Strain E C, Stitzer M L, Liebson I A, Bigelow G E
Department of Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Francis Scott Key Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland 21224.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1994 Dec;116(4):401-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02247469.
This study compared the efficacy of buprenorphine to methadone for decreasing cocaine use in patients with combined opioid and cocaine use. Participants (n = 51) were enrolled in a 26-week treatment program and randomly assigned to either buprenorphine or methadone. Dosing was double-blind and double-dummy. Patients were stabilized on either 8 mg sublingual buprenorphine or 50 mg oral methadone, with dose increases given in response to continued illicit cocaine use or opioid use through week 16 of treatment. Maximum doses possible were 16 mg buprenorphine and 90 mg methadone. Average doses achieved were 11.2 mg buprenorphine and 66.6 mg methadone; 49% of the patients received the maximum doses possible. Urine samples were collected three times per week, and there was no significant difference in the rate of cocaine positive urines for the intent-to-treat sample (69% for buprenorphine versus 63% for methadone). For patients who remained in treatment through the flexible dosing period (n = 28), there were significant decreases in cocaine positive urines over time (P < 0.01), but no significant differences between groups or group x time effects. Buprenorphine and methadone were equally effective on measures of treatment retention, urine results for opioids, and compliance with attendance and counseling. These results demonstrate no selective efficacy of either buprenorphine or methadone in attenuating cocaine use in this population, but do provide further support for the equivalent efficacy of buprenorphine and methadone in the treatment of opioid dependence.
本研究比较了丁丙诺啡与美沙酮在减少同时使用阿片类药物和可卡因的患者中可卡因使用量方面的疗效。参与者(n = 51)参加了一个为期26周的治疗项目,并被随机分配至丁丙诺啡组或美沙酮组。给药采用双盲双模拟法。患者分别以8毫克舌下含服丁丙诺啡或50毫克口服美沙酮进行稳定治疗,在治疗的第16周前,根据持续的非法可卡因使用或阿片类药物使用情况增加剂量。丁丙诺啡的最大剂量为16毫克,美沙酮的最大剂量为90毫克。实际达到的平均剂量分别为丁丙诺啡11.2毫克、美沙酮66.6毫克;49%的患者接受了最大可能剂量。每周收集三次尿液样本,意向性分析样本中可卡因阳性尿液率无显著差异(丁丙诺啡组为69%,美沙酮组为63%)。对于在灵活给药期持续接受治疗的患者(n = 28),随着时间推移,可卡因阳性尿液显著减少(P < 0.01),但组间或组×时间效应无显著差异。丁丙诺啡和美沙酮在治疗保留率、阿片类药物尿液检测结果以及出勤和咨询依从性方面效果相当。这些结果表明,在该人群中,丁丙诺啡或美沙酮在减轻可卡因使用方面均无选择性疗效,但确实进一步支持了丁丙诺啡和美沙酮在治疗阿片类药物依赖方面疗效相当。