Bell J M, Bassey E J
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Br J Sports Med. 1996 Mar;30(1):48-52. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.30.1.48.
To establish the accuracy of the traditional method of measuring the intensity of exercise in aerobic dance classes, that is, intermittent pulse palpation performed during a brief cessation of activity.
A short wave telemetry system was used to record heart rates during a class in a group of 12 healthy women aged 26 (SD 6) years. Subjects palpated their pulses for 10 s following high and low intensity exercise [78(8)% and 69(9)% of mean predicted maximum heart rate respectively]. Recorded exercising heart rates, averaged over 60 s preceding pulse palpation [ExHR(rec)], were compared with the recorded postexercise heart rates averaged over the 10 s palpation period [PostExHR(rec)] and with the palpated counts (PalpHR). Differences were assessed using Student's t test and Wilcoxon signed rank test.
Differences between ExHR(rec) and PostExHR(rec) following high and low intensity exercise [3(6) beats.min-1 and 5(7) beats.min-1 respectively] were not significant. However, the wide variation between subjects means that a postexercise heart rate is unreliable as a measure of individual exercise intensity. PalpHR was significantly lower than ExHR(rec) (P < 0.01). Every individually palpated count underestimated the exercising heart rate (range 9 to 95 beats.min-1).
While postexercise heart rate adequately represents the exercise heart rate for a group, the individual variation is too wide for this to be a useful measurement.
确定有氧舞蹈课中传统运动强度测量方法(即在短暂活动停止期间进行间歇性脉搏触诊)的准确性。
使用短波遥测系统记录一组12名年龄为26(标准差6)岁的健康女性在一堂课中的心率。受试者在高强度和低强度运动后(分别为平均预测最大心率的78(8)%和69(9)%)触诊脉搏10秒。将脉搏触诊前60秒的记录运动心率[ExHR(rec)]与在10秒触诊期间平均的记录运动后心率[PostExHR(rec)]以及触诊计数(PalpHR)进行比较。使用学生t检验和Wilcoxon符号秩检验评估差异。
高强度和低强度运动后ExHR(rec)与PostExHR(rec)之间的差异[分别为3(6)次·分钟⁻¹和5(7)次·分钟⁻¹]不显著。然而,个体之间的广泛差异意味着运动后心率作为个体运动强度的测量指标并不可靠。PalpHR显著低于ExHR(rec)(P < 0.01)。每次单独的触诊计数都低估了运动心率(范围为9至95次·分钟⁻¹)。
虽然运动后心率足以代表一组人的运动心率,但个体差异过大,使其无法成为一种有用的测量方法。