• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术。它们能与金标准相媲美吗？

Carotid angioplasty and stenting. Will they match the gold standard?

作者信息

Diethrich E B

机构信息

Arizona Heart Institute, Phoenix, Arizona 85006, USA.

出版信息

Tex Heart Inst J. 1998;25(1):1-9.

PMID:9566056
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC325494/
Abstract

Technological advances in endoluminal equipment have changed treatment strategies for vascular disease. While the successful results of intervention in the subclavian and innominate arteries are well documented, our experience in the carotid arterial region is still in the early stages, and we are mindful of the potential for neurologic complications. We now find ourselves in the position of comparing the results of endovascular intervention with those of what has become a classic, "gold standard" procedure, carotid endarterectomy. Although we have yet to determine definitively the superiority of one method over another, it has become clear that some carotid lesions are considerably more amenable to endovascular treatment than others. We must evaluate the type and location of lesions, as well as the technical features of carotid angioplasty and stent placement, when we compare the results of endovascular and open procedures.

摘要

腔内设备的技术进步改变了血管疾病的治疗策略。虽然锁骨下动脉和无名动脉介入治疗的成功结果已有充分记录，但我们在颈动脉区域的经验仍处于早期阶段，并且我们意识到存在神经并发症的可能性。我们现在发现自己处于将血管内介入治疗的结果与已成为经典“金标准”手术的颈动脉内膜切除术的结果进行比较的境地。尽管我们尚未最终确定一种方法优于另一种方法，但已经很清楚的是，某些颈动脉病变比其他病变更适合血管内治疗。在比较血管内手术和开放手术的结果时，我们必须评估病变的类型和位置，以及颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入的技术特点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fc0/325494/66b4a36f1a09/thij00020-0017-f.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fc0/325494/bd3f8543dc5c/thij00020-0012-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fc0/325494/55e7b82bfe5e/thij00020-0013-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fc0/325494/b12bc39d9fa0/thij00020-0014-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fc0/325494/8291f21d2233/thij00020-0014-b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fc0/325494/2d937806b0dd/thij00020-0015-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fc0/325494/cf47a2396214/thij00020-0016-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fc0/325494/97efbc821e0c/thij00020-0017-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fc0/325494/4e9fd90589ea/thij00020-0017-b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fc0/325494/08cea56b3373/thij00020-0017-c.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fc0/325494/fc6a751b1371/thij00020-0017-d.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fc0/325494/d7639701b08f/thij00020-0017-e.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fc0/325494/66b4a36f1a09/thij00020-0017-f.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fc0/325494/bd3f8543dc5c/thij00020-0012-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fc0/325494/55e7b82bfe5e/thij00020-0013-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fc0/325494/b12bc39d9fa0/thij00020-0014-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fc0/325494/8291f21d2233/thij00020-0014-b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fc0/325494/2d937806b0dd/thij00020-0015-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fc0/325494/cf47a2396214/thij00020-0016-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fc0/325494/97efbc821e0c/thij00020-0017-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fc0/325494/4e9fd90589ea/thij00020-0017-b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fc0/325494/08cea56b3373/thij00020-0017-c.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fc0/325494/fc6a751b1371/thij00020-0017-d.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fc0/325494/d7639701b08f/thij00020-0017-e.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fc0/325494/66b4a36f1a09/thij00020-0017-f.jpg

相似文献

1
Carotid angioplasty and stenting. Will they match the gold standard?颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术。它们能与金标准相媲美吗？
Tex Heart Inst J. 1998;25(1):1-9.
2
[Carotid endarterectomy versus stenting: where do we stand today?].[颈动脉内膜切除术与支架置入术：我们如今处于什么状况？]
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2012 Oct;40(7):642-9. doi: 10.5543/tkda.2012.44969.
3
Intraoperative innominate and common carotid intervention combined with carotid endarterectomy: a "true" endovascular surgical approach.术中无名动脉和颈总动脉介入联合颈动脉内膜切除术：一种“真正的”血管内手术方法。
J Endovasc Ther. 2004 Jun;11(3):258-62. doi: 10.1583/03-1119.1.
4
[Endovascular treatment of arteries with cerebral destination: failures and limits].[脑血管靶向动脉的血管内治疗：失败与局限]
J Mal Vasc. 1996;21 Suppl A:123-31.
5
Carotid angioplasty and stenting is safe and effective for treatment of recurrent stenosis after eversion endarterectomy.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术对于外翻式内膜切除术术后复发性狭窄的治疗是安全有效的。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Sep;60(3):645-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.288. Epub 2014 May 1.
6
A meta-analysis of combined endarterectomy and proximal balloon angioplasty for tandem disease of the arch vessels and carotid bifurcation.一项关于主动脉弓部血管和颈动脉分叉部串联病变行颈动脉内膜切除术联合近端球囊血管成形术的荟萃分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Aug;54(2):534-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.04.022.
7
Carotid artery stenting in a single center: are six years of experience enough to achieve the standard of care?单中心的颈动脉支架置入术：六年的经验足以达到护理标准吗？
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007 Dec;34(6):655-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.07.008. Epub 2007 Sep 20.
8
Hybrid procedures for the treatment of multi-focal ipsilateral internal carotid and proximal common carotid or innominate artery lesions.用于治疗多灶性同侧颈内动脉及近端颈总动脉或无名动脉病变的杂交手术。
Vasa. 2011 May;40(3):241-5. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000099.
9
Carotid endarterectomy with simultaneous retrograde common carotid artery stenting: technical considerations.同期逆行颈总动脉支架置入术的颈动脉内膜切除术：技术要点
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Dec 1;72(7):1003-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21730.
10
Carotid endarterectomy: the gold standard.颈动脉内膜切除术：金标准。
J Endovasc Surg. 1996 Feb;3(1):10-5. doi: 10.1177/152660289600300106.

本文引用的文献

1
Carotid endarterectomy for recurrent stenosis.复发性狭窄的颈动脉内膜切除术。
J Vasc Surg. 1997 May;25(5):877-83. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(97)70217-9.
2
The relative effect of carotid plaque heterogeneity and echogenicity on ipsilateral cerebral infarction and symptoms of cerebrovascular disease.颈动脉斑块异质性和回声性对同侧脑梗死及脑血管疾病症状的相对影响。
Int Angiol. 1996 Dec;15(4):300-6.
3
Percutaneous techniques for endoluminal carotid interventions.用于腔内颈动脉介入治疗的经皮技术。
J Endovasc Surg. 1996 May;3(2):182-202. doi: 10.1583/1074-6218(1996)003<0182:PTFECI>2.0.CO;2.
4
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of supra-aortic vessels.
J Endovasc Surg. 1996 May;3(2):171-81. doi: 10.1177/152660289600300209.
5
Recurrent carotid disease: optimum technique for redo surgery.复发性颈动脉疾病：再次手术的最佳技术。
J Endovasc Surg. 1996 Feb;3(1):69-75. doi: 10.1583/1074-6218(1996)003<0069:RCDOTF>2.0.CO;2.
6
An outcome analysis of carotid endarterectomy: the incidence and natural history of recurrent stenosis.颈动脉内膜切除术的结果分析：再狭窄的发生率及自然病程。
J Vasc Surg. 1996 May;23(5):749-53; discussion 753-4. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(96)70236-7.
7
Long-term follow-up of patients undergoing reoperation for recurrent carotid artery disease.复发性颈动脉疾病再次手术患者的长期随访
J Vasc Surg. 1993 Dec;18(6):991-8; discussion 999-1001.
8
Reoperative approaches for carotid restenosis.颈动脉再狭窄的再次手术入路
Semin Vasc Surg. 1994 Sep;7(3):195-200.
9
Computer-assisted carotid plaque characterisation.计算机辅助颈动脉斑块特征分析。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1995 May;9(4):389-93. doi: 10.1016/s1078-5884(05)80005-x.
10
Mandibular subluxation for high carotid exposure.
J Vasc Surg. 1984 Nov;1(6):727-33.