Brown S L, Haas C, Dinchman K H, Elder J S, Spirnak J P
Department of Urology, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA.
World J Surg. 2001 Dec;25(12):1557-60. doi: 10.1007/s00268-001-0149-6.
As a result of the rapid increase in medical costs, the efficacy of diagnostic imaging is under examination, and efforts have been made to identify patients who may safely be spared radiographic imaging. We reviewed the records of children who presented to our institution with suspected blunt renal injuries to determine if radiographic evaluation is necessary in children with microscopic hematuria and blunt renal trauma. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 1200 children (ages less than 18 years) who sustained blunt abdominal trauma and who presented to our level I pediatric trauma center between 1995 and 1997. Urinalysis was performed in 299 patients (25%). Urinalysis results were correlated with findings on abdominal computed tomography (CT). All patients had more than three red blood cells per high power field (RBC/ hpf) or gross hematuria. Renal injuries were graded according to the injury scale defined by the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma. Sixty-five patients had microscopic hematuria. Thirty-five (54%) were evaluated with an abdominal CT scan. Three patients sustained significant renal injuries (grade II-V), and 32 patients had normal findings or renal contusions. Therefore only 3 of 65 patients (4.6%) sustained a significant renal injury. All three patients had other associated major organ injuries. Of the three patients with gross hematuria evaluated with abdominal CT, one (33%) sustained a significant renal injury and had no associated injuries. The degree of hematuria did not correlate with the grade of renal injury. Pediatric patients with blunt trauma, microscopic hematuria, and no associated injuries do not require radiologic evaluation, as significant renal injuries are unlikely. However, children who present with associated injuries and microscopic hematuria after blunt trauma may have significant renal injuries and should undergo radiologic evaluation.
由于医疗成本的迅速增加,诊断性成像的功效正在接受审查,人们已努力确定哪些患者可以安全地免于进行放射成像检查。我们回顾了因疑似钝性肾损伤而到我院就诊的儿童记录,以确定对于镜下血尿和钝性肾外伤的儿童是否有必要进行放射学评估。我们回顾性分析了1995年至1997年间在我院一级儿科创伤中心就诊的1200名遭受钝性腹部创伤的儿童(年龄小于18岁)的病历。对299名患者(25%)进行了尿液分析。尿液分析结果与腹部计算机断层扫描(CT)结果相关。所有患者每高倍视野红细胞数均超过3个(RBC/hpf)或肉眼血尿。根据美国创伤外科协会定义的损伤分级标准对肾损伤进行分级。65名患者有镜下血尿。35名(54%)患者接受了腹部CT扫描。3名患者遭受了严重肾损伤(II-V级),32名患者检查结果正常或有肾挫伤。因此,65名患者中只有3名(4.6%)遭受了严重肾损伤。所有3名患者均有其他相关的主要器官损伤。在接受腹部CT检查的3名肉眼血尿患者中,1名(33%)遭受了严重肾损伤且无相关损伤。血尿程度与肾损伤分级无关。钝性创伤、镜下血尿且无相关损伤的儿科患者不需要进行放射学评估,因为不太可能有严重肾损伤。然而,钝性创伤后伴有相关损伤和镜下血尿的儿童可能有严重肾损伤,应进行放射学评估。