Ferris D G, Dekle C, Litaker M S
Medical Effectiveness Education and Research Program, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta 30912, USA.
J Fam Pract. 1996 Jun;42(6):595-600.
Over-the-counter (OTC) antifungal products for vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) have gained tremendous popularity, as evidenced by staggering increases in sales since the products were switched from prescription-only to OTC status. The rapid escalation in the sale of these products may imply that women are using them inappropriately. The purposes of this study were to determine (1) whether women could correctly diagnose VVC and common genitourinary tract problems after reading classic case scenarios, (2) whether women could correctly select the appropriate treatment for these cases, and (3) whether a previous diagnosis of VVC by a clinician had any effect on a woman's ability to self-diagnose and self-treat VVC.
Women 16 years of age and older were recruited from medical and community sites to complete a 63-question survey instrument designed to assess their knowledge of the symptoms and signs of pelvic inflammatory disease, bacterial vaginosis, acute cystitis, vaginal trichomoniasis, and vulvovaginal candidiasis after reading classic case scenarios.
A total of 601 women completed the questionnaire, 552 subjects and 49 medically trained women who served as a criterion standard for comparison. Of the 552 subjects, 365 reported a prior diagnosis of VCC and 154 reported no such prior diagnosis. The medically trained cohort was more accurate in diagnosing VVC (83.7% correct) than were subjects who had received a prior diagnosis of VVC (34.5% correct), and more accurate than subjects without a previous diagnosis of VVC (11.0% correct, P < .001). A greater percentage of subjects in whom VVC had been previously diagnosed, as compared with the medically trained cohort, would use OTC agents inappropriately for pelvic inflammatory disease (6.7% vs 4.3%, respectively; P = NS), bacterial vaginosis (14.6% vs 6.4%, respectively; P = .028), urinary tract infection (2.0% vs 0%, respectively; P < .001), and vaginal trichomoniasis (11.8% vs 6.6%, respectively; P = .048).
A minority of women were able to correctly diagnose VVC from a classic case scenario. A prior clinical diagnosis of VVC had only a moderate positive effect on subjects' ability to correctly diagnose a classic case. Based on our findings, women likely use OTC antifungals inappropriately to treat gynecologic conditions that are similar but potentially more severe. Numerous adverse consequences may result from misdiagnosis. Improved patient education by health care providers and the manufacturers of OTC antifungal drugs might improve this diagnostic problem.
用于外阴阴道念珠菌病(VVC)的非处方(OTC)抗真菌产品广受欢迎,自这些产品从仅需处方改为非处方状态后,销售额惊人增长便是明证。这些产品销售额的迅速攀升可能意味着女性使用不当。本研究的目的是确定:(1)女性在阅读典型病例后能否正确诊断VVC及常见的泌尿生殖道问题;(2)女性能否为这些病例正确选择合适的治疗方法;(3)临床医生先前对VVC的诊断是否会对女性自我诊断和自我治疗VVC的能力产生影响。
从医疗机构和社区招募16岁及以上的女性,让她们完成一份63个问题的调查问卷,该问卷旨在评估她们在阅读典型病例后对盆腔炎、细菌性阴道病、急性膀胱炎、阴道毛滴虫病和外阴阴道念珠菌病的症状和体征的了解情况。
共有601名女性完成了问卷,其中552名受试者和49名接受过医学培训的女性作为比较的标准。在552名受试者中,365名报告曾被诊断为VVC,154名报告未曾有过这种先前诊断。接受过医学培训的人群诊断VVC的准确率(83.7%正确)高于先前被诊断为VVC的受试者(34.5%正确),也高于未曾有过VVC先前诊断的受试者(11.0%正确,P <.001)。与接受过医学培训的人群相比,先前被诊断为VVC的受试者中,有更大比例的人会将非处方药物不恰当地用于治疗盆腔炎(分别为6.7%和4.3%;P = 无显著差异)、细菌性阴道病(分别为14.6%和6.4%;P =.028)、尿路感染(分别为2.0%和0%;P <.001)以及阴道毛滴虫病(分别为11.