• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新发结石形成:体外冲击波碎石术与经皮肾镜取石术的比较

New stone formation: a comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

作者信息

Carr L K, D'A Honey J, Jewett M A, Ibanez D, Ryan M, Bombardier C

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Urol. 1996 May;155(5):1565-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)66127-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0022-5347(01)66127-5
PMID:8627823
Abstract

PURPOSE

There is theoretical concern that stone recurrence rates may be higher following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) compared to other techniques because of residual stone debris.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We documented all new stone formations in 298 consecutive patients who initially achieved a stone-free status following ESWL for renal calculi less that 2 cm in largest dimension, and compared the findings to those of 62 patients treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy without ultrasonic fragmentation. Stone-free status was assessed by a centrally reviewed plain abdominal film and renal tomograms at 3 months. A plain abdominal film was repeated at 12 and 24 months to detect recurrence.

RESULTS

New stones formed in 22.2% of patients after ESWL and 4.2% after percutaneous nephrolithotomy at 1 year (p = 0.004), and in 34.8% versus 22.6%, respectively, at 2 years (p =0.190). Furthermore, more new stones recurred in the lower and mid calices compared to baseline location in the ESWL group (chi-square <0.0001), which was not observed in the percutaneous nephrolithotomy group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data support a trend toward higher stone recurrence rates in ESWL treated patients, which may be due to microscopic sand particles migrating to dependent calices and acting as a nidus for new stone formation.

摘要

目的

理论上担心,与其他技术相比,体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)后结石复发率可能更高,因为存在残留结石碎片。

材料与方法

我们记录了298例连续患者中所有新形成的结石,这些患者最初在接受ESWL治疗最大直径小于2 cm的肾结石后达到无结石状态,并将结果与62例未进行超声碎石的经皮肾镜取石术患者的结果进行比较。在3个月时通过中央审查的腹部平片和肾脏断层扫描评估无结石状态。在12个月和24个月时重复进行腹部平片以检测复发情况。

结果

ESWL治疗后1年,22.2%的患者形成新结石,经皮肾镜取石术后为4.2%(p = 0.004);2年时分别为34.8%和22.6%(p = 0.190)。此外,与ESWL组的基线位置相比,下盏和中盏出现更多新的复发结石(卡方检验<0.0001),而经皮肾镜取石术组未观察到这种情况。

结论

我们的数据支持ESWL治疗患者结石复发率较高的趋势,这可能是由于微小沙粒迁移至依赖的肾盏并成为新结石形成的病灶。

相似文献

1
New stone formation: a comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.新发结石形成:体外冲击波碎石术与经皮肾镜取石术的比较
J Urol. 1996 May;155(5):1565-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)66127-5.
2
Predictors for kidney stones recurrence following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) or percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)或经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)后肾结石复发的预测因素。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2012 Mar;95(3):342-8.
3
Treatment of renal stones in children: a comparison between percutaneous nephrolithotomy and shock wave lithotripsy.儿童肾结石的治疗:经皮肾镜取石术与冲击波碎石术的比较
J Urol. 2006 Aug;176(2):706-10. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.03.080.
4
Does previous extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy affect the performance and outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy?既往体外冲击波碎石术是否会影响经皮肾镜取石术的操作及结果?
J Urol. 2009 Feb;181(2):663-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.016. Epub 2008 Dec 16.
5
Renal calculi in lower pole calices: what is the best method of treatment?下极肾盏结石:最佳治疗方法是什么?
J Urol. 1991 Sep;146(3):721-3. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37905-3.
6
Comparative study of long-term stone recurrence after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and open stone surgery for kidney stones.体外冲击波碎石术与开放性肾结石手术治疗后结石长期复发的比较研究
Int J Urol. 1999 Mar;6(3):125-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-2042.1999.06311.x.
7
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for moderate sized kidney stones.经皮肾镜碎石术与体外冲击波碎石术治疗中等大小肾结石。
Urology. 2011 Oct;78(4):739-43. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.04.010. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
8
Staghorn calculi: analysis of treatment results between initial percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy with reference to surface area.鹿角形结石:参照表面积分析初始经皮肾镜取石术与体外冲击波碎石术单一疗法的治疗结果
J Urol. 1992 May;147(5):1219-25. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37522-5.
9
Meta-analysis of Optimal Management of Lower Pole Stone of 10 - 20 mm: Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) versus Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy (PCNL).10 - 20毫米下极结石最佳治疗方法的荟萃分析:可弯曲输尿管镜检查(FURS)与体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)对比经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)
Acta Med Indones. 2018 Jan;50(1):18-25.
10
Management of calyceal diverticular stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy: long-term outcome.体外冲击波碎石术和经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾盏憩室结石:长期疗效
BJU Int. 2007 Jul;100(1):151-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06911.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Follow-up of urolithiasis patients after treatment: an algorithm from the EAU Urolithiasis Panel.尿路结石患者治疗后的随访:欧洲泌尿外科学会尿路结石专家组的一项算法
World J Urol. 2024 Mar 28;42(1):202. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04872-y.
2
Resistant hypertension after shockwave lithotripsy: the rude awakening of an adrenal incidentaloma.冲击波碎石术后的难治性高血压:意外发现的肾上腺 INCIDENTALOMA 的粗鲁觉醒。
BMJ Case Rep. 2020 Aug 25;13(8):e235261. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-235261.
3
Does lithotripsy increase stone recurrence? A comparative study between extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and non-fragmenting percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
体外冲击波碎石术会增加结石复发率吗?体外冲击波碎石术与非粉碎性经皮肾镜取石术的对比研究。
Arab J Urol. 2016 Apr 3;14(2):108-14. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2016.02.004. eCollection 2016 Jun.
4
Role of flexible uretero-renoscopy in management of renal calculi in anomalous kidneys: single-center experience.软性输尿管肾镜在异位肾肾结石治疗中的作用:单中心经验
World J Urol. 2017 Feb;35(2):319-324. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1881-8. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
5
Is an overnight stay after percutaneous nephrolithotomy safe?经皮肾镜取石术后过夜留院是否安全?
Arab J Urol. 2012 Dec;10(4):367-71. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2012.07.006. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
6
Economics of stone disease/treatment.结石病/治疗的经济学
Arab J Urol. 2012 Sep;10(3):273-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2012.02.002. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
7
Diuresis and inversion therapy to improve clearance of lower caliceal stones after shock wave lithotripsy: A prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical study.利尿及体位倒置疗法改善冲击波碎石术后下盏结石清除率:一项前瞻性、随机、对照临床研究。
Indian J Urol. 2015 Apr-Jun;31(2):125-31. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.152813.
8
Residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.经皮肾镜取石术后残留结石碎片。
Balkan Med J. 2012 Sep;29(3):230-5. doi: 10.5152/balkanmedj.2012.082. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
9
Management of Clinically Insignificant Residual Fragments following Shock Wave Lithotripsy.冲击波碎石术后临床意义不显著的残留碎片的处理
Adv Urol. 2012;2012:320104. doi: 10.1155/2012/320104. Epub 2012 May 31.
10
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in renal transplants: a safe approach with a high stone-free rate.经皮肾镜取石术在移植肾中的应用:一种安全且结石清除率高的方法。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2011 Jun;43(2):329-35. doi: 10.1007/s11255-010-9837-1. Epub 2010 Sep 17.