• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋臼翻修术中骨水泥型股骨假体的取出与重新植入。

Removal and reinsertion of cemented femoral components during acetabular revision.

作者信息

Nabors E D, Liebelt R, Mattingly D A, Bierbaum B E

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, MA 02120, USA.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 1996 Feb;11(2):146-52. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(05)80008-7.

DOI:10.1016/s0883-5403(05)80008-7
PMID:8648307
Abstract

A retrospective review examined all patients who underwent removal and reinsertion of a cemented femoral component during isolated acetabular revision by one surgeon since 1981. All components were reinserted into the original, intact cement mantle. Forty-two hips with 2- to 10-year follow-up periods were reviewed. Average follow-up period since revision was 67 months. Average followup period since index procedure was 191 months. Average Harris hip score increased from 61 before surgery to 90 at follow-up examination. Two femurs are definitely loose by Harris criteria, but both are asymptomatic. One solidly fixed femoral component was revised because of joint instability. Two hips have postrevision cement fractures. One patient has mild thigh pain. In vitro testing of eight cadaver hips showed no increase in rotational micromotion following removal and reinsertion. It is concluded that this technique aids in isolated acetabular revision surgery by avoiding the complications of trochanteric osteotomy and femoral revision, improving acetabular exposure, and decreasing operative time with minimal risk of disrupting femoral component fixation.

摘要

一项回顾性研究调查了自1981年以来由一位外科医生在单纯髋臼翻修术中进行骨水泥型股骨假体取出并重新植入的所有患者。所有假体均重新植入到原来完整的骨水泥壳中。对42例随访2至10年的髋关节进行了评估。翻修术后的平均随访时间为67个月。初次手术以来的平均随访时间为191个月。Harris髋关节评分平均从术前的61分提高到随访时的90分。根据Harris标准,有两根股骨肯定松动,但均无症状。一个牢固固定的股骨假体因关节不稳而进行了翻修。两例髋关节出现翻修术后骨水泥骨折。一名患者有轻度大腿疼痛。对八个尸体髋关节进行的体外测试显示,取出并重新植入后旋转微动没有增加。得出的结论是,该技术通过避免转子截骨术和股骨翻修的并发症、改善髋臼暴露以及减少手术时间,同时将破坏股骨假体固定的风险降至最低,有助于单纯髋臼翻修手术。

相似文献

1
Removal and reinsertion of cemented femoral components during acetabular revision.髋臼翻修术中骨水泥型股骨假体的取出与重新植入。
J Arthroplasty. 1996 Feb;11(2):146-52. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(05)80008-7.
2
Revision of a failed cemented total hip prosthesis with insertion of an acetabular component without cement and a femoral component with cement. A five to eight-year follow-up study.翻修失败的骨水泥型全髋关节假体,植入非骨水泥髋臼组件和骨水泥股骨组件。一项为期五至八年的随访研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Jul;78(7):982-94. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199607000-00002.
3
The fate of stable cemented acetabular components retained during revision of a femoral component of a total hip arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术股骨部件翻修时保留的稳定骨水泥髋臼部件的转归。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Dec;81(12):1682-91. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199912000-00005.
4
Revision of the acetabular component without cement after a previous acetabular reconstruction with use of a bulk femoral head graft in patients who had congenital dislocation or dysplasia. A follow-up note.在先前使用大块股骨头移植进行髋臼重建的先天性脱位或发育不良患者中,非骨水泥髋臼组件的翻修。随访记录。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Dec;81(12):1703-6. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199912000-00007.
5
Primary total hip replacement with insertion of an acetabular component without cement and a femoral component with cement. Follow-up study at an average of six years.初次全髋关节置换术,植入非骨水泥髋臼组件和骨水泥股骨组件。平均六年的随访研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 May;78(5):698-705. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199605000-00009.
6
Primary hybrid total hip replacement, performed with insertion of the acetabular component without cement and a precoat femoral component with cement. An average ten-year follow-up study.初次混合式全髋关节置换术,髋臼组件非骨水泥植入,股骨组件预涂骨水泥。平均十年随访研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Feb;81(2):247-55. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199902000-00012.
7
Revision of the acetabular component with an uncemented Harris-Galante porous-coated prosthesis.使用非骨水泥型Harris-Galante多孔涂层假体对髋臼部件进行翻修。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992 Aug;74(7):987-94.
8
The fate of well fixed cemented femoral components left in place at the time of revision of the acetabular component.在髋臼部件翻修时留在原位的固定良好的骨水泥型股骨部件的转归。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 May;79(5):701-6. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199705000-00009.
9
A well-fixed femoral stem facing a failed acetabular component: to exchange or not? A 5- to 15-year follow-up study.股骨柄固定良好但面对失败的髋臼部件:是否需要更换?一项 5 至 15 年的随访研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012 Feb;98(1):24-9. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.08.014. Epub 2012 Jan 13.
10
The Harris-Galante porous-coated acetabular component with screw fixation. An average ten-year follow-up study.采用螺钉固定的哈里斯-加兰特多孔涂层髋臼组件。一项平均十年的随访研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Jan;81(1):66-73. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199901000-00010.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of retaining the femoral stem in revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.保留股骨柄在翻修全髋关节置换术中的影响:系统评价、荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Feb;144(2):947-966. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05087-3. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
2
A valuable technique for femoral stem revision in total hip replacement: The in-cement revision - A case series and technical note.全髋关节置换术中股骨柄翻修的一项重要技术:骨水泥内翻修——病例系列及技术说明
J Orthop. 2016 Jul 1;13(4):294-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2016.06.023. eCollection 2016 Dec.
3
Effect of removal and reinsertion of force-closed stems on deformation of total hip arthroplasty.
强制封闭型柄取出与重新植入对全髋关节置换术变形的影响。
Rev Bras Ortop. 2016 Jan 21;51(1):29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2015.03.016. eCollection 2016 Jan-Feb.
4
Isolated acetabular revision after total hip arthroplasty: results at 5-9 years of follow-up.全髋关节置换术后孤立性髋臼翻修:5至9年随访结果
Int Orthop. 2005 Oct;29(5):277-80. doi: 10.1007/s00264-005-0674-2. Epub 2005 Aug 11.