Suppr超能文献

[经静脉心脏复律除颤器:植入及随访的临床经验]

[Transvenous cardioverter-defibrillators: clinical experience at implantation and follow-up].

作者信息

Boriani G, Frabetti L, Capucci A, Galli R, Parlapiano M, Biffi M, Sabbatani P, Spedicato L, Bronzetti G, Pierangeli A

机构信息

Istituto di Malattie dell'Apparato Cardiovascolare, Policlinico S Orsola-Malpighi, Università degli Studi, Bologna.

出版信息

Cardiologia. 1995 Jun;40(6):381-9.

PMID:8640850
Abstract

Thirty-seven patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias refractory to antiarrhythmic drug treatment, guided by electrophysiological testing, were submitted to implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator by the transvenous technique. Mean age was 55 +/- 14 years and the underlying heart disease was coronary heart disease in 24 patients, cardiomyopathy or other etiologies in 11 patients. In 2 patients ventricular arrhythmias were idiopathic. Left ventricular ejection fraction was < or equal to 40% in 65% of the patients. The following devices were implanted: CPI Ventak P in 2 patients, Ventak P2 in 9 patients, Ventak PRx in 9 patients, Ventak PRxII in 2 patients, Telectronics Guardian ATP III 4215 in 9 patients, Siemens Siecure in 5 patients, Medtronic Jewel PCD in 1 patient. At implantation defibrillation threshold was lower with biphasic shocks than with monophasic shocks (17.0 +/- 3.2 vs 20.9 +/- 3.8 J, p < 0.003) and the need for subcutaneous patches was lower when biphasic shocks were employed. Operative and perioperative mortality were 0% and no significant complications were observed. During the follow-up (16 +/- 11 months) 35% of the patients had appropriate shocks and 93% of the patients with antitachycardia pacing availability (n = 15) had effective antitachycardia pacing interventions. The following complications were observed: lead failure in 4 patients (3 insulation breaks and 1 elongation for stretching), late lead dislodgement in 2 patients, lead recall in 1 patient, all of which required reintervention. Inappropriate shocks occurred in 30% of the patients and were related to lead failure, supraventricular arrhythmias or alternating current interference. During the follow-up one patient died of sudden death and one was submitted to heart transplantation. In conclusion, implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator by the transvenous technique is a procedure relatively free from complications. During the follow-up lead failure appears to be one of the most relevant complications. Antitachycardia pacing allows effective termination of ventricular tachycardias without cardioversion, with a better compliance.

摘要

37例对抗心律失常药物治疗无效的室性快速心律失常患者,在电生理检查的指导下,采用经静脉技术植入心脏转复除颤器。平均年龄为55±14岁,基础心脏病为冠心病24例,心肌病或其他病因11例。2例室性心律失常为特发性。65%的患者左心室射血分数≤40%。植入了以下装置:2例植入CPI Ventak P,9例植入Ventak P2,9例植入Ventak PRx,2例植入Ventak PRxII,9例植入Telectronics Guardian ATP III 4215,5例植入西门子Siecure,1例植入美敦力Jewel PCD。植入时,双相电击的除颤阈值低于单相电击(17.0±3.2 J对20.9±3.8 J,p<0.003),采用双相电击时皮下贴片的需求较低。手术和围手术期死亡率为0%,未观察到明显并发症。在随访期间(16±11个月),35%的患者接受了适当的电击,93%具备抗心动过速起搏功能的患者(n = 15)进行了有效的抗心动过速起搏干预。观察到以下并发症:4例导线故障(3例绝缘破损和1例因拉伸而延长),2例晚期导线脱位,1例导线召回,所有这些均需要再次干预。30%的患者发生不适当电击,与导线故障、室上性心律失常或交流电干扰有关。随访期间1例患者猝死,1例接受心脏移植。总之,经静脉技术植入心脏转复除颤器是一种并发症相对较少的手术。随访期间,导线故障似乎是最相关的并发症之一。抗心动过速起搏可有效终止室性心动过速而无需转复,依从性更好。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验