Nitzsche E U, Choi Y, Czernin J, Hoh C K, Huang S C, Schelbert H R
Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA School of Medicine 90095-1735, USA.
Circulation. 1996 Jun 1;93(11):2000-6. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.93.11.2000.
[13N]Ammonia has been validated in dog studies as a myocardial blood flow tracer. Estimates of myocardial blood flow by [13N]ammonia were highly linearly correlated to those by the microsphere and blood sample techniques. However, estimates of myocardial blood flow with [13N]ammonia in humans have not yet been compared with those by an independent technique. This study therefore tested the hypothesis that the [13N]ammonia positron emission tomographic technique in humans gives estimates of myocardial blood flow comparable to those obtained with the [15O]water technique.
A total of 30 pairs of positron emission tomographic flow measurements were performed in 30 healthy volunteers; 15 volunteers were studied at rest and 15 during adenosine-induced hypermia. Estimates of average and of regional myocardial blood flow by the [13N]ammonia and the [15O]water approaches correlated well (y = 0.02 + 1.02x, r = .99, P < .001 SEE = 0.023 for average and y = 0.06 + 1.00x, r = .97, P < .001, SEE = 0.025 for regional values) over a flow range of 0.45 to 4.74 mL.min-1.g-1. At rest, mean myocardial blood flow was 0.64 +/- 0.09 mL.min-1.g-1 for [13N]ammonia and 0.66 +/- 0.12 mL.min-1.g-1 for [15O]water (P = NS). For adenosine-induced hyperemia, mean myocardial blood flow was 2.63 +/- 0.75 mL.min-1.g-1 for [13N]ammonia and 2.73 +/- 0.77 mL.min-1.g-1 for [15O]water (P = NS). The coefficient of variation as an index of the observed heterogeneity of myocardial blood flow averaged, for [13N]ammonia, 9 +/- 4% at rest and 12 +/- 7% during stress and, for [15O]water, 14 +/- 11% at rest and 16 +/- 9% during stress. The coefficients of variation for [15O]water were significantly higher than those for [13N]ammonia (P = .004 at rest and P = .03 during stress).
The two approaches yield comparable estimates of myocardial blood flow in humans, which supports the validity of the [13N]ammonia method in human myocardium previously shown only in animals. However, the [15O]water approach reveals a greater heterogeneity (presumably method-related), which might limit the accuracy of sectorial myocardial blood flow estimates in humans.
[13N]氨已在犬类研究中被验证为一种心肌血流示踪剂。用[13N]氨估算的心肌血流与用微球和血样技术估算的结果高度线性相关。然而,人类用[13N]氨估算的心肌血流尚未与独立技术的估算结果进行比较。因此,本研究检验了以下假设:人类的[13N]氨正电子发射断层扫描技术所估算的心肌血流与用[15O]水技术获得的结果相当。
对30名健康志愿者进行了30对正电子发射断层扫描血流测量;15名志愿者在静息状态下接受研究,15名在腺苷诱发的充血状态下接受研究。[13N]氨和[15O]水方法估算的平均和区域心肌血流相关性良好(平均血流:y = 0.02 + 1.02x,r = 0.99,P < 0.001,SEE = 0.023;区域血流:y = 0.06 + 1.00x,r = 0.97,P < 0.001,SEE = 0.025),血流范围为0.45至4.74 mL·min-1·g-1。静息时,[13N]氨的平均心肌血流为0.64±0.09 mL·min-1·g-1,[15O]水为0.66±0.12 mL·min-1·g-1(P = 无显著差异)。对于腺苷诱发的充血,[13N]氨的平均心肌血流为2.63±0.75 mL·min-1·g-1,[15O]水为2.73±0.77 mL·min-1·g-1(P = 无显著差异)。作为观察到的心肌血流异质性指标的变异系数,[13N]氨在静息时平均为9±4%,应激时为12±7%;[15O]水在静息时为14±11%,应激时为16±9%。[15O]水的变异系数显著高于[13N]氨(静息时P = 0.004,应激时P = 0.03)。
两种方法在人类中对心肌血流的估算结果相当,这支持了[13N]氨方法在人类心肌中的有效性,此前该方法仅在动物中得到证实。然而,[15O]水方法显示出更大的异质性(可能与方法相关),这可能会限制人类扇形心肌血流估算的准确性。