Department of Public Health Dentistry, JSS Dental College & Hospital (Constituent College), JSS Academy of Higher Education & Research, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.
J Prev Med Hyg. 2022 Jul 31;63(2):E282-E287. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2022.63.2.1772. eCollection 2022 Jun.
Chlorhexidine is considered the most potent chemotherapeutic agent against Streptococcus mutans. However, its side effects due to prolonged use, indicates need for alternatives. The study intended to assess and compare antimicrobial efficacies of probiotic, xylitol and chlorhexidine mouth rinses in children and elderly.
The study was a Double blind Randomized Controlled Trial conducted among residential school children aged 5-12 years and elderly greater than 60 years residing in old age homes. (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04399161). 30 participants each among children and elderly were chosen based on eligibility criterion (high risk for caries). They were further randomly divided into 3 groups with 10 participants in each group. Participants were asked to rinse with 15 ml of freshly prepared mouth rinses once daily for 2 minutes for 14 days. Antimicrobial efficacy was determined by assessing change in Streptococcus mutans levels in dental plaque.
Significant reduction in Streptococcus mutans counts were observed in both children and elderly (Chlorhexidine: mean difference = 3.11 log10CFU/g, p = 0.022, Xylitol: mean difference = 0.93 log10CFU/g, p = 0.046, Probiotic: mean difference = 1.91 log10CFU/g, p = 0.023 in children); (Chlorhexidine: mean difference = 2.23 log10CFU/g, p = 0.004, Xylitol: mean difference = 1.39 log10CFU/g, p = 0.009, Probiotic: mean difference = 1.61 log10CFU/g, p = 0.018 in elderly). Intergroup comparison showed no significant difference.
Antimicrobial efficacy of xylitol and probiotic mouth rinses were comparable to that of chlorhexidine in both children and elderly. Probiotics could potentially be more efficacious than xylitol among children.
洗必泰被认为是抗变形链球菌最有效的化学治疗剂。然而,由于其长期使用的副作用,需要寻找替代品。本研究旨在评估和比较益生菌、木糖醇和洗必泰漱口液在儿童和老年人中的抗菌效果。
这是一项在寄宿制学校的 5-12 岁儿童和养老院中年龄大于 60 岁的老年人中进行的双盲随机对照试验。(临床试验.gov 注册号:NCT04399161)。根据入选标准(龋齿高风险),在儿童和老年人中各选择 30 名参与者。然后,他们进一步随机分为 3 组,每组 10 名参与者。参与者被要求每天用 15 毫升新制备的漱口液漱口 1 次,持续 2 分钟,共 14 天。抗菌效果通过评估牙菌斑中变形链球菌水平的变化来确定。
儿童和老年人的变形链球菌计数均显著减少(洗必泰:平均差异=3.11 log10CFU/g,p=0.022,木糖醇:平均差异=0.93 log10CFU/g,p=0.046,益生菌:平均差异=1.91 log10CFU/g,p=0.023);(洗必泰:平均差异=2.23 log10CFU/g,p=0.004,木糖醇:平均差异=1.39 log10CFU/g,p=0.009,益生菌:平均差异=1.61 log10CFU/g,p=0.018)。组间比较无显著性差异。
木糖醇和益生菌漱口液在儿童和老年人中的抗菌效果与洗必泰相当。益生菌在儿童中的效果可能优于木糖醇。