Maher D W, Lieschke G J, Green M, Bishop J, Stuart-Harris R, Wolf M, Sheridan W P, Kefford R F, Cebon J, Olver I, McKendrick J, Toner G, Bradstock K, Lieschke M, Cruickshank S, Tomita D K, Hoffman E W, Fox R M, Morstyn G
Melbourne Tumor Biology Branch, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Victoria, Australia.
Ann Intern Med. 1994 Oct 1;121(7):492-501. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-121-7-199410010-00004.
To determine if filgrastim (recombinant human methionyl granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) used in addition to standard inpatient antibiotic therapy accelerated recovery from infection associated with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Hematology and oncology wards of four teaching hospitals.
218 patients with cancer who had fever (temperature > 38.2 degrees C) and neutropenia (neutrophil count < 1.0 x 10(9)/L) after chemotherapy.
Patients were randomly assigned to receive filgrastim (12 micrograms/kg of body weight per day) (n = 109) or placebo (n = 107) beginning within 12 hours of empiric therapy with tobramycin and piperacillin. Patients received treatment and remained in the study until the neutrophil count was greater than 0.5 x 10(9)/L and until 4 days without fever (temperature < 37.5 degrees C) had elapsed.
Days of neutropenia and fever and days in the study (hospitalization); time to resolution of fever and febrile neutropenia; and frequency of the use of alternative antibiotics.
Compared with placebo, filgrastim reduced the median number of days of neutropenia (3.0 compared with 4.0 days of a neutrophil count of < 0.5 x 10(9)/L; P = 0.005) and the time to resolution of febrile neutropenia (5.0 compared with 6.0 days; P = 0.01) but not days of fever (3.0 days for both groups). The frequency of the use of alternative antibiotics was similar in the two groups (46% compared with 41%; P = 0.48). The median number of days patients were hospitalized while on study was the same (8.0 days; P = 0.09); however, filgrastim decreased the risk for prolonged hospitalization (> 11 days, 4th quartile) by half (relative risk, 2.1 [95% CI, 1.1 to 4.1]; P = 0.02). In exploratory subset analyses, filgrastim appeared to provide the greatest benefit in patients with documented infection and in patients presenting with neutrophil counts of less than 0.1 x 10(9)/L.
Filgrastim treatment used with antibiotics at the onset of febrile neutropenia in patients with cancer who have received chemotherapy accelerated neutrophil recovery and shortened the duration of febrile neutropenia.
确定在标准住院抗生素治疗基础上加用非格司亭(重组人甲硫氨酰粒细胞集落刺激因子)是否能加速化疗所致中性粒细胞减少相关感染的恢复。
随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
四家教学医院的血液科和肿瘤科病房。
218例化疗后出现发热(体温>38.2℃)和中性粒细胞减少(中性粒细胞计数<1.0×10⁹/L)的癌症患者。
患者在开始使用妥布霉素和哌拉西林经验性治疗的12小时内被随机分配接受非格司亭(每日12微克/千克体重)(n = 109)或安慰剂(n = 107)。患者接受治疗并留在研究中,直到中性粒细胞计数大于0.5×10⁹/L且无发热(体温<37.5℃)持续4天。
中性粒细胞减少和发热天数以及研究期间(住院)天数;发热和发热性中性粒细胞减少的缓解时间;以及使用替代抗生素的频率。
与安慰剂相比,非格司亭减少了中性粒细胞减少的中位数天数(中性粒细胞计数<0.5×10⁹/L时,分别为3.0天和4.0天;P = 0.005)以及发热性中性粒细胞减少的缓解时间(分别为5.0天和6.0天;P = 0.01),但未减少发热天数(两组均为3.0天)。两组使用替代抗生素的频率相似(分别为46%和41%;P = 0.48)。患者在研究期间住院的中位数天数相同(8.0天;P = 0.09);然而,非格司亭将延长住院时间(>11天,第4四分位数)的风险降低了一半(相对风险,2.1[95%CI,1.1至4.1];P = 0.02)。在探索性亚组分析中,非格司亭似乎在有记录感染的患者以及中性粒细胞计数低于0.1×10⁹/L的患者中提供了最大益处。
在接受化疗的癌症发热性中性粒细胞减少患者中,发热性中性粒细胞减少发作时使用抗生素联合非格司亭治疗可加速中性粒细胞恢复并缩短发热性中性粒细胞减少的持续时间。