Voss A, Kurths J, Kleiner H J, Witt A, Wessel N
MDC Max-Delbrueck-Centrum fuer Molekulare Medizin, Franz-Volhard-Klinik, Berlin, Germany.
J Electrocardiol. 1995;28 Suppl:81-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-0736(95)80021-2.
The traditional analysis of heart rate variability (HRV) in the time and frequency domains seems to be an independent predictive marker for sudden cardiac death. Because the usual applied methods of HRV analysis describe only linear or strong periodic phenomena, the authors have developed new methods of HRV analysis based on nonlinear dynamics. In that way, parameters are extracted that quantify more complex processes and their complicated relationships. These methods are symbolic dynamics that describes the beat-to-beat dynamics and renormalized entropy that compares the complexity of power spectra on a normalized energy level. In an initial investigation, the HRV of 35 healthy subjects and 39 cardiac patients have been analyzed. Using discriminant functions, the authors found an optimal (100%) differentiation between the group of healthy subjects (even using only an age-matched subgroup of 12 subjects) and that of patients after myocardial infarction with a high electrical risk (Lown 4b). Applying this discriminant function to a group of patients with low electrical risk, four patients show the same behavior indicative of a high risk score, which might be a sign for a hidden high risk, two patients show healthy behavior, and the remaining patients show a separate pattern. The use of new methods of nonlinear dynamics in combination with parameters of the time and frequency domains in HRV offers possibilities for improved classification of HRV behavior. It is suggested that this could lead to a more detailed classification of individual high risk.
传统的心率变异性(HRV)时域和频域分析似乎是心脏性猝死的一个独立预测指标。由于通常应用的HRV分析方法仅描述线性或强周期性现象,作者基于非线性动力学开发了新的HRV分析方法。通过这种方式,提取了量化更复杂过程及其复杂关系的参数。这些方法包括描述逐搏动态的符号动力学和在归一化能量水平上比较功率谱复杂性的重归一化熵。在初步研究中,对35名健康受试者和39名心脏病患者的HRV进行了分析。通过判别函数,作者发现健康受试者组(甚至仅使用12名年龄匹配的亚组受试者)与心肌梗死后具有高电风险(Lown 4b)的患者组之间有最佳(100%)区分。将此判别函数应用于一组低电风险患者,4名患者表现出相同的高风险评分行为,这可能是隐藏高风险的迹象,2名患者表现出健康行为,其余患者表现出不同的模式。在HRV中使用非线性动力学新方法结合时域和频域参数为改善HRV行为分类提供了可能性。有人认为,这可能导致对个体高风险进行更详细的分类。