Suppr超能文献

精确重复和概念重复区分概念记忆测试:对迁移适当加工理论的挑战

Exact and conceptual repetition dissociate conceptual memory tests: problems for transfer appropriate processing theory.

作者信息

McDermott K B, Roediger H L

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005-1892, USA.

出版信息

Can J Exp Psychol. 1996 Mar;50(1):57-71. doi: 10.1037/1196-1961.50.1.57.

Abstract

Three experiments examined whether a conceptual implicit memory test (specifically, category instance generation) would exhibit repetition effects similar to those found in free recall. The transfer appropriate processing account of dissociations among memory tests led us to predict that the tests would show parallel effects; this prediction was based upon the theory's assumption that conceptual tests will behave similarly as a function of various independent variables. In Experiment 1, conceptual repetition (i.e., following a target word [e.g., puzzles] with an associate [e.g., jigsaw]) did not enhance priming on the instance generation test relative to the condition of simply presenting the target word once, although this manipulation did affect free recall. In Experiment 2, conceptual repetition was achieved by following a picture with its corresponding word (or vice versa). In this case, there was an effect of conceptual repetition on free recall but no reliable effect on category instance generation or category cued recall. In addition, we obtained a picture superiority effect in free recall but not in category instance generation. In the third experiment, when the same study sequence was used as in Experiment 1, but with instructions that encouraged relational processing, priming on the category instance generation task was enhanced by conceptual repetition. Results demonstrate that conceptual memory tests can be dissociated and present problems for Roediger's (1990) transfer appropriate processing account of dissociations between explicit and implicit tests.

摘要

三项实验探究了概念性内隐记忆测试(具体而言,类别实例生成)是否会表现出与自由回忆中发现的类似的重复效应。记忆测试间分离的迁移适当加工理论使我们预测这些测试会呈现出平行效应;这一预测基于该理论的假设,即概念性测试作为各种自变量的函数,其表现会相似。在实验1中,概念性重复(即,在一个目标词[如,拼图]之后呈现一个关联词[如,七巧板])相对于仅呈现一次目标词的条件,并未增强实例生成测试中的启动效应,尽管这种操作确实影响了自由回忆。在实验2中,通过在一幅图片之后呈现其对应的单词(或反之亦然)来实现概念性重复。在这种情况下,概念性重复对自由回忆有影响,但对类别实例生成或类别线索回忆没有可靠的影响。此外,我们在自由回忆中获得了图片优势效应,但在类别实例生成中没有。在第三个实验中,当使用与实验1相同的学习序列,但带有鼓励关系加工的指导语时,概念性重复增强了类别实例生成任务中的启动效应。结果表明,概念性记忆测试可以被分离,并且给罗迪格(1990)关于显性和隐性测试之间分离的迁移适当加工理论带来了问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验