Vellenga E, Uyl-de Groot C A, de Wit R, Keizer H J, Löwenberg B, ten Haaft M A, de Witte T J, Verhagen C A, Stoter G J, Rutten F F, Mulder N H, Smid W M, de Vries E G
Department of Hematology, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Clin Oncol. 1996 Feb;14(2):619-27. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.2.619.
To determine whether granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) used in addition to standard inpatient antibiotic therapy shortens the period of hospitalization due to chemotherapy-induced neutropenic fever.
One hundred thirty-four patients with a hematologic (n = 47) or solid tumor (n = 87) who had severe neutropenia (< 0.5 x 10(9)/L) and fever (> 38.5 degrees C once or > 38 degrees C twice over a 12-hour observation period) were randomly assigned to receive GM-CSF 5 micrograms/kg/d (n = 65) or placebo (n = 69) in conjunction with broad-spectrum antibiotics for a minimum of 4 days and a maximum of 14 days. GM-CSF/placebo and antibiotics were stopped if the neutrophil count was greater than 1.0 x 10(9)/L and temperature less than 37.5 degrees C during 2 consecutive days, or for a leukocyte count > or = 10 x 10(9)/L, both followed by a 24-hour observation period (hospitalization period).
Compared with placebo, GM-CSF enhanced neutrophil recovery. Median neutrophil counts at day 4 were 2.5 x 10(9)/L (range, 0 to 25) in the GM-CSF arm and 1.3 x 10(9)/L (range, 0 to 9) in the placebo arm (P < .001). No significant difference was observed with regard to median number of days with less than 1.0 x 10(9)/L neutrophils (4 v 4) or days of fever (3 v 3). The median number of days patients were hospitalized while on study was comparable in the GM-CSF and placebo groups at 6 (range, 3 to 14) versus 7 (range, 4 to 14), respectively, according to an intention-to-treat analysis (P = .27). Quality-of-life scores in 90 patients demonstrated significant differences in favor of the placebo group. Hospital costs were significantly higher for GM-CSF-treated patients if GM-CSF was included in the price (median costs, $4,140 [US] for GM-CSF v $590 for placebo; P < .05).
These results indicate that GM-CSF does not affect the number of days for resolution of fever or the hospitalization period for this patient group, although a significant effect of GM-CSF was observed on neutrophil recovery.
确定在标准住院抗生素治疗基础上加用粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(GM-CSF)是否能缩短化疗所致中性粒细胞减少性发热患者的住院时间。
134例血液系统疾病(n = 47)或实体瘤(n = 87)患者,伴有严重中性粒细胞减少(< 0.5×10⁹/L)且发热(在12小时观察期内体温> 38.5℃ 1次或> 38℃ 2次),被随机分配接受GM-CSF 5微克/千克/天(n = 65)或安慰剂(n = 69),同时联合使用广谱抗生素至少4天,最长14天。如果中性粒细胞计数连续2天大于1.0×10⁹/L且体温低于37.5℃,或者白细胞计数≥10×10⁹/L,随后进行24小时观察期(住院期),则停用GM-CSF/安慰剂和抗生素。
与安慰剂相比,GM-CSF可促进中性粒细胞恢复。GM-CSF组第4天的中性粒细胞计数中位数为2.5×10⁹/L(范围0至25),安慰剂组为1.3×10⁹/L(范围0至9)(P < 0.001)。中性粒细胞计数低于1.0×10⁹/L的天数中位数(4对4)或发热天数(3对3)无显著差异。根据意向性分析,GM-CSF组和安慰剂组患者在研究期间的住院天数中位数相当,分别为6天(范围3至14天)和7天(范围4至14天)(P = 0.27)。90例患者的生活质量评分显示,安慰剂组有显著优势。如果将GM-CSF的价格计算在内,GM-CSF治疗患者的住院费用显著更高(GM-CSF组中位数费用为4140美元[美国],安慰剂组为590美元;P < 0.05)。
这些结果表明,GM-CSF虽对中性粒细胞恢复有显著作用,但不影响该患者群体的退热天数或住院时间。