• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神病学临床研究中使用的翻译后的知情同意书的可理解性。

Comprehensibility of translated informed consent documents used in clinical research in psychiatry.

作者信息

Jhanwar Venu Gopal, Bishnoi Ram Jeevan

机构信息

Deva Institute of Healthcare and Research (P) Ltd, B27/70MN, Durgakund, Varanasi - 221005, India.

出版信息

Indian J Psychol Med. 2010 Jan;32(1):7-12. doi: 10.4103/0253-7176.70517.

DOI:10.4103/0253-7176.70517
PMID:21799552
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3137819/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Informed consent forms are required in all clinical trials which are approved by an independent Ethics Committee before practical use in the trials. However, how much the average subject actually understands of the information contained in these informed consent forms is uncertain.

AIM

In a cross sectional study, the translated informed consent forms used in psychiatric clinical trials were assessed with respect to their ease of readability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed 30 informed consent forms translated from English to Hindi used in multinational and multicentre psychiatric clinical trials sponsored by different sponsors. We examined consent forms for readability scores and factors that might relate to readability.

RESULTS

The mean readability score for the informed consent forms, determined by the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level Index (FKGL) was grade levels of 13.66. The ease of readability assessed by the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES) was 46.08 suggesting significant complexity of the texts. These values carry even more significance when the average years of schooling for India as a whole are 6.2 years.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that the most informed consent forms were too complex to understand by an average adult subject. We suggest reducing this complexity and increasing the ease of readability so those average subjects receive the intended information as exactly as it could be. This can be achieved by few simple measures like improving the deficiencies in translation processes, encouraging the investigators to participate while preparing these forms, and enhanced understanding of the site specific requirements, namely culture, language (dialect), general literacy rate, etc.

摘要

背景

所有临床试验在实际用于试验之前都需经独立伦理委员会批准,并要有知情同意书。然而,普通受试者对这些知情同意书中所包含信息的实际理解程度尚不确定。

目的

在一项横断面研究中,对精神科临床试验中使用的翻译后的知情同意书的易读性进行评估。

材料与方法

我们分析了30份从英文翻译成印地语的知情同意书,这些知情同意书用于由不同主办方赞助的跨国和多中心精神科临床试验。我们检查了知情同意书的可读性得分以及可能与可读性相关的因素。

结果

根据弗莱什-金凯德年级水平指数(FKGL)确定的知情同意书的平均可读性得分为13.66年级水平。通过弗莱什阅读简易度得分(FRES)评估的易读性为46.08,表明文本具有显著的复杂性。考虑到印度全国的平均受教育年限为6.2年,这些数值更具意义。

结论

我们的结果表明,大多数知情同意书对于普通成年受试者来说过于复杂而难以理解。我们建议降低这种复杂性并提高易读性,以便普通受试者能够准确接收预期的信息。这可以通过一些简单的措施来实现,比如改善翻译过程中的不足,鼓励研究者在准备这些表格时参与其中,以及增强对特定地点要求的理解,即文化、语言(方言)、总体识字率等。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d7d/3137819/596b1a66c0fd/IJPsyM-32-7-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d7d/3137819/e20bdc7649e6/IJPsyM-32-7-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d7d/3137819/596b1a66c0fd/IJPsyM-32-7-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d7d/3137819/e20bdc7649e6/IJPsyM-32-7-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d7d/3137819/596b1a66c0fd/IJPsyM-32-7-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Comprehensibility of translated informed consent documents used in clinical research in psychiatry.精神病学临床研究中使用的翻译后的知情同意书的可理解性。
Indian J Psychol Med. 2010 Jan;32(1):7-12. doi: 10.4103/0253-7176.70517.
2
The readability of informed consent forms for research studies conducted in South Africa.南非开展的研究性医学临床试验知情同意书的可读性。
S Afr Med J. 2021 Feb 1;111(2):180-183. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2021.v111i2.14752.
3
Readability of informed consent forms in clinical trials conducted in a skin research center.皮肤研究中心开展的临床试验中知情同意书的可读性
J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2016 Jul 3;9:7. eCollection 2016.
4
Assessment of Length and Readability of Informed Consent Documents for COVID-19 Vaccine Trials.新型冠状病毒肺炎疫苗试验知情同意书的长度与可读性评估
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e2110843. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10843.
5
Readability of consent forms in veterinary clinical research.兽医临床研究中知情同意书的可读性
J Vet Intern Med. 2019 Mar;33(2):350-355. doi: 10.1111/jvim.15462. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
6
Informed consent forms for clinical and research imaging procedures: how much do patients understand?临床和研究成像程序的知情同意书:患者理解多少?
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Feb;164(2):493-6. doi: 10.2214/ajr.164.2.7839996.
7
Assessing the Readability of Clinical Trial Consent Forms for Surgical Specialties.评估外科专业临床试验知情同意书的可读性。
J Surg Res. 2024 Apr;296:711-719. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.01.045. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
8
Do informed consent documents for chiropractic clinical research studies meet readability level recommendations and contain required elements: a descriptive study.脊椎按摩疗法临床研究的知情同意文件是否符合可读性水平建议并包含所需要素:一项描述性研究。
Chiropr Man Therap. 2014 Dec 10;22(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12998-014-0040-9. eCollection 2014.
9
Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability.知情同意书的可读性标准与实际可读性对比
N Engl J Med. 2003 Feb 20;348(8):721-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa021212.
10
Regulatory compliance and readability of informed consent forms in industry-sponsored drug development clinical trials.行业资助药物开发临床试验中知情同意书的监管合规性和可读性。
Clin Trials. 2023 Oct;20(5):517-527. doi: 10.1177/17407745231174528. Epub 2023 May 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Readability of health research informed consent forms: case of the National Health Research Ethics Committee in Tanzania.健康研究知情同意书的可读性:以坦桑尼亚国家卫生研究伦理委员会为例。
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Apr 22;26(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01200-w.
2
What empirical research has been undertaken on the ethics of clinical research in India? A systematic scoping review and narrative synthesis.在印度,临床研究伦理方面开展了哪些实证研究?系统范围界定审查和叙述性综合。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 May;6(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004729.
3
Informed consent in psychiatry outpatients.

本文引用的文献

1
The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research.《贝尔蒙报告》。保护人类研究受试者的伦理原则与准则。
J Am Coll Dent. 2014 Summer;81(3):4-13.
2
Competence of mentally ill patients: a comparative empirical study.精神病患者的行为能力:一项比较实证研究。
Psychol Med. 2003 Nov;33(8):1463-71. doi: 10.1017/s0033291703008389.
3
Diabetes websites accredited by the Health On the Net Foundation Code of Conduct: readable or not?经健康上网基金会行为准则认证的糖尿病网站:是否易于阅读?
精神病学门诊中的知情同意。
Indian J Med Res. 2020 Jan;151(1):35-41. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1036_18.
4
Developing informed consent materials for non-English-speaking participants: An analysis of four professional firm translations from English to Spanish.为非英语母语参与者制定知情同意书材料:对四家专业公司将英语译为西班牙语的译文分析。
Clin Trials. 2018 Dec;15(6):557-566. doi: 10.1177/1740774518801591. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
5
The readability of editorials in popular Indian medical journals.印度大众医学期刊社论的可读性。
Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Oct;17(Suppl 1):S363-6. doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.119626.
6
Lost in translation: assessing effectiveness of focus group questioning techniques to develop improved translation of terminology used in HIV prevention clinical trials.迷失在翻译中:评估焦点小组提问技术在提高 HIV 预防临床试验中使用的术语翻译效果的研究。
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 10;8(9):e73799. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073799. eCollection 2013.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2003;95:655-60.
4
The decision dynamics of clinical research: the context and process of informed consent.临床研究的决策动态:知情同意的背景与过程
Med Care. 2002 Sep;40(9 Suppl):V45-54. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000023955.04138.AF.
5
Health literacy: a review.健康素养:综述
Pharmacotherapy. 2002 Mar;22(3):282-302. doi: 10.1592/phco.22.5.282.33191.
6
The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study. III: Abilities of patients to consent to psychiatric and medical treatments.麦克阿瑟治疗能力研究。第三部分:患者同意接受精神科和医学治疗的能力。
Law Hum Behav. 1995 Apr;19(2):149-74. doi: 10.1007/BF01499323.
7
Informed consent documents: increasing comprehension by reducing reading level.知情同意文件:通过降低阅读难度来提高理解度。
IRB. 1990 May-Jun;12(3):1-5.
8
A systematic review of patient information leaflets for hypertension.高血压患者信息手册的系统评价。
J Hum Hypertens. 2000 Apr;14(4):259-62. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001003.
9
Competence of depressed patients for consent to research.抑郁症患者的研究同意能力。
Am J Psychiatry. 1999 Sep;156(9):1380-4. doi: 10.1176/ajp.156.9.1380.
10
Informed consent for clinical trials: a comparative study of standard versus simplified forms.临床试验的知情同意书:标准形式与简化形式的比较研究
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998 May 6;90(9):668-74. doi: 10.1093/jnci/90.9.668.