• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单语和双语儿童及成人阅读过程中语言内和跨语言激活的眼动测量:聚焦邻域密度效应

Eye Movement Measures of Within-Language and Cross-Language Activation During Reading in Monolingual and Bilingual Children and Adults: A Focus on Neighborhood Density Effects.

作者信息

Whitford Veronica, Joanisse Marc F

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada.

Department of Psychology, Brain and Mind Institute, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 27;12:674007. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.674007. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.674007
PMID:34777083
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8578698/
Abstract

We used eye movement measures of first-language (L1) and second-language (L2) paragraph reading to investigate how the activation of multiple lexical candidates, both within and across languages, influences visual word recognition in four different age and language groups: (1) monolingual children; (2) monolingual young adults; (3) bilingual children; and (4) bilingual young adults. More specifically, we focused on within-language and cross-language orthographic neighborhood density effects, while controlling for the potentially confounding effects of orthographic neighborhood frequency. We found facilitatory within-language orthographic neighborhood density effects (i.e., words were easier to process when they had many vs. few orthographic neighbors, evidenced by shorter fixation durations) across the L1 and L2, with larger effects in children vs. adults (especially the bilingual ones) during L1 reading. Similarly, we found facilitatory cross-language neighborhood density effects across the L1 and L2, with no modulatory influence of age or language group. Taken together, our findings suggest that word recognition benefits from the simultaneous activation of visually similar word forms during naturalistic reading, with some evidence of larger effects in children and particularly those whose words may have differentially lower baseline activation levels and/or weaker links between word-related information due to divided language exposure: bilinguals.

摘要

我们使用第一语言(L1)和第二语言(L2)段落阅读的眼动测量方法,来研究多种词汇候选词在语言内部和跨语言的激活,如何影响四个不同年龄和语言组的视觉单词识别:(1)单语儿童;(2)单语青年;(3)双语儿童;(4)双语青年。更具体地说,我们关注语言内部和跨语言的正字法邻域密度效应,同时控制正字法邻域频率的潜在混杂效应。我们发现,在L1和L2中,语言内部正字法邻域密度效应具有促进作用(即,当单词有许多正字法邻居而不是很少时,处理起来更容易,这通过更短的注视持续时间得以证明),在L1阅读过程中,儿童比成人(尤其是双语者)的效应更大。同样,我们发现L1和L2之间存在促进性的跨语言邻域密度效应,年龄或语言组没有调节作用。综合来看,我们的研究结果表明,在自然阅读过程中,单词识别受益于视觉上相似单词形式的同时激活,有证据表明儿童,尤其是那些由于语言接触分散,单词可能具有较低基线激活水平和/或单词相关信息之间联系较弱的儿童(双语者),其效应更大。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdb3/8578698/e56329889dcf/fpsyg-12-674007-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdb3/8578698/e56329889dcf/fpsyg-12-674007-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdb3/8578698/e56329889dcf/fpsyg-12-674007-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Eye Movement Measures of Within-Language and Cross-Language Activation During Reading in Monolingual and Bilingual Children and Adults: A Focus on Neighborhood Density Effects.单语和双语儿童及成人阅读过程中语言内和跨语言激活的眼动测量:聚焦邻域密度效应
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 27;12:674007. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.674007. eCollection 2021.
2
Do eye movements reveal differences between monolingual and bilingual children's first-language and second-language reading? A focus on word frequency effects.眼球运动能否揭示单语和双语儿童第一语言和第二语言阅读之间的差异?对词频效应的关注。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Sep;173:318-337. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 May 23.
3
Second-language experience modulates first- and second-language word frequency effects: evidence from eye movement measures of natural paragraph reading.第二语言经验调节第一语言和第二语言词频效应:来自自然段落阅读眼动测量的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Feb;19(1):73-80. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0179-5.
4
Event-related Potential Measures of Visual Word Processing in Monolingual and Bilingual Children and Adults: A Focus on Word Frequency Effects.事件相关电位测量法在单语和双语儿童及成人的视觉词汇处理中的应用:以词频效应为重点。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Jun 1;36(7):1493-1522. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02190.
5
Disentangling cross-language orthographic neighborhood from markedness effects in L2 visual word recognition.在第二语言视觉词汇识别中,从标记效应中分离出跨语言的正字法邻近性。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Feb;26(1):353-359. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1518-6.
6
Frequency effects in monolingual and bilingual natural reading.单语和双语自然阅读中的频率效应
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Oct;22(5):1216-34. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0819-2.
7
Eye Movement Patterns in Natural Reading: A Comparison of Monolingual and Bilingual Reading of a Novel.自然阅读中的眼动模式:小说单语阅读与双语阅读的比较
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 19;10(8):e0134008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134008. eCollection 2015.
8
The effects of word frequency and word predictability during first- and second-language paragraph reading in bilingual older and younger adults.双语老年人和年轻人在第一语言和第二语言段落阅读过程中单词频率和单词可预测性的影响。
Psychol Aging. 2017 Mar;32(2):158-177. doi: 10.1037/pag0000151.
9
Activation Patterns throughout the Word Processing Network of L1-dominant Bilinguals Reflect Language Similarity and Language Decisions.母语占主导地位的双语者在整个文字处理网络中的激活模式反映了语言相似性和语言决策。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Nov;27(11):2197-214. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00853. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
10
The Impact of Language Opacity and Proficiency on Reading Strategies in Bilinguals: An Eye Movement Study.语言晦涩性和熟练程度对双语者阅读策略的影响:一项眼动研究
Front Psychol. 2016 May 6;7:649. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00649. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of phonological and orthographic similarity on L2 word recognition across modalities in bilinguals.语音和正字法相似性对双语者跨模态二语单词识别的抑制和促进作用。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 17;11(1):12812. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92259-z.
2
Changes in the Sensitivity to Language-Specific Orthographic Patterns With Age.对特定语言拼写模式的敏感度随年龄的变化。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 14;11:1691. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01691. eCollection 2020.
3
Cognate facilitation in Frisian-Dutch bilingual children's sentence reading: An eye-tracking study.
弗里西-荷兰双语儿童句子阅读中的同源词促进作用:一项眼动研究。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Jan;189:104699. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104699. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
4
Revisiting the Neighborhood: How L2 Proficiency and Neighborhood Manipulation Affect Bilingual Processing.重访邻域:二语熟练度与邻域操作如何影响双语加工
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 4;9:1860. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01860. eCollection 2018.
5
Disentangling cross-language orthographic neighborhood from markedness effects in L2 visual word recognition.在第二语言视觉词汇识别中,从标记效应中分离出跨语言的正字法邻近性。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Feb;26(1):353-359. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1518-6.
6
Do eye movements reveal differences between monolingual and bilingual children's first-language and second-language reading? A focus on word frequency effects.眼球运动能否揭示单语和双语儿童第一语言和第二语言阅读之间的差异?对词频效应的关注。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Sep;173:318-337. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 May 23.
7
Cross-language Neighborhood Effects in Learners Indicative of an Integrated Lexicon.学习者的跨语言邻域效应表明词汇具有综合性。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Jan;30(1):70-85. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01184. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
8
Orthographic learning, fast and slow: Lexical competition effects reveal the time course of word learning in developing readers.正字法学习,快与慢:词汇竞争效应揭示了发展中读者单词学习的时间进程。
Cognition. 2017 Jun;163:93-102. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
9
The effects of word frequency and word predictability during first- and second-language paragraph reading in bilingual older and younger adults.双语老年人和年轻人在第一语言和第二语言段落阅读过程中单词频率和单词可预测性的影响。
Psychol Aging. 2017 Mar;32(2):158-177. doi: 10.1037/pag0000151.
10
Cross-lingual neighborhood effects in generalized lexical decision and natural reading.广义词汇判断和自然阅读中的跨语言邻域效应
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Jun;43(6):887-915. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000352. Epub 2017 Jan 16.