Macan T H
Department of Psychology, University of Missouri-St. Louis 63121-4499, USA.
J Psychol. 1996 May;130(3):229-36. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1996.9915004.
This quasi-experimental field study examined the effects of a time-management training program on 44 employees' self-reports of time-management behavior control over their time, job satisfaction, and stress responses, and on supervisor's ratings of these employees' job performance. Contrary to expectations, respondents did not report more frequent use of time-management behaviors, more job satisfaction, or less job-induced tension after training, compared with those not receiving training. Job performance did not significantly change after training. The training-group participants' perceptions of control over time, however, increased 4 to 5 months after training, approaching the level maintained by the no-training group. Thus, in general, the assertions made about time management were not supported.
这项准实验性实地研究考察了一项时间管理培训计划对44名员工的影响,这些影响包括员工对自身时间管理行为、时间掌控、工作满意度和压力反应的自我报告,以及上级对这些员工工作表现的评级。与预期相反,与未接受培训的员工相比,接受培训的员工在培训后并未报告更频繁地使用时间管理行为、更高的工作满意度或更低的工作压力。培训后工作表现没有显著变化。然而,培训组参与者对时间掌控的认知在培训后4至5个月有所增加,接近未培训组保持的水平。因此,总体而言,关于时间管理的论断未得到支持。