Garrigo J, Danta I, Ahmed T
Division of Pulmonary Disease, University of Miami School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, Florida 33140, USA.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996 May;153(5):1702-7. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.153.5.8630624.
We have previously shown that heparin attenuates allergic bronchoconstriction in sheep, inhibits anti-IgE mediated histamine release in isolated mast cells, and prevents the bronchoconstrictor response in subjects with exercise-induced asthma (EIA). The purpose of the present study was to determine the pharmacokinetics of anti-asthmatic activity of inhaled heparin in EIA and compare it with cromolyn sodium, a mast cell stabilizing agent with established efficacy in EIA. Nine subjects with a history of EIA were studied on 10 different experiment days. After obtaining baseline pulmonary functions on day 1, subjects performed a standardized exercise challenge to document the presence of EIA. While monitoring minute ventilation and heart rate, exercise challenge was performed on a treadmill with increasing workload, until 85% of predicted maximum heart rate was achieved. The subjects then continued the exercise at that workload for 10 min. EIA was assessed by measurements of specific airway conductance (SGaw) before and after exercise. On experiment days 2-10, the exercise challenge was performed after the subjects inhaled 4 ml of either heparin (20,000 u/ml), cromolyn (20 mg), or placebo solutions with increasing pretreatment intervals of 15 min, 1 h, 3 h, or 6 h in a single-blind, randomized fashion. Maximum decreases in SGaw (mean +/- SE) at 3 to 5 min after exercise on control (39 +/- 2.1%) and placebo (37 +/- 2.6%) days were reproducible. Heparin and cromolyn had no effect on baseline SGaw but attenuated the EIA in a time-dependent fashion. Heparin inhibited the bronchoconstrictor responses to exercise by 58%, 78%, and 67% (p < 0.05) when nebulized 15 min, 1 h and 3 h, respectively, before exercise; cromolyn attenuated the responses by 37%, 46%, and 41%, respectively, (p < 0.05). Although heparin offered greater protection than cromolyn (at 1 to 3 h), both agents were ineffective when administered 6 h before exercise. These data demonstrate that inhaled heparin prevents EIA for up to 3 h and is more effective than cromolyn.
我们之前已经表明,肝素可减轻绵羊的过敏性支气管收缩,抑制分离的肥大细胞中抗IgE介导的组胺释放,并预防运动诱发哮喘(EIA)患者的支气管收缩反应。本研究的目的是确定吸入性肝素在EIA中的抗哮喘活性的药代动力学,并将其与色甘酸钠进行比较,色甘酸钠是一种在EIA中已证实有效的肥大细胞稳定剂。在10个不同的实验日对9名有EIA病史的受试者进行了研究。在第1天获得基线肺功能后,受试者进行标准化运动激发试验以证明EIA的存在。在监测分钟通气量和心率的同时,在跑步机上以递增的工作量进行运动激发试验,直至达到预测最大心率的85%。然后受试者在该工作量下继续运动10分钟。通过测量运动前后的特定气道传导率(SGaw)来评估EIA。在实验日2至10,受试者以单盲、随机的方式吸入4毫升肝素(20,000单位/毫升)、色甘酸钠(20毫克)或安慰剂溶液,预处理间隔分别为15分钟、1小时、3小时或6小时增加,之后进行运动激发试验。在对照日(39±2.1%)和安慰剂日(37±2.6%)运动后3至5分钟时,SGaw的最大降低值(平均值±标准误)是可重复的。肝素和色甘酸钠对基线SGaw无影响,但以时间依赖性方式减轻EIA。在运动前分别雾化15分钟、1小时和3小时时,肝素对运动引起的支气管收缩反应的抑制率分别为58%、78%和67%(p<0.05);色甘酸钠对反应的减轻率分别为37%、46%和41%(p<0.05)。尽管肝素(在1至3小时时)比色甘酸钠提供了更大的保护,但在运动前6小时给药时,两种药物均无效。这些数据表明,吸入性肝素可预防EIA长达3小时,且比色甘酸钠更有效。