Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer, ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford, UK.
Lancet. 1996 Jun 22;347(9017):1713-27. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90806-5.
BACKGROUND The Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer has brought together and reanalysed the worldwide epidemiological evidence on the relation between breast cancer risk and use of hormonal contraceptives. METHODS Individual data on 53 297 women with breast cancer and 100 239 women without breast cancer from 54 studies conducted in 25 countries were collected, checked, and analysed centrally. Estimates of the relative risk for breast cancer were obtained by a modification of the Mantel-Haenszel method. All analyses were stratified by study, age at diagnosis, parity, and, where appropriate, the age a woman was when her first child was born, and the age she was when her risk of conception ceased. FINDINGS The results provide strong evidence for two main conclusions. First, while women are taking combined oral contraceptives and in the 10 years after stopping there is a small increase in the relative risk of having breast cancer diagnosed (relative risk [95 percent CI] in current users 1.24 [1.15-1.33], 2p<0.00001; 1-4 years after stopping 1.16 [1.08-1.23], 2p=0.00001; 5-9 years after stopping 1.07 [1.02-1.13], 2p=0.009). Second, there is no significant excess risk of having breast cancer diagnosed 10 or more years after stopping use (relative risk 1.01 [0.96-1.05], NS). The cancers diagnosed in women who had used combined oral contraceptives were less advanced clinically than those diagnosed in women who had never used these contraceptives for ever-users compared with never-users, the relative risk for tumours that had spread beyond the breast compared with localised tumours was 0.88 (0.81-0.95; 2p=0.002). There was no pronounced variation in the results for recency of use between women with different background risks of breast cancer, including women from different countries and ethnic groups, women with different reproductive histories, and those with or without a family history of breast cancer. The studies included in this collaboration represent about 90 percent of the epidemiological information on the topic, and what is known about the other studies suggests that their omission has not materially affected the main conclusions. Other features of hormonal contraceptive use such as duration of use, age at first use, and the dose and type of hormone within the contraceptives had little additional effect on breast cancer risk, once recency of use had been taken into account. Women who began use before age 20 had higher relative risks of having breast cancer diagnosed while they were using combined oral contraceptives and in the 5 years after stopping than women who began use at older ages, but the higher relative risks apply at ages when breast cancer is rare and, for a given duration of use, earlier use does not result in more cancers being diagnosed than use beginning at older ages. Because breast cancer incidence rises steeply with age, the estimated excess number of cancers diagnosed in the period between starting use and 10 years after stopping increases with age at last use: for example, among 10 000 women from Europe or North America who used oral contraceptives from age 16 to 19, from age 20 to 24, and from age 25 to 29, respectively, the estimated excess number of cancers diagnosed up to 10 years after stopping use is 0.5 (95 percent CI 0.3-0.7), 1.5 (0.7-2.3), and 4.7 (2.7-6.7). Up to 20 years after cessation of use the difference between ever-users and never-users is not so much in the total number of cancers diagnosed, but in their clinical presentation, with the breast cancers diagnosed in ever-users being less advanced clinically than those diagnosed in never-users. The relation observed between breast cancer risk and hormone exposure is unusual, and it is not possible to infer from these data whether it is due to an earlier diagnosis of breast cancer in ever-users, the biological effects of hormonal contraceptives, or a combination of reasons...
背景 乳腺癌激素因素协作组汇总并重新分析了全球范围内关于乳腺癌风险与激素避孕药使用之间关系的流行病学证据。
方法 收集、核对并集中分析了来自25个国家开展的54项研究中53297例乳腺癌女性和100239例非乳腺癌女性的个体数据。通过改良的Mantel-Haenszel方法获得乳腺癌相对风险的估计值。所有分析均按研究、诊断时年龄、产次进行分层,酌情按首次生育时年龄以及受孕风险停止时年龄进行分层。
结果 结果为两个主要结论提供了有力证据。第一,女性服用复方口服避孕药期间及停药后10年内,乳腺癌诊断相对风险有小幅增加(当前使用者的相对风险[95%CI]为1.24[1.15 - 1.33],P<0.00001;停药后1 - 4年为1.16[1.08 - 1.23],P = 0.00001;停药后5 - 9年为1.07[1.02 - 1.13],P = 0.009)。第二,停药10年或更长时间后,乳腺癌诊断无显著额外风险(相对风险1.01[0.96 - 1.05],无统计学意义)。与从未使用过这些避孕药的女性相比,使用过复方口服避孕药的女性所诊断出的癌症临床分期较轻:对于长期使用者与从未使用者,肿瘤已扩散至乳腺以外的相对风险与局限性肿瘤相比为0.88(0.81 - 0.95;P = 0.002)。在不同乳腺癌背景风险的女性中,包括来自不同国家和种族群体的女性、具有不同生殖史的女性以及有或无乳腺癌家族史的女性,使用近期情况的结果没有明显差异。本次协作纳入的研究约占该主题流行病学信息的90%,关于其他研究的已知情况表明,遗漏这些研究并未对主要结论产生实质性影响。一旦考虑了使用近期情况,激素避孕药使用的其他特征,如使用持续时间、首次使用年龄以及避孕药内激素的剂量和类型,对乳腺癌风险几乎没有额外影响。20岁之前开始使用的女性在服用复方口服避孕药期间及停药后5年内乳腺癌诊断相对风险高于年龄较大时开始使用的女性,但较高的相对风险出现在乳腺癌罕见的年龄段,并且对于给定的使用持续时间,较早使用并不会比年龄较大时开始使用导致更多的癌症被诊断出来。由于乳腺癌发病率随年龄急剧上升,开始使用至停药后10年期间估计诊断出的额外癌症数量随末次使用年龄增加而增加:例如,在分别从16至19岁、20至24岁以及25至29岁使用口服避孕药的10000名欧洲或北美女性中,停药后10年内估计诊断出的额外癌症数量分别为0.5(95%CI 0.3 - 0.7)、1.5(0.7 - 2.3)和4.7(2.7 - 6.7)。停药后长达20年,曾经使用者与从未使用者之间的差异不在于诊断出的癌症总数,而在于其临床表现,曾经使用者诊断出的乳腺癌临床分期比从未使用者诊断出的乳腺癌更轻。观察到的乳腺癌风险与激素暴露之间的关系并不寻常,从这些数据无法推断这是由于曾经使用者乳腺癌诊断更早、激素避孕药的生物学效应还是多种原因共同作用……