• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

仅使用盒状树脂复合材料修复体的两年期结果。

Two-year results with box-only resin composite restorations.

作者信息

Kreulen C M, van Amerongen W E, Akerboom H B, Borgmeijer P J

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), The Netherlands.

出版信息

ASDC J Dent Child. 1995 Nov-Dec;62(6):395-400.

PMID:8636474
Abstract

One of the restorative alternatives in the treatment of proximal carious lesions is the box-only approach. This paper describes baseline and two-year results with 68 box-only resin composite restorations in a clinical study. The restorations were made using a glass ionomer cement as a dentin replacement and a bevelled outline. In terms of treatment time (32 minutes) and postoperative sensitivity (4 cases), the box-only restorations show favorable properties in comparison to conventional Class II resin composite restorations. At the two-year assessment no failures were observed, with fair results regarding clinical characteristics. It is concluded that, although applied to a limited number of teeth, the results indicate that the box-only approach with resin composites may make a contribution to the tooth-tissue-saving, restorative techniques.

摘要

治疗近端龋损的修复替代方法之一是仅制备盒状洞形法。本文描述了一项临床研究中68个仅制备盒状洞形的树脂复合材料修复体的基线情况和两年随访结果。这些修复体采用玻璃离子水门汀作为牙本质替代材料,并制备成斜面边缘。在治疗时间(32分钟)和术后敏感情况(4例)方面,与传统II类树脂复合材料修复体相比,仅制备盒状洞形的修复体显示出良好的性能。在两年的评估中未观察到失败病例,临床特征方面结果尚可。得出的结论是,尽管应用于有限数量的牙齿,但结果表明仅制备盒状洞形的树脂复合材料修复方法可能有助于节省牙体组织的修复技术。

相似文献

1
Two-year results with box-only resin composite restorations.仅使用盒状树脂复合材料修复体的两年期结果。
ASDC J Dent Child. 1995 Nov-Dec;62(6):395-400.
2
Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin-composite restorations.关于深咬合树脂复合材料修复中未使用玻璃离子衬层引发的术后牙髓并发症的两年临床研究。
J Investig Clin Dent. 2013 Nov;4(4):265-70. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-1626.2012.00160.x. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
3
A two-year comparison of resin-based composite tunnel and Class II restorations in a randomized controlled trial.一项随机对照试验中树脂基复合树脂隧道修复和Ⅱ类洞修复的两年比较。
Am J Dent. 2004 Aug;17(4):253-6.
4
Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.有或没有树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀衬层的后牙树脂复合树脂修复体:一项为期1年的随机临床试验。
J Investig Clin Dent. 2011 Feb;2(1):63-9. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-1626.2010.00036.x. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
5
Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.乳牙粘结修复的随机临床试验。18个月的结果。
Am J Dent. 2013 Dec;26(6):351-5.
6
Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.四种聚酸改性树脂复合材料和一种树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀用于Ⅴ类洞修复的两年临床评估
Quintessence Int. 2002 Jul-Aug;33(7):542-8.
7
A clinical evaluation of a giomer restorative system containing surface prereacted glass ionomer filler: results from a 13-year recall examination.含表面预反应玻璃离子填料的聚硅氧烷修复系统的临床评估:13年随访检查结果
J Am Dent Assoc. 2014 Oct;145(10):1036-43. doi: 10.14219/jada.2014.57.
8
A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.传统设计的中小尺寸Ⅱ类洞型中汞合金与树脂复合体修复体的边缘及内部适应性比较。
Quintessence Int. 2000 May;31(5):347-52.
9
Clinical evaluation of three restorative materials applied in a minimal intervention caries treatment approach.三种修复材料应用于微创龋病治疗方法的临床评估
J Public Health Dent. 2003 Fall;63(4):221-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2003.tb03503.x.
10
An in vitro study on the secondary caries-prevention properties of three restorative materials.三种修复材料抗继发龋性能的体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Nov;110(5):363-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.06.011. Epub 2013 Aug 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of the bond strength of posterior composite with different cavity configurations and different liners using a two-step etch and rinse adhesive system: study.使用两步蚀刻和冲洗粘结系统对具有不同窝洞形态和不同衬层的后牙复合材料粘结强度的比较评估:研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2017 May-Jun;20(3):166-169. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_66_16.