• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外冲击波碎石术会增加结石复发率吗?体外冲击波碎石术与非粉碎性经皮肾镜取石术的对比研究。

Does lithotripsy increase stone recurrence? A comparative study between extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and non-fragmenting percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

作者信息

El-Assmy Ahmed, Harraz Ahmed M, Eldemerdash Yasser, Elkhamesy Mohammed, El-Nahas Ahmed R, Elshal Ahmed M, Sheir Khaled Z

机构信息

Department of Urology, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.

出版信息

Arab J Urol. 2016 Apr 3;14(2):108-14. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2016.02.004. eCollection 2016 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.aju.2016.02.004
PMID:27489737
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4963164/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effect of stone fragmentation on late stone recurrence by comparing the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) and non-fragmenting percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), and to investigate factors contributing to recurrent calculi.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We evaluated stone recurrence in 647 patients who initially achieved a stone-free status after ESWL and compared the outcomes to 137 stone-free patients treated with PCNL without stone fragmentation. Patients were evaluated every 3 months during the first year and every 6 months thereafter to censorship or time of first new stone formation. Stone recurrence rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The effects of demographics, stone characteristics, and intervention on the recurrence rate were studied using the log-rank test and the Cox-regression analysis.

RESULTS

For ESWL the recurrence rates were 0.8%, 35.8% and 60.1% after 1, 5 and 10 years, which were comparable to the 1.5%, 35.5% and 74.9%, respectively found in the PCNL group (P = 0.57). Stone burden (>8 mm) and a previous history of stone disease were significantly associated with higher recurrence rates regardless of the method of stone intervention (P = 0.02 and P = 0.01, respectively). In the ESWL group, a stone length of >8 mm showed a higher recurrence rate (P = 0.007). In both the ESWL and PCNL groups, there was a significant shift from baseline stone location, with an increased tendency for most new stones to recur in the calyces as opposed to the pelvis.

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison with PCNL, ESWL does not increase long-term stone recurrence in patients who become stone-free. The stone burden appears to be the primary factor in predicting stone recurrence after ESWL.

摘要

目的

通过比较体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)和非碎石性经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)的结果,研究结石碎裂对结石后期复发的影响,并探讨结石复发的相关因素。

患者与方法

我们评估了647例最初经ESWL治疗后达到无结石状态的患者的结石复发情况,并将结果与137例接受无结石碎裂的PCNL治疗的无结石患者进行比较。在第一年中,每3个月对患者进行一次评估,此后每6个月评估一次,直至审查或首次形成新结石的时间。使用Kaplan-Meier方法计算结石复发率。使用对数秩检验和Cox回归分析研究人口统计学、结石特征和干预措施对复发率的影响。

结果

ESWL术后1年、5年和10年的复发率分别为0.8%、35.8%和60.1%,与PCNL组分别为1.5%、35.5%和74.9%的复发率相当(P = 0.57)。无论结石干预方法如何,结石负荷(>8 mm)和既往结石病史均与较高的复发率显著相关(分别为P = 0.02和P = 0.01)。在ESWL组中,结石长度>8 mm显示出较高的复发率(P = 0.007)。在ESWL和PCNL组中,结石的基线位置均有显著变化,大多数新结石复发于肾盏的趋势增加,而非肾盂。

结论

与PCNL相比,ESWL不会增加达到无结石状态患者的长期结石复发率。结石负荷似乎是预测ESWL术后结石复发的主要因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42f1/4963164/bdc7492ac1c3/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42f1/4963164/c1ab0512299f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42f1/4963164/3b6327da32ec/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42f1/4963164/bdc7492ac1c3/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42f1/4963164/c1ab0512299f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42f1/4963164/3b6327da32ec/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42f1/4963164/bdc7492ac1c3/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Does lithotripsy increase stone recurrence? A comparative study between extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and non-fragmenting percutaneous nephrolithotomy.体外冲击波碎石术会增加结石复发率吗?体外冲击波碎石术与非粉碎性经皮肾镜取石术的对比研究。
Arab J Urol. 2016 Apr 3;14(2):108-14. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2016.02.004. eCollection 2016 Jun.
2
Predictors for kidney stones recurrence following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) or percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)或经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)后肾结石复发的预测因素。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2012 Mar;95(3):342-8.
3
Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a safe alternative to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for high-density, renal stones: a prospective, randomised trial.经皮肾镜碎石术是治疗高密度肾结石的一种安全替代体外冲击波碎石术的方法:一项前瞻性、随机试验。
BJU Int. 2021 Dec;128(6):744-751. doi: 10.1111/bju.15493. Epub 2021 Jun 13.
4
Management of calyceal diverticular stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy: long-term outcome.体外冲击波碎石术和经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾盏憩室结石:长期疗效
BJU Int. 2007 Jul;100(1):151-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06911.x.
5
Meta-analysis of Optimal Management of Lower Pole Stone of 10 - 20 mm: Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) versus Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy (PCNL).10 - 20毫米下极结石最佳治疗方法的荟萃分析:可弯曲输尿管镜检查(FURS)与体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)对比经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)
Acta Med Indones. 2018 Jan;50(1):18-25.
6
The clinical and cost effectiveness of surgical interventions for stones in the lower pole of the kidney: the percutaneous nephrolithotomy, flexible ureterorenoscopy and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower pole kidney stones randomised controlled trial (PUrE RCT) protocol.经皮肾镜碎石术、软性输尿管镜碎石术和体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾下极结石的临床和成本效益:肾下极结石随机对照试验(PUrE RCT)方案。
Trials. 2020 Jun 4;21(1):479. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04326-x.
7
Is mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy a safe alternative to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in pediatric age group in borderline stones? a randomized prospective study.微创经皮肾镜取石术是否可作为儿童边缘性结石患者的体外冲击波碎石术的安全替代疗法?一项随机前瞻性研究。
World J Urol. 2018 Jul;36(7):1139-1147. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2231-9. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
8
New stone formation: a comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.新发结石形成:体外冲击波碎石术与经皮肾镜取石术的比较
J Urol. 1996 May;155(5):1565-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)66127-5.
9
Comparative study of long-term stone recurrence after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and open stone surgery for kidney stones.体外冲击波碎石术与开放性肾结石手术治疗后结石长期复发的比较研究
Int J Urol. 1999 Mar;6(3):125-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-2042.1999.06311.x.
10
Effects of previous unsuccessful extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy treatment on the performance and outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.既往体外冲击波碎石治疗失败对经皮肾镜取石术操作及预后的影响。
Arab J Urol. 2017 Apr 7;15(2):94-99. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2017.01.009. eCollection 2017 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
AI-Driven Prediction of Renal Stone Recurrence Following ECIRS: A Machine Learning Approach to Postoperative Risk Stratification Incorporating 24-Hour Urine Data.ECIRS术后肾结石复发的人工智能驱动预测:一种结合24小时尿液数据的术后风险分层机器学习方法。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 7;14(12):4037. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124037.
2
Multi-site microbiota alteration is a hallmark of kidney stone formation.多部位微生物群落改变是肾结石形成的一个标志。
Microbiome. 2023 Nov 25;11(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s40168-023-01703-x.
3
A Comparative Study of Stone Re-Treatment after Lithotripsy.

本文引用的文献

1
The clinical efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in pediatric urolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.体外冲击波碎石术治疗小儿尿路结石的临床疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Urolithiasis. 2015 Jun;43(3):199-206. doi: 10.1007/s00240-015-0757-5. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
2
Kidney stones recurrence and regrowth after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.体外冲击波碎石术和经皮肾镜取石术后肾结石的复发与再生长。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2011 Sep;94(9):1077-83.
3
Long-term results of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of staghorn stones.
体外冲击波碎石术后结石再治疗的比较研究
Life (Basel). 2022 Dec 16;12(12):2130. doi: 10.3390/life12122130.
4
GeoBioMed perspectives on kidney stone recurrence from the reactive surface area of SWL-derived particles.从 SWL 衍生颗粒的反应表面积看 GeoBioMed 对肾结石复发的观点。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 1;12(1):18371. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23331-5.
5
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in new versus those patients with previous history of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy on ipsilateral side.新发患者与同侧有体外冲击波碎石术既往史患者的经皮肾镜取石术对比。
Pak J Med Sci. 2022 Mar-Apr;38(4Part-II):833-837. doi: 10.12669/pjms.38.4.5116.
6
Risk factors for kidney stone disease recurrence: a comprehensive meta-analysis.肾结石病复发的风险因素:一项综合荟萃分析。
BMC Urol. 2022 Apr 19;22(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01017-4.
经皮肾镜取石术治疗鹿角结石的长期疗效。
BJU Int. 2011 Sep;108(5):750-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09942.x. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
4
Complications and outcomes following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective study of 3,241 patients.体外冲击波碎石术后的并发症及结局:对3241例患者的前瞻性研究
Urol Res. 2010 Apr;38(2):135-42. doi: 10.1007/s00240-009-0247-8. Epub 2009 Dec 17.
5
Long-term outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy compared to shock wave lithotripsy and conservative management.经皮肾镜取石术与冲击波碎石术及保守治疗相比的长期疗效。
J Urol. 2008 Jun;179(6):2233-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.115. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
6
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy and its legacy.经皮肾镜取石术及其传承。
Eur Urol. 2005 Jan;47(1):22-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.08.009.
7
Comparative study of long-term stone recurrence after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and open stone surgery for kidney stones.体外冲击波碎石术与开放性肾结石手术治疗后结石长期复发的比较研究
Int J Urol. 1999 Mar;6(3):125-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-2042.1999.06311.x.
8
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for urinary calculi: comparison of immediate and long-term effects.体外冲击波碎石术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗尿路结石:近期及远期效果比较
J Stone Dis. 1993 Jan;5(1):8-18.
9
[Stone recurrence after stone free status with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy].[体外冲击波碎石术后结石清除状态下的结石复发]
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 1997 Mar;88(3):434-8. doi: 10.5980/jpnjurol1989.88.434.
10
[Recurrence of stones after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy].体外冲击波碎石术后结石复发
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1996 Oct;42(10):717-22.