb;91(2):241-6. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00648-0.
2
Tubal sterilization and risk of subsequent hospital admission for menstrual disorders.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Jun;166(6 Pt 1):1698-705; discussion 1705-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91559-s.
3
Tubal sterilization and long-term risk of hysterectomy: findings from the United States collaborative review of sterilization. The U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization Working Group.
Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Apr;89(4):609-14. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00053-7.
4
The risk of ectopic pregnancy after tubal sterilization. U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization Working Group.输卵管绝育术后异位妊娠的风险。美国绝育协作审查工作组。
N Engl J Med. 1997 Mar 13;336(11):762-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199703133361104.
5
A comparison of women's regret after vasectomy versus tubal sterilization.输精管结扎术与输卵管绝育术后女性遗憾情绪的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jun;99(6):1073-9. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)01981-6.
6
Tubal sterilization and the long-term risk of hysterectomy.
JAMA. 1990 Dec 12;264(22):2893-8.
7
Tubal sterilization: findings in a large prospective study.输卵管绝育术:一项大型前瞻性研究的结果
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1983 Mar;90(3):203-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1983.tb08609.x.
8
Long-term risk of hysterectomy among 80,007 sterilized and comparison women at Kaiser Permanente, 1971-1987.1971年至1987年期间,凯撒医疗机构80,007名绝育女性及对照女性子宫切除的长期风险。
Am J Epidemiol. 1993 Oct 1;138(7):508-21. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116885.
9
The pre- and poststerilization predictors of poststerilization regret in husbands and wives.夫妻绝育后后悔的绝育前后预测因素。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1991 Oct;179(10):602-8. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199110000-00003.
10
The risk of menstrual abnormalities after tubal sterilization. U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization Working Group.输卵管绝育术后月经异常的风险。美国绝育协作审查工作组。
N Engl J Med. 2000 Dec 7;343(23):1681-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200012073432303.

引用本文的文献

1
Hysterectomy Rate Following Endometrial Ablation in Ontario: A Cohort Analysis of 76,446 Patients.安大略省子宫内膜切除术后的子宫切除率:对76446例患者的队列分析。
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2024 Sep;16(3):311-316. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.13.3.028.
2
Race, class, caste, disability, sterilisation and hysterectomy.种族、阶级、种姓、残疾、绝育和子宫切除术。
Med Humanit. 2023 Mar;49(1):27-37. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2022-012381. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
3
A systematic review and meta-analysis on tubal ligation and breast cancer risk.输卵管结扎与乳腺癌风险的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 19;11(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02000-8.
4
Tubal Ligation and Age at Natural Menopause.输卵管结扎术与自然绝经年龄。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jun;133(6):1247-1254. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003266.
5
Post-partum tubal ligation at time of cesarean delivery or via laparoscopy as an interval sterilization has similar effects on ovarian reserve.剖宫产时行产后输卵管结扎术或作为间隔绝育术通过腹腔镜进行输卵管结扎术,对卵巢储备功能的影响相似。
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2020 Mar 6;21(1):24-28. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2018.2018.0087. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
6
Predictors of hysterectomy among married women 15-49 years in India.印度 15-49 岁已婚女性行子宫切除术的预测因素。
Reprod Health. 2018 Jan 5;15(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0445-8.
7
Incidence and determinants of hysterectomy in a low-income setting in Gujarat, India.印度古吉拉特邦低收入地区子宫切除术的发病率及决定因素
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Feb;32(1):68-78. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czw099. Epub 2016 Aug 6.
8
Tubal ligation in relation to menopausal symptoms and breast cancer risk.输卵管结扎与绝经症状和乳腺癌风险的关系。
Br J Cancer. 2013 Sep 3;109(5):1291-5. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.433. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
9
Invited commentary: reproductive organ surgeries and breast cancer risk--apples, oranges, or fruit cocktail?特邀评论:生殖器官手术与乳腺癌风险——是苹果、橙子,还是什锦水果?
Am J Epidemiol. 2013 Mar 15;177(6):500-3. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws438. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
10
Evidence-based guidance on Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use: identification of research gaps.《避孕使用特定实践建议的循证指南:研究差距识别》
Contraception. 2013 May;87(5):517-23. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.08.003. Epub 2012 Oct 18.