van Rijkom H M, Truin G J, van 't Hof M A
Department of Cariology and Endodontology, TRIKON: Institute for Dental Clinical Research, Faculty of Medical Science, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J Dent Res. 1996 Feb;75(2):790-5. doi: 10.1177/00220345960750020901.
A meta-analysis was performed on published data on the caries-inhibiting effect of chlorhexidine treatment. The results of the various studies are difficult to evaluate because of various treatment procedures, dissimilar features of participants, and different presentations of study results. A meta-analysis provides a more structured approach than the traditional review, due to systematic analysis and numerical processing of the available information. The objectives of this meta-analysis were: (1) to assess a more accurate estimate of the caries-inhibiting effect of chlorhexidine treatment than provided by individual studies, and (2) to explore factors potentially modifying the effect of chlorhexidine treatment in caries prevention, i.e., the application method, application frequency, target population, the fluoride regime, and caries criteria. Caries reduction was expressed by the prevented fraction, indicating the percentage reduction of caries incidence in the chlorhexidine group. For all prevented fractions, 95% confidence intervals were calculated. The overall caries-inhibiting effect of the chlorhexidine treatment studies was 46% (95% CI = 35% - 57%). Multiple-regression analysis showed no significant influence on the prevented fractions for the variables "application method", "application frequency", "caries risk", "fluoride regime", "caries diagnosis", and "tooth surface".
对已发表的关于洗必泰治疗防龋效果的数据进行了荟萃分析。由于各种治疗程序、参与者的不同特征以及研究结果的不同呈现方式,各项研究的结果难以评估。荟萃分析通过对现有信息进行系统分析和数值处理,提供了一种比传统综述更具结构化的方法。本荟萃分析的目的是:(1)评估比个体研究更准确的洗必泰治疗防龋效果估计值,(2)探索可能改变洗必泰治疗在预防龋齿中效果的因素,即应用方法、应用频率、目标人群、氟化物使用情况和龋齿标准。龋病减少用预防分数表示,即洗必泰组龋齿发病率降低的百分比。对所有预防分数计算了95%置信区间。洗必泰治疗研究的总体防龋效果为46%(95%CI = 35% - 57%)。多元回归分析表明,“应用方法”、“应用频率”、“龋病风险”、“氟化物使用情况”、“龋病诊断”和“牙面”等变量对预防分数没有显著影响。