Butters E, Higginson I
Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene, UK.
AIDS Care. 1995;7(5):593-603. doi: 10.1080/09540129550126245.
Following the debate over the role and funding of specialist HIV/AIDS services there has been a call for more information about the needs of people with advanced HIV/AIDS and the processes and outcomes of care. This study describes the characteristics and problems of patients referred to two HIV/AIDS community teams in central London: Home Support Team (HST) and Community Care Team (CCT). Data was collected prospectively for consecutive referrals. A validated outcome measure of palliative care assessed 17 items (e.g. symptoms and anxieties), each rated 0 (best = no problem) to 4 (worst = severe problems). In total 234 patients (HST 116, CCT 118) were referred. Of these 215 died in care (HST 109, CCT 106). Most (232) were male (197 homosexual), mean age 37.8 years and 199 had AIDS at referral. Main sources of referral to HST were hospital ward rounds or nurses (51%); and to CCT genito-urinary medicine clinic staff (59%). Patients were referred to CCT much later in the course of their disease and spent a significantly shorter time in care (median time: HST 42 weeks, CCT 9.5 weeks). Symptom control, family anxiety and patient anxiety were identified as severe problems for 11%-58% of patients in the care of both teams. During the last 6 weeks of life HST patients' ratings for symptom control and family anxiety became more severe compared with CCT, where patients' ratings for four items improved. These findings suggest that staff referring patients may need further training in the recognition and management of the needs of patients and their carers and families. The similarity of problems between these patients and those reported for cancer patients suggests that the transfer of principles of good practice between services caring for these patient groups would be beneficial.
在围绕艾滋病专科服务的作用和资金投入展开辩论之后,人们呼吁获取更多关于晚期艾滋病患者的需求以及护理过程和结果的信息。本研究描述了转介至伦敦市中心两个艾滋病社区团队的患者的特征和问题:家庭支持团队(HST)和社区护理团队(CCT)。对连续转介的患者进行了前瞻性数据收集。一项经过验证的姑息治疗结果测量指标评估了17个项目(如症状和焦虑),每个项目的评分从0(最佳 = 无问题)到4(最差 = 严重问题)。总共转介了234名患者(HST为116名,CCT为118名)。其中215名在护理期间死亡(HST为109名,CCT为106名)。大多数患者(232名)为男性(197名同性恋者),平均年龄37.8岁,199名患者在转介时已患有艾滋病。转介至HST的主要来源是医院查房或护士(51%);转介至CCT的主要来源是泌尿生殖医学诊所工作人员(59%)。患者在病程后期才被转介至CCT,且在护理期间花费的时间明显更短(中位时间:HST为42周,CCT为9.5周)。在两个团队的护理中,11% - 58%的患者存在症状控制、家庭焦虑和患者焦虑等严重问题。在生命的最后6周,与CCT相比,HST患者在症状控制和家庭焦虑方面的评分变得更严重,而CCT患者在四个项目上的评分有所改善。这些发现表明,转介患者的工作人员可能需要在识别和管理患者及其护理人员和家庭的需求方面接受进一步培训。这些患者与癌症患者报告的问题具有相似性,这表明在为这些患者群体提供护理的服务之间转移良好实践原则将是有益的。