Mulligan N W, Guyer P S, Beland A
Department of Psychology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75275-0442, USA.
Mem Cognit. 1999 Jul;27(4):633-47. doi: 10.3758/bf03211557.
The distinction between item-specific and relational information (Hunt & Einstein, 1981) may be relevant to accounts of conceptual priming in the category exemplar production task. In three experiments, the implications of this hypothesis were tested by examining the effects of organization and levels-of-processing (LOP) on this implicit test. Consistent with the hypothesis, the effects of LOP were greater when study lists were organized by category than when they were presented randomly. Furthermore, when subjects claiming test awareness or intentional retrieval were excluded from the analysis, the LOP effect was reduced (and, in fact, eliminated) in the random list condition but remained robust in the categorized condition. Finally, the experimental design of the LOP manipulation (i.e., mixed-list within, blocked-list within, or between subjects) did not moderate the effects of LOP on this priming task.
特定项目信息与关系信息之间的区别(亨特和爱因斯坦,1981)可能与类别样例生成任务中的概念启动解释相关。在三个实验中,通过考察组织和加工水平(LOP)对这个内隐测试的影响来检验这一假设的含义。与该假设一致,当学习列表按类别组织时,加工水平的影响比随机呈现时更大。此外,当将声称有测试意识或有意检索的受试者排除在分析之外时,在随机列表条件下加工水平效应减小(实际上消除了),但在分类条件下仍然显著。最后,加工水平操纵的实验设计(即被试内混合列表、被试内区组列表或被试间)并未调节加工水平对这个启动任务的影响。