Suppr超能文献

无菌与非无菌尿道插管的随机研究。

Randomised study of sterile versus non-sterile urethral catheterisation.

作者信息

Carapeti E A, Andrews S M, Bentley P G

机构信息

Kent and Sussex Hospital, Tunbridge Wells, Kent.

出版信息

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1996 Jan;78(1):59-60.

Abstract

Indwelling urethral catheters are the most common cause of urinary tract infections (UTI), yet there is no direct evidence that technique of catheter insertion affects this. In a prospective study, 156 patients underwent preoperative urethral catheterisation, randomly allocated to 'sterile' or 'clean/non-sterile' technique groups. There was no statistical difference between the two groups with respect to the incidence of UTI. There was a considerable cost difference between the two groups, the 'sterile' method being over twice as expensive as the 'clean' method. Strict sterility is not necessary in preoperative short-term urethral catheterisation and is more expensive and time consuming.

摘要

留置导尿管是尿路感染(UTI)最常见的原因,但尚无直接证据表明导尿管插入技术会对此产生影响。在一项前瞻性研究中,156例患者接受了术前尿道插管,随机分为“无菌”或“清洁/非无菌”技术组。两组在UTI发生率方面无统计学差异。两组之间存在相当大的成本差异,“无菌”方法的成本是“清洁”方法的两倍多。术前短期尿道插管无需严格无菌操作,且成本更高、耗时更长。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验