Kallio P
Institute of Dentistry, University of Helsinki, Finland.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1996 Apr;24(2):128-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1996.tb00829.x.
The purpose of this descriptive, cross-sectional community-based investigation was to assess the self-assessment of bleeding and plaque as methods to monitor gingival health among adolescents. Two study groups (n = 184 each) of 14-year-old Finnish school children performed either of self-assessment plaque or bleeding. Prior to that they were clinically examined by 10 dentists from the community dental service who recorded bleeding on probing from four surfaces of all teeth (BOP%) and Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Needs (CPITN) status. The self-assessment of plaque was not significantly correlated with a clinical bleeding on probing measurement (BOP%). The self-assessment of bleeding, based on observed bleeding after toothbrushing and after interproximal cleaning with toothpicks, exhibited statistically significant correlation with BOP% (r = 0.54, P < 0.001). Percent agreement was 75%, kappa agreement 0.33, sensitivity 31% and specificity 71%, respectively. In conclusion, the preliminary results suggest that the self-assessment of bleeding does not have sufficient validity for screening individuals but it could be a useful method for monitoring gingival health of populations, in particular, if the concurrent aim is to enhance periodontal awareness.
这项基于社区的描述性横断面调查的目的是评估青少年将自我评估出血和菌斑作为监测牙龈健康方法的情况。两组各有184名14岁芬兰学童的研究小组分别进行了自我评估菌斑或出血情况。在此之前,来自社区牙科服务机构的10名牙医对他们进行了临床检查,记录了所有牙齿四个表面的探诊出血情况(BOP%)以及社区牙周治疗需求指数(CPITN)状况。菌斑的自我评估与临床探诊出血测量值(BOP%)无显著相关性。基于刷牙后和用牙签进行邻面清洁后观察到的出血情况进行的出血自我评估,与BOP%表现出统计学上的显著相关性(r = 0.54,P < 0.001)。一致性百分比分别为75%,kappa一致性为0.33,敏感性为31%,特异性为71%。总之,初步结果表明,出血自我评估对个体筛查的有效性不足,但其可能是监测人群牙龈健康的一种有用方法,特别是如果同时旨在提高牙周健康意识。