• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

上消化道出血临床——确定最佳住院时长的指南

Upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage clinical--guideline determining the optimal hospital length of stay.

作者信息

Hay J A, Lyubashevsky E, Elashoff J, Maldonado L, Weingarten S R, Ellrodt A G

机构信息

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, The UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

Am J Med. 1996 Mar;100(3):313-22. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(97)89490-9.

DOI:10.1016/s0002-9343(97)89490-9
PMID:8629677
Abstract

PURPOSE

Physicians lack objective outcome data to define the medically appropriate length of stay (LOS) for patients hospitalized with acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (UGIH), resulting in wide variations in resource utilization and quality of care. A clinical practice guideline with the ability to assign relative risk for adverse events is proposed.

METHODS

A comprehensive scoring system was derived from the literature by using four variables; hemodynamics, time from bleeding, comorbidity, and esophagoduodenoscopy findings. The discriminatory ability, potential safety, and impact on resource utilization of the clinical practice guideline was measured in a retrospective, observational study.

RESULTS

Seventy percent of UGIH patients (349 of 500) achieved low-risk status according to the guideline, and, were therefore potentially suitable for early discharge from the hospital. If low-risk patients were discharged based upon the guideline, mean (+/- SD) hospital LOS would have been decreased from 4.8 +/- 2.4 days to 2.7 +/- 1.4 days; mean reduction was 2.1 bed-days per patient (95% CI 1.8 to 2.3, P <0.001). LOS would have increased in 4% of cases. Adopting the guideline's recommendation of early discharge would have resulted in a 0.6% (95% CI 0.07 to 2.1) complication rate, with no worsening of quality of care, as judged by implicit review.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed clinical practice guideline may safely reduce hospital LOS for selected low-risk patients with acute UGIH. Moreover, it also may reduce premature discharge of high-risk patients prone to life-threatening events.

摘要

目的

医生缺乏客观的预后数据来确定急性上消化道出血(UGIH)住院患者的合理住院时长(LOS),这导致资源利用和医疗质量存在很大差异。本文提出了一种能够对不良事件进行相对风险评估的临床实践指南。

方法

通过对血流动力学、出血时间、合并症和食管十二指肠镜检查结果这四个变量进行文献研究,得出了一个综合评分系统。在一项回顾性观察研究中,对该临床实践指南的鉴别能力、潜在安全性以及对资源利用的影响进行了评估。

结果

根据该指南,70%的UGIH患者(500例中的349例)达到低风险状态,因此有可能适合提前出院。如果依据该指南让低风险患者出院,平均(±标准差)住院时长将从4.8±2.4天降至2.7±1.4天;每位患者平均减少2.1个床日(95%置信区间为1.8至2.3,P<0.001)。4%的病例住院时长会增加。采用该指南关于提前出院的建议,并发症发生率将为0.6%(95%置信区间为0.07至2.1),通过隐性评估判断,医疗质量并未恶化。

结论

所提出的临床实践指南可能会安全地缩短部分低风险急性UGIH患者的住院时长。此外,它还可能减少易发生危及生命事件的高风险患者的过早出院情况。

相似文献

1
Upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage clinical--guideline determining the optimal hospital length of stay.上消化道出血临床——确定最佳住院时长的指南
Am J Med. 1996 Mar;100(3):313-22. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(97)89490-9.
2
Prospective evaluation of a clinical guideline recommending hospital length of stay in upper gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage.一项推荐上消化道出血患者住院时长的临床指南的前瞻性评估
JAMA. 1997;278(24):2151-6.
3
Outcome of accident and emergency room triaged patients with low risk non-variceal upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.急诊室分诊的低风险非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者的结局
Ir Med J. 2006 Apr;99(4):114-7.
4
Triage practice guideline for patients hospitalized with congestive heart failure: improving the effectiveness of the coronary care unit.充血性心力衰竭住院患者的分诊实践指南:提高冠心病监护病房的有效性
Am J Med. 1993 May;94(5):483-490. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(93)90082-Z.
5
Diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline.非静脉曲张性上消化道出血的诊断和治疗:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)指南。
Endoscopy. 2015 Oct;47(10):a1-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1393172. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
6
Upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage is associated with poor outcomes among patients with acute cholangitis: a nationwide analysis.急性胆管炎患者上消化道出血与不良预后相关:一项全国性分析
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 May;31(5):586-592. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001378.
7
Impact of day of admission on mortality and other outcomes in upper GI hemorrhage: a nationwide analysis.入院日对上消化道出血患者死亡率和其他结局的影响:一项全国性分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Aug;80(2):228-35. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.01.043. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
8
The in-hospital mortality rate for upper GI hemorrhage has decreased over 2 decades in the United States: a nationwide analysis.美国 20 余年来上消化道出血的院内病死率呈下降趋势:一项全国性分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Apr;81(4):882-8.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.09.027. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
9
Management of acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: comparison of an American and a Canadian medical centre.
Can J Gastroenterol. 2003 Aug;17(8):489-95. doi: 10.1155/2003/264595.
10
Can practice guidelines safely reduce hospital length of stay? Results from a multicenter interventional study.实践指南能否安全地缩短住院时间?一项多中心干预性研究的结果。
Am J Med. 1998 Jul;105(1):33-40. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(98)00129-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk stratification and scoring systems in upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding: review of performance and limitations in the emergency department.上消化道和下消化道出血的风险分层与评分系统:急诊科的性能与局限性综述
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 20;12:1564015. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1564015. eCollection 2025.
2
Association Between Short-Term Exposure to Air Pollutants and Emergency Attendance for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Hong Kong: A Time-Series Study.香港短期暴露于空气污染物与上消化道出血急诊就诊之间的关联:一项时间序列研究
Geohealth. 2024 Nov 1;8(11):e2024GH001086. doi: 10.1029/2024GH001086. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Early warning system enables accurate mortality risk prediction for acute gastrointestinal bleeding admitted to intensive care unit.
早期预警系统可准确预测重症监护病房急性胃肠道出血患者的死亡风险。
Intern Emerg Med. 2024 Mar;19(2):511-521. doi: 10.1007/s11739-023-03428-z. Epub 2023 Sep 23.
4
AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score and modified Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score in predicting outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: An accuracy and calibration study.AIMS65、格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德出血评分和改良格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德出血评分对上消化道出血结局的预测作用:一项准确性和校准度研究。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2023 Aug;42(4):496-504. doi: 10.1007/s12664-023-01387-z. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
5
A Review of Risk Scores within Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.上消化道出血风险评分综述
J Clin Med. 2023 May 26;12(11):3678. doi: 10.3390/jcm12113678.
6
Prediction of in-hospital mortality after acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: cross-validation of several risk scoring systems.急性上消化道出血患者住院死亡率的预测:几种风险评分系统的验证。
J Int Med Res. 2022 Mar;50(3):3000605221086442. doi: 10.1177/03000605221086442.
7
Endoscopist's Judgment Is as Useful as Risk Scores for Predicting Outcome in Peptic Ulcer Bleeding: A Multicenter Study.内镜医师的判断在预测消化性溃疡出血结局方面与风险评分同样有用:一项多中心研究。
J Clin Med. 2020 Feb 3;9(2):408. doi: 10.3390/jcm9020408.
8
Scoring systems for upper gastrointestinal bleeding: Which one scores better?上消化道出血的评分系统:哪一种评分效果更佳?
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2019 Apr;38(2):95-97. doi: 10.1007/s12664-019-00945-8.
9
Lower Endoscopic Diagnostic Yields Observed in Non-hematemesis Gastrointestinal Bleeding Patients.非呕血性胃肠道出血患者的内镜下诊断率。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Dec;63(12):3448-3456. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5244-8. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
10
Comparison of four scoring systems for risk stratification of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.上消化道出血风险分层的四种评分系统比较
Pak J Med Sci. 2018 May-Jun;34(3):649-654. doi: 10.12669/pjms.343.14956.