Suppr超能文献

对双翅目和膜翅目昆虫同时存在过敏反应。

Coexistent anaphylaxis to Diptera and Hymenoptera.

作者信息

Freye H B, Litwin C

出版信息

Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1996 Mar;76(3):270-2. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63440-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anaphylaxis to the bite of Diptera and specifically the bite of the Tabanidae family (horsefly) have been sparsely documented. The coexistent hypersensitivity to both the order Diptera and Hymenoptera has not been documented.

METHODS

We present a patient who experienced anaphylaxis to both insect species. Venom skin testing and RAST revealed sensitivity to several members of the Hymenoptera order. Prick, intradermal and RAST with whole body extracts of Tabanidae species is also documented in this patient. Twenty patients who are sensitive to Hymenoptera and have been bitten by horseflies but have had no reaction to the horsefly bite were used as controls.

RESULTS

An anaphylactic reaction to horsefly bite has been documented in a 56-year-old white male. This patient also demonstrated evidence of anaphylactic reaction to Hymenoptera envenomation. In controls consisting of 20 patients with Hymenoptera sensitivity, there was no clinical history of reaction to horsefly bite despite the presence of positive prick and/or positive intradermal tests and/or positive RAST to mixed Tabanidae species extract.

CONCLUSIONS

Skin testing to horsefly by prick and/or intradermal testing using whole body insect extract is not useful in making a diagnosis of Tabanidae hypersensitivity. RAST using Tabanidae species as antigen is similarly useless in making a diagnosis of Tabanidae hypersensitivity. In vivo and in vitro diagnosis of horsefly hypersensitivity may be achieved when the salivary gland antigen of the horsefly becomes available.

摘要

背景

对双翅目昆虫叮咬,特别是虻科(马蝇)叮咬发生过敏反应的记录很少。对双翅目和膜翅目同时存在过敏反应的情况尚未见报道。

方法

我们报告一名对这两种昆虫都发生过敏反应的患者。毒液皮肤试验和放射变应原吸附试验显示对膜翅目多个成员敏感。该患者还进行了用虻科物种全虫提取物的点刺、皮内试验和放射变应原吸附试验。选取20名对膜翅目敏感且被马蝇叮咬但对马蝇叮咬无反应的患者作为对照。

结果

一名56岁白人男性被记录到对马蝇叮咬发生过敏反应。该患者也有对膜翅目昆虫毒液过敏反应的证据。在由20名对膜翅目敏感的患者组成的对照组中,尽管对混合虻科物种提取物的点刺试验和/或皮内试验和/或放射变应原吸附试验呈阳性,但没有对马蝇叮咬发生反应的临床病史。

结论

使用昆虫全虫提取物通过点刺和/或皮内试验对马蝇进行皮肤试验,对诊断虻科过敏反应没有帮助。以虻科物种为抗原的放射变应原吸附试验在诊断虻科过敏反应方面同样无用。当获得马蝇唾液腺抗原时,可能实现对马蝇过敏反应的体内和体外诊断。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验