Freifeld Alison, Sankaranarayanan Jayashri, Ullrich Fred, Sun Junfeng
Department of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-5400, USA.
Support Care Cancer. 2008 Feb;16(2):181-91. doi: 10.1007/s00520-007-0308-x. Epub 2007 Oct 18.
The purpose of the study was to determine oncologists' current practice patterns for antibiotic management of low-risk fever and neutropenia (FN) after chemotherapy.
A self-administered survey was developed to query management practices for low-risk FN patients and sent to 3,600 randomly selected American Society of Clinical Oncology physician members; hypothetical case scenarios were included to assess factors influencing decisions about outpatient treatment.
Of 3,560 actively practicing oncologists, 1,207 replied (34%). Outpatient antibiotics are used by 82% for selected low-risk FN patients (27% used in them >65% of their patients). Oral levofloxacin (50%), ciprofloxacin (36%), and ciprofloxacin plus amoxicillin/clavulanate (35%) are common outpatient regimens. Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis is used by 45% of oncologists, in a subset of afebrile patients at low risk for FN; growth factors are used adjunctively by 48% for treating low-risk FN. Factors associated with choosing outpatient treatment were: frequency of use in oncologists' own practices, absence of hematologic malignancy, lower patient age, no infiltrate on X-ray, no prior serious infection, shorter expected FN duration, lower creatinine levels, and shorter distance of patient's residence from the hospital.
US oncologists, who responded are willing to prescribe outpatient oral antibiotic treatment for low-risk FN, although practices vary considerably and are based on favorable clinical factors. However, practices are often employed that are not recommended for low-risk patients by current guidelines, including fluoroquinolone prophylaxis, adjunctive and/or prophylactic growth factors, and use of levofloxacin for empiric therapy. Educational efforts are needed to better guide cost-effective and supportive care.
本研究旨在确定肿瘤学家目前对化疗后低风险发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)进行抗生素管理的实践模式。
设计了一项自填式调查问卷,以询问低风险FN患者的管理实践,并发送给3600名随机选择的美国临床肿瘤学会医生会员;纳入了假设病例场景以评估影响门诊治疗决策的因素。
在3560名在职肿瘤学家中,1207人回复(34%)。82%的医生会为选定的低风险FN患者使用门诊抗生素(其中27%的患者中>65%的患者使用)。口服左氧氟沙星(50%)、环丙沙星(36%)以及环丙沙星加阿莫西林/克拉维酸(35%)是常见的门诊治疗方案。45%的肿瘤学家在一部分低风险FN发热患者中使用氟喹诺酮预防用药;48%的医生在治疗低风险FN时辅助使用生长因子。与选择门诊治疗相关的因素包括:肿瘤学家自身实践中的使用频率、无血液系统恶性肿瘤、患者年龄较小、X线无浸润、无既往严重感染、预期FN持续时间较短、肌酐水平较低以及患者居住地距医院距离较短。
回复的美国肿瘤学家愿意为低风险FN患者开具门诊口服抗生素治疗,尽管实践差异很大且基于有利的临床因素。然而,目前指南不推荐用于低风险患者采用的实践方法仍经常被采用,包括氟喹诺酮预防用药、辅助和/或预防性使用生长因子以及使用左氧氟沙星进行经验性治疗。需要开展教育工作以更好地指导具有成本效益的支持性护理。