Papo M C, Paczan P R, Fuhrman B P, Steinhorn D M, Hernan L J, Leach C L, Holm B A, Fisher J E, Kahn B A
Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Buffalo (SUNY), New York 14222, USA.
Crit Care Med. 1996 Mar;24(3):466-74. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199603000-00017.
To compare the effectiveness of perfluorocarbon-associated gas exchange to volume controlled positive pressure breathing in supporting gas exchange, lung mechanics, and survival in an acute lung injury model.
A prospective, randomized study.
A university medical school laboratory approved for animal research.
Neonatal piglets.
Eighteen piglets were randomized to receive perfluorcarbon-associated gas exchange with perflubron (n=10) or volume controlled continuous positive pressure breathing (n=8) after acute lung injury was induced by oleic acid infusion (0.15 mL/kg iv).
Arterial and venous blood gases, hemodynamics, and lung mechanics were measured every 15 mins during a 3-hr study period. All animals developed a metabolic and a respiratory acidosis during the infusion of oleic acid. Following randomization, the volume controlled positive pressure breathing group developed a profound acidosis (p<.05), while pH did not change in the perfluorocarbon-associated gas exchange group. Within 15 mins of initiating perfluorocarbon-associated gas exchange, oxygenation increased from a PaO2 of 52 +/- 12 torr (6.92 +/- 1.60 kPa) to 151 +/- 93 torr (20.0 +/- 12.4 kPa) and continued to improve throughout the study (p<.05). Animals that received volume controlled positive pressure breathing remained hypoxic with no appreciable change in PaO2. Although both groups developed hypercarbia during oleic acid infusion, PaCO2, steadily increased over time in the control group (p<.01). Static lung compliance significantly increased postrandomization (60 mins) in the animals supported by perflurocarbon-associated gas exchange (p<.05), whereas it remained unchanged over time in the volume controlled positive pressure breathing group. However, survival was significantly higher in the perfluorocarbon-associated gas exchange group with eight (80%) of ten animals surviving the entire study period. Only two (25%) of the eight animals in the volume controlled positive pressure breathing group were alive at the end of the study period (log-rank statistic, p=.013).
Perflurocarbon-associated gas exchange enhanced gas exchange, pulmonary mechanics, and survival in this model of acute lung injury.
在急性肺损伤模型中,比较全氟化碳相关气体交换与容量控制正压通气在支持气体交换、肺力学和生存率方面的有效性。
一项前瞻性随机研究。
一所获动物研究批准的大学医学院实验室。
新生仔猪。
18只仔猪在经油酸输注(0.15 mL/kg静脉注射)诱导急性肺损伤后,随机分为两组,分别接受全氟溴烷相关气体交换(n = 10)或容量控制持续正压通气(n = 8)。
在3小时的研究期间,每15分钟测量一次动脉和静脉血气、血流动力学和肺力学指标。在油酸输注期间,所有动物均出现代谢性和呼吸性酸中毒。随机分组后,容量控制正压通气组出现严重酸中毒(p <.05),而全氟化碳相关气体交换组的pH值未发生变化。在开始全氟化碳相关气体交换后的15分钟内,氧合从动脉血氧分压(PaO2)52±12托(6.92±1.60千帕)增加到151±93托(20.0±12.4千帕),并在整个研究过程中持续改善(p <.05)。接受容量控制正压通气的动物仍处于低氧状态,PaO2无明显变化。虽然两组在油酸输注期间均出现高碳酸血症,但对照组的PaCO2随时间稳步升高(p <.01)。在全氟化碳相关气体交换支持的动物中,随机分组后(60分钟)静态肺顺应性显著增加(p <.05),而容量控制正压通气组随时间保持不变。然而,全氟化碳相关气体交换组的生存率显著更高,10只动物中有8只(80%)存活至整个研究期结束。容量控制正压通气组的8只动物中,只有2只(25%)在研究期结束时存活(对数秩检验,p = 0.013)。
在该急性肺损伤模型中,全氟化碳相关气体交换增强了气体交换、肺力学和生存率。