• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孕34周后胎膜早破的处理——早期与延迟引产

Management of premature rupture of the membranes after 34 weeks' gestation -- early versus delayed induction of labour.

作者信息

van Heerden J, Steyn D W

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tygerberg Hospital, W. Cape.

出版信息

S Afr Med J. 1996 Mar;86(3):264-8.

PMID:8658299
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the optimal way to manage patients with premature rupture membranes after 34 weeks' gestation.

DESIGN

A prospective, randomised controlled trial comparing immediate induction and delayed induction after 24 - 48 hours.

SETTING

Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town.

PARTICIPANTS

Seventy consecutive patients with premature rupture of the membranes who presented at Tygerberg Hospital between July and October 1991.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The two groups were compared with regard to infectious morbidity and antibiotic requirement in the mothers and babies, days spent in hospital, caesarean section rates, duration of labour and analgesic requirements.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the two groups in terms of infectious morbidity in either the mothers or the babies, the duration of labour or the caesarean section rates. Nine patients (26%) in the delayed induction group required analgesic treatment during labour versus 18 patients (52%) in the group that was induced immediately (P = 0.049; odds ratio = 0.327; 95% confidence limits = 0.014 - 0.0998). In the delayed induction group, 74% of the patients went into spontaneous labour during the conservative management period. Patients in the active group (immediate induction) had a statistically significant better chance of being discharged within 48 hours of admission (P = 0.028; odds ratio = 3.34; 95% confidence limits = 1.12 -10.73).

CONCLUSIONS

The management of patients with premature rupture of the membranes afer 34 weeks should be decided upon according to the level of antepartum and neonatal care which is available at the particular unit. Where there is adequate neonatal support and pressure on bed occupancy, immediate induction of labour should be considered, while peripheral units should consider conservative management before referral of patients.

摘要

目的

确定妊娠34周后胎膜早破患者的最佳处理方式。

设计

一项前瞻性随机对照试验,比较即刻引产与24 - 48小时后延迟引产。

地点

开普敦泰格堡医院。

参与者

1991年7月至10月间在泰格堡医院就诊的70例连续的胎膜早破患者。

主要观察指标

比较两组母亲和婴儿的感染发病率及抗生素使用情况、住院天数、剖宫产率、产程及镇痛需求。

结果

两组母亲或婴儿的感染发病率、产程或剖宫产率无差异。延迟引产组9例(26%)患者在分娩期间需要镇痛治疗,而即刻引产组为18例(52%)(P = 0.049;比值比 = 0.327;95%置信区间 = 0.014 - 0.0998)。在延迟引产组中,74%的患者在保守治疗期间自然临产。积极引产组(即刻引产)患者入院48小时内出院的几率在统计学上显著更高(P = 0.028;比值比 = 3.34;95%置信区间 = 1.12 - 10.73)。

结论

妊娠34周后胎膜早破患者的处理应根据特定单位可提供的产前和新生儿护理水平来决定。在有足够新生儿支持且床位紧张的情况下,应考虑即刻引产,而基层单位在转诊患者前应考虑保守治疗。

相似文献

1
Management of premature rupture of the membranes after 34 weeks' gestation -- early versus delayed induction of labour.孕34周后胎膜早破的处理——早期与延迟引产
S Afr Med J. 1996 Mar;86(3):264-8.
2
Spontaneous pre-labour rupture of membranes at term: immediate versus delayed induction of labour.足月胎膜早破:即刻引产与延迟引产
West Afr J Med. 2009 May;28(3):156-60. doi: 10.4314/wajm.v28i3.48439.
3
Conservative management of patients with premature rupture of fetal membranes.胎膜早破患者的保守治疗
Obstet Gynecol. 1982 May;59(5):607-10.
4
Prelabour rupture of the membranes at term--no advantage of delaying induction for 24 hours.足月胎膜早破——延迟引产24小时并无益处。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Aug;39(3):291-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1999.tb03399.x.
5
[Premature rupture of the fetal membranes--an active or expectant approach in management of this obstetrical problem].
Med Pregl. 1998 Jul-Aug;51(7-8):346-9.
6
Conservative management of preterm premature rupture of membranes beyond 32 weeks' gestation: is it worthwhile?孕32周后胎膜早破的保守治疗:是否值得?
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;35(6):585-90. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2014.990432. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
7
Obstetric performance, perinatal outcome and risk of infection to the newborn in spontaneous and artificial rupture of membranes during labour.分娩期间自然破膜与人工破膜的产科表现、围产期结局及新生儿感染风险
Ceylon Med J. 1998 Mar;43(1):11-5.
8
Misoprostol versus expectant management in premature rupture of membranes at term.足月胎膜早破时米索前列醇与期待疗法的比较
BJOG. 2005 Sep;112(9):1284-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00700.x.
9
Premature rupture of the membranes at term. A comparison of induced and spontaneous labors.
J Reprod Med. 1982 Jan;27(1):29-33.
10
Optimal timing of labor induction after prelabor rupture of membranes at term: a secondary analysis of the TERMPROM study.足月胎膜早破后引产的最佳时机:TERMPROM 研究的二次分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Mar;228(3):326.e1-326.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.09.018. Epub 2022 Sep 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Planned early birth versus expectant management for women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes prior to 37 weeks' gestation for improving pregnancy outcome.对于妊娠37周前胎膜早破的孕妇,计划早产与期待治疗以改善妊娠结局的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 3;3(3):CD004735. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004735.pub4.
2
Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks or more).足月(37周及以上)胎膜早破时计划早产与期待治疗(等待)的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 4;1(1):CD005302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005302.pub3.