Donaldson G
Psychology Department, York University, Ontario, Canada.
J Hist Behav Sci. 1996 Apr;32(2):160-76. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6696(199604)32:2<160::AID-JHBS4>3.0.CO;2-#.
An examination of the early history of child analysis in the writings of Melanie Klein and Anna Freud reveals how two different and opposing approaches to child analysis arose at the same time. The two methods of child analysis are rooted in a differential emphasis on psychoanalytic theory and practice. The Kleinian method derives from the application of technique while the Anna Freudian method is driven by theory. Furthermore, by holding to the Freudian theory of child development Anna Freud was forced to limit the scope of child analysis, while Klein's application of Freudian practice has led to new discoveries about the development of the infant psyche.
对梅兰妮·克莱因和安娜·弗洛伊德著作中儿童精神分析早期历史的考察揭示了两种不同且对立的儿童精神分析方法是如何同时出现的。这两种儿童精神分析方法源于对精神分析理论与实践的不同侧重。克莱因派方法源自技术的应用,而安娜·弗洛伊德派方法则由理论驱动。此外,由于坚持弗洛伊德的儿童发展理论,安娜·弗洛伊德被迫限制了儿童精神分析的范围,而克莱因对弗洛伊德实践的应用则带来了关于婴儿心理发展的新发现。