Gelberg L, Doblin B H, Leake B D
UCLA School of Medicine, Division of Family Medicine, Los Angeles 90095-1683, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 1996 Mar;11(3):156-62. doi: 10.1007/BF02600268.
The homeless are more likely than other poor and vulnerable populations to manifest serious health problems. Early research focused on needs assessments of this population; current work has shifted to examine issues of access, use of health services, and barriers to care. However, current research has not examined whether model clinics designed for the homeless have created parity with their low-income domiciled peers in terms of provision of ambulatory services. Such data are increasingly in demand as managed care looms just over the political horizon as a means of providing services to low-income patients.
A major community ambulatory health center in West Los Angeles.
Homeless (N = 210) and low-income domiciled (N = 250) patients.
A medical record review of care provided over a one-year period to homeless and low-income domiciled adult patients in a major community ambulatory health center in West Lost Angeles was conducted. Data were collected on length of visits, laboratory tests, procedures, and services, immunizations, specialty clinic referrals, medications, and travel vouchers.
On average, homeless patients were provided with as many outside laboratory tests per patient as low-income domiciled patients (1.1 vs 1.3). Further, they returned for more visits (3.4 vs 2.9), were more likely to have had longer visits (88% vs 61%), and were provided with more laboratory tests (2.3 vs 1.7), procedures and services (3.1 vs 1.1), referrals (1.3 vs 0.7), medications (4.4 vs 3.3), and travel vouchers (0.6 vs 0.2) (all p < .01). Many of the procedures and services received by the homeless were for nonmedical assistance. Preventive health services such as tuberculosis skin tests, sexually transmitted disease (STD) screening, and Pap tests were provided to both homeless and domiciled patients at low rates.
Findings from this study on the provision of care in a major West Los Angeles community health center indicate that homeless patients receiving care from a model program designed to address their special needs will return for follow-up visits and will utilize services at least as much as low-income domiciled patients.
无家可归者比其他贫困和弱势群体更易出现严重的健康问题。早期研究聚焦于对该群体的需求评估;当前的工作已转向考察医疗服务的可及性、使用情况及就医障碍。然而,目前的研究尚未探讨为无家可归者设计的示范诊所与有住所的低收入同龄人在提供门诊服务方面是否实现了均等。随着管理式医疗作为为低收入患者提供服务的一种方式即将出现在政治视野中,此类数据的需求日益增加。
西洛杉矶的一家大型社区门诊健康中心。
无家可归者(N = 210)和有住所的低收入者(N = 250)。
对西洛杉矶一家大型社区门诊健康中心在一年时间里为无家可归和有住所的低收入成年患者提供的护理进行病历审查。收集了就诊时长、实验室检查、诊疗程序及服务、免疫接种、专科门诊转诊、药物及交通代金券等数据。
平均而言,无家可归患者每人接受的外部实验室检查次数与有住所的低收入患者相同(1.1次对1.3次)。此外,他们复诊次数更多(3.4次对2.9次),更有可能有较长的就诊时间(88%对61%),接受的实验室检查更多(2.3次对1.7次)、诊疗程序及服务更多(3.1次对1.1次)、转诊更多(1.3次对0.7次)、药物更多(4.4种对3.3种)以及交通代金券更多(0.6张对0.2张)(所有p < 0.01)。无家可归者接受的许多诊疗程序及服务是用于非医疗援助。无家可归者和有住所的患者接受结核病皮肤测试、性传播疾病(STD)筛查和巴氏试验等预防性健康服务的比例都很低。
这项关于西洛杉矶一家大型社区健康中心护理情况的研究结果表明,接受旨在满足其特殊需求的示范项目护理的无家可归患者会复诊,并且至少会与有住所的低收入患者一样多地利用医疗服务。