Abou-Jaoude W A, Sugarman J M, Fallat M E, Casale A J
Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, KY, USA.
J Pediatr Surg. 1996 Jan;31(1):86-9; discussion 90. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(96)90325-5.
Microscopic hematuria (> or = 20) RBCs per high-power field [HPF] has been used frequently as an indicator for genitourinary (GU) tract injury in pediatric cases of blunt trauma. The aim of this study was (1) to determine whether a certain threshold of microscopic hematuria was associated with GU tract injury in our patient population, and (2) to identify additional factors warranting evaluation of the GU tract.
The records of 100 patients under 18 years of age whose discharge diagnosis in the trauma registry included hematuria or GU tract injury were reviewed retrospectively (1989 through 1993). The following data were collected: age, sex, mechanism of injury, physical findings, associated injuries, urinalysis results, radiographic study results, disposition, and outcome. Data were analyzed using the SPSS program.
The majority of children were victims of motor vehicle accidents. All but one study patient had an intravenous pyelogram and/or computed tomography scan. Twenty-seven patients had GU tract injuries or previously unrecognized congenital anomalies (9 contusions, 5 lacerations, 1 vascular pedicle injury, 4 bladder injuries, 3 urethral/vaginal tears, 5 anomalies). Twenty-seven percent (3 of 11) of children with minor injuries and 25% (2 of 8) of those with major injuries had microscopic hematuria of less than 20 RBCs/HPF. Mechanism of injury and hypotenison were not associated with GU tract injury. One third of the patients with isolated chest or abdominal injuries, and 50% of those with combined chest/abdominal injuries had GU tract injuries or anomalies identified. Pelvic fracture was associated with GU tract injury or anomaly in 50% of cases (P < 0.02).
The authors found that (1) a threshold of > or = 20 RBCs/HPF as an indication for radiograph evaluation would have missed 28% of cases with GU tract injuries or occult anomalies, and (2) pelvic fractures and abdominal/chest injuries help to identify patients who require evaluation of the GU tract. The need for GU tract evaluation in pediatric trauma patients is based as much on clinical judgment as on the presence of hematuria.
在儿童钝性创伤病例中,每高倍视野(HPF)镜下血尿(≥20个)红细胞常被用作泌尿生殖道(GU)损伤的指标。本研究的目的是:(1)确定在我们的患者群体中,镜下血尿的特定阈值是否与GU损伤相关;(2)确定需要对GU进行评估的其他因素。
回顾性分析1989年至1993年创伤登记中出院诊断包括血尿或GU损伤的100例18岁以下患者的记录。收集以下数据:年龄、性别、损伤机制、体格检查结果、合并损伤、尿液分析结果、影像学检查结果、处置方式及结局。使用SPSS程序进行数据分析。
大多数儿童是机动车事故的受害者。除一名研究患者外,所有患者均进行了静脉肾盂造影和/或计算机断层扫描。27例患者有GU损伤或先前未被识别的先天性异常(9例挫伤,5例裂伤,1例血管蒂损伤,4例膀胱损伤,3例尿道/阴道撕裂伤,5例异常)。轻伤儿童中有27%(11例中的3例)和重伤儿童中有25%(8例中的2例)镜下血尿少于20个红细胞/HPF。损伤机制和低血压与GU损伤无关。三分之一的单纯胸部或腹部损伤患者以及50%的胸部/腹部联合损伤患者发现有GU损伤或异常。50%的骨盆骨折病例与GU损伤或异常相关(P<0.02)。
作者发现:(1)以≥20个红细胞/HPF作为X线评估指标会漏诊28%的GU损伤或隐匿性异常病例;(2)骨盆骨折以及腹部/胸部损伤有助于识别需要对GU进行评估的患者。儿童创伤患者对GU进行评估的必要性,同样基于临床判断以及血尿的存在。