Ishii A, Namimoto T, Morishita S, Saitoh R, Oguni T, Makita O, Takahashi M, Tanaka M, Okamoto M, Kaneko Y, Okamura K
Department of Radiology, Kumamoto Rousai Hospital, Yatsushiro, Japan.
Br J Radiol. 1996 Apr;69(820):296-300. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-69-820-296.
Superior mesenteric artery (SMA) aneurysms are very uncommon. They are difficult to detect until they rupture and cause hypovolaemic shock. We performed embolization in four cases of aneurysm of branches of the superior mesenteric artery, succeeding in three cases without the need for surgical treatment. In the first case, the aneurysm was excised because of migration of a microcoil into the left hepatic artery. It was not retrieved because sufficient blood flow to the liver was shown on angiography after migration and no ischaemic change of liver was detected on laparotomy. In the second case, the aneurysm arose from the anterior pancreaticoduodenal artery. In the third case, the patient had two SMA aneurysms; one had been resected at surgery, another was revealed on follow-up angiography and embolized with microcoils. The fourth patient had a jejunal artery aneurysm with extravasation; haemostasis was achieved by packing it. In all four cases, no major complications were observed in the clinical course after embolization. Microcoils were considered to be the desirable embolic material, in order to prevent post-therapeutic ischaemic change. Embolization should be the treatment of choice for SMA aneurysms, because it is less invasive and takes less time than surgical treatment.
