• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉内膜切除术的结果分析:再狭窄的发生率及自然病程。

An outcome analysis of carotid endarterectomy: the incidence and natural history of recurrent stenosis.

作者信息

Carballo R E, Towne J B, Seabrook G R, Freischlag J A, Cambria R A

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee 53226, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 1996 May;23(5):749-53; discussion 753-4. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(96)70236-7.

DOI:10.1016/s0741-5214(96)70236-7
PMID:8667495
Abstract

PURPOSE

This report identifies the incidence of recurrent carotid stenosis after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and records the natural history of the disease process to gain further insight into its proper management.

METHODS

A prospective surveillance protocol with duplex imaging and velocity spectral analysis was used to detect recurrent stenosis ( > 50% diameter reduction) and to document the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent CEA. Between 1984 and 1993, 619 consecutive CEAs were performed in 587 patients.

RESULTS

Recurrent carotid stenosis developed in 48 CEA sites (7.8%) during a mean follow-up interval of 34 months (range, 2 to 118 months). Normal results on intraoperative assessment correlated with a 5.6% incidence of recurrent stenosis, compared with a 19% incidence when a residual hemodynamic abnormality was present (p < 0.0003). In the first year after surgery, there were no transient ischemic attacks, strokes, or carotid occlusions from recurrent stenosis, compared with a 27% morbidity rate in later follow-up (p < 0.01). Three patients with recurrent stenosis subsequently had occlusion at the CEA site, two of whom had severe ipsilateral strokes.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of recurrent carotid stenosis is low. Patients are at significant risk for neurologic morbidity when a recurrent stenosis occludes. With a 0.3% incidence of late stroke resulting from carotid bifurcation disease, these data confirm that CEA does provide long-term protection from stroke.

摘要

目的

本报告确定颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后复发性颈动脉狭窄的发生率,并记录疾病进程的自然史,以进一步深入了解其合理管理。

方法

采用双功成像和速度频谱分析的前瞻性监测方案来检测复发性狭窄(直径减少>50%),并记录接受CEA患者的临床结果。1984年至1993年期间,对587例患者连续进行了619次CEA。

结果

在平均34个月(范围2至118个月)的随访期间,48个CEA部位(7.8%)出现了复发性颈动脉狭窄。术中评估结果正常与复发性狭窄发生率5.6%相关,而存在残余血流动力学异常时发生率为19%(p<0.0003)。术后第一年,未出现因复发性狭窄导致的短暂性脑缺血发作、中风或颈动脉闭塞,而在后期随访中发病率为27%(p<0.01)。3例复发性狭窄患者随后在CEA部位出现闭塞,其中2例发生严重的同侧中风。

结论

复发性颈动脉狭窄的发生率较低。当复发性狭窄闭塞时,患者有发生神经功能障碍的重大风险。由于颈动脉分叉疾病导致的晚期中风发生率为0.3%,这些数据证实CEA确实能提供长期的中风预防作用。

相似文献

1
An outcome analysis of carotid endarterectomy: the incidence and natural history of recurrent stenosis.颈动脉内膜切除术的结果分析:再狭窄的发生率及自然病程。
J Vasc Surg. 1996 May;23(5):749-53; discussion 753-4. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(96)70236-7.
2
Routine surveillance after carotid endarterectomy: does it affect clinical management?颈动脉内膜切除术后的常规监测:它会影响临床管理吗?
J Vasc Surg. 1993 May;17(5):819-30; discussion 830-1.
3
The importance of intraoperative detection of residual flow abnormalities after carotid artery endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术后术中检测残余血流异常的重要性。
J Vasc Surg. 1993 May;17(5):912-22; discussion 922-3. doi: 10.1067/mva.1993.44844.
4
A rational algorithm for duplex scan surveillance after carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术后双功超声监测的合理算法。
J Vasc Surg. 1999 Sep;30(3):453-60. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(99)70072-8.
5
Carotid endarterectomy: operative risks, recurrent stenosis, and long-term stroke rates in a modern series.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1992 Jul-Aug;33(4):387-400.
6
Risk of stroke, transient ischemic attack, and vessel occlusion before endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis.有症状的重度颈动脉狭窄患者在进行动脉内膜切除术之前发生中风、短暂性脑缺血发作和血管闭塞的风险。
Stroke. 2002 Apr;33(4):1057-62. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000013671.70986.39.
7
Prospective randomized trial of carotid endarterectomy with primary closure and patch angioplasty with saphenous vein, jugular vein, and polytetrafluoroethylene: long-term follow-up.采用一期缝合、大隐静脉、颈静脉及聚四氟乙烯补片血管成形术行颈动脉内膜切除术的前瞻性随机试验:长期随访
J Vasc Surg. 1998 Feb;27(2):222-32; discussion 233-4. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(98)70353-2.
8
Routine early postoperative duplex scanning is unnecessary following uncomplicated carotid endarterectomy.对于未发生并发症的颈动脉内膜切除术,术后常规进行早期双功超声扫描并无必要。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2002 Mar-Apr;36(2):115-22. doi: 10.1177/153857440203600206.
9
Intraoperative duplex scanning reduces both residual stenosis and postoperative morbidity of carotid endarterectomy.术中双功扫描可降低颈动脉内膜切除术的残余狭窄率和术后发病率。
Am Surg. 1997 Jan;63(1):50-4.
10
Use of intraoperative duplex ultrasonography and routine patch angioplasty in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.在接受颈动脉内膜切除术的患者中使用术中双功超声检查和常规补片血管成形术。
Mayo Clin Proc. 1999 Sep;74(9):870-6. doi: 10.4065/74.9.870.

引用本文的文献

1
[Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of the carotid artery].[颈动脉的超声造影成像]
Radiologe. 2011 Jun;51(6):483-9. doi: 10.1007/s00117-010-2102-x.
2
Carotid artery interventions for restenosis after prior stenting: is it different from interventions of de novo lesions? Results from the carotid artery stent (CAS)--registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK).颈动脉支架置入术后再狭窄的介入治疗:与新发病变的介入治疗有何不同?来自 Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte(ALKK)的颈动脉支架(CAS)登记研究的结果。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2010 Dec;99(12):809-15. doi: 10.1007/s00392-010-0188-9. Epub 2010 Jul 2.
3
High rate of restenosis after carotid artery stenting in patients with high-grade internal carotid artery stenosis. Medium-term follow-up.
重度颈内动脉狭窄患者行颈动脉支架置入术后再狭窄率高。中期随访。
J Neurol. 2008 Sep;255(9):1309-14. doi: 10.1007/s00415-008-0875-x. Epub 2008 Sep 24.
4
Carotid angioplasty and stent placement for restenosis after endarterectomy.颈动脉血管成形术及支架置入术治疗内膜剥脱术后再狭窄
Neuroradiology. 2007 Apr;49(4):357-64. doi: 10.1007/s00234-006-0206-9. Epub 2007 Jan 17.
5
Carotid endarterectomy at the millennium: what interventional therapy must match.千禧年的颈动脉内膜切除术:介入治疗必须与之匹配的内容。
Ann Surg. 2004 Sep;240(3):535-44; discussion 544-6. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000137142.26925.3c.
6
Carotid endarterectomy by eversion technique: its safety and durability.外翻技术行颈动脉内膜切除术:其安全性与持久性
Ann Surg. 1998 Oct;228(4):471-8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199810000-00004.
7
Carotid angioplasty and stenting. Will they match the gold standard?颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术。它们能与金标准相媲美吗?
Tex Heart Inst J. 1998;25(1):1-9.
8
Sites of recurrence and long-term results of redo surgery.再次手术的复发部位及长期结果。
Ann Surg. 1997 May;225(5):512-5; discussion 516-7. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199705000-00008.