Horneland M
Avdeling Stavanger, Rogaland psykiatriske sjukehus.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1996 Jan 30;116(3):392-4.
The author describes experience from regular half-yearly evaluations carried out since 1988 at the psychiatric department in Stavanger. The head of the department, the chief psychiatrist on the resident's ward, the psychotherapy instructor, the resident and the leader of the education committee take part in these 45 minute long meetings. A report is written after each evaluation. This is used as a basis for the candidate's certification from the department. All participants find the half-yearly evaluations rewarding. Weak and strong aspects of the candidate and her/his progress, the education programme and the quality of the instruction can be discussed. In the end a plan is prepared for the education during the next six months for the particular candidate. The persons in charge find half-yearly evaluations especially useful when a candidate is not found to be suited for this particular speciality. When several share this opinion it is also easier to get the candidates themselves to understand and accept the situation. We warmly recommend this arrangement for other specialities too.
作者描述了自1988年以来在斯塔万格精神病科进行的定期半年评估的经验。科室主任、住院病房的主任医师、心理治疗导师、住院医生以及教育委员会负责人参加这些时长45分钟的会议。每次评估后都会撰写一份报告。这被用作该科室对候选人进行认证的依据。所有参与者都认为半年评估很有意义。可以讨论候选人的优缺点及其进展、教育计划和指导质量。最后为特定候选人制定未来六个月的教育计划。负责人发现，当发现候选人不适合该特定专业时，半年评估特别有用。当有几个人持相同意见时，也更容易让候选人自己理解并接受这种情况。我们也热烈推荐其他专业采用这种安排。
