Beals R K, Tower S S
Division of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, USA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Jun(327):238-46. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199606000-00029.
A retrospective review of 93 periprosthetic fractures and 102 periprosthetic fracture treatments showed that the type of prosthesis (cemented, ingrowth, Austin-Moore) and the presence of preexisting stress risers play a role in determining where the fractures occur. The site of fracture and the prefracture interface influence treatment of periprosthetic fractures. This study suggests that fractures associated with a loose interface, cemented or cementless, are best treated by removal of the prosthesis, reduction of the fracture, and insertion of a long stemmed prosthesis with additional fixation as needed. Treatment of a periprosthetic fracture associated with a stable prosthesis depends on the site of fracture. Fractures proximal to the tip of a fixed prosthesis usually can be treated nonoperatively or with limited internal fixation. Fractures at the tip of the prosthesis may be managed by revision or internal fixation, and fractures below the prosthesis can be managed operatively or nonoperatively.
对93例假体周围骨折及102例假体周围骨折治疗的回顾性研究表明,假体类型(骨水泥型、骨长入型、奥斯汀-摩尔型)及既往应力集中的存在对骨折发生部位有影响。骨折部位及骨折前界面会影响假体周围骨折的治疗。本研究提示,与松动界面相关的骨折,无论骨水泥型或非骨水泥型,最佳治疗方法是取出假体、复位骨折,并根据需要植入带额外固定的长柄假体。与稳定假体相关的假体周围骨折的治疗取决于骨折部位。固定假体尖端近端的骨折通常可采用非手术治疗或有限内固定。假体尖端的骨折可通过翻修或内固定处理,假体下方的骨折可采用手术或非手术治疗。