Diethrich E B
Arizona Heart Institute, Phoenix, Arizona 85006, USA.
Tex Heart Inst J. 1998;25(1):1-9.
Technological advances in endoluminal equipment have changed treatment strategies for vascular disease. While the successful results of intervention in the subclavian and innominate arteries are well documented, our experience in the carotid arterial region is still in the early stages, and we are mindful of the potential for neurologic complications. We now find ourselves in the position of comparing the results of endovascular intervention with those of what has become a classic, "gold standard" procedure, carotid endarterectomy. Although we have yet to determine definitively the superiority of one method over another, it has become clear that some carotid lesions are considerably more amenable to endovascular treatment than others. We must evaluate the type and location of lesions, as well as the technical features of carotid angioplasty and stent placement, when we compare the results of endovascular and open procedures.
腔内设备的技术进步改变了血管疾病的治疗策略。虽然锁骨下动脉和无名动脉介入治疗的成功结果已有充分记录,但我们在颈动脉区域的经验仍处于早期阶段,并且我们意识到存在神经并发症的可能性。我们现在发现自己处于将血管内介入治疗的结果与已成为经典“金标准”手术的颈动脉内膜切除术的结果进行比较的境地。尽管我们尚未最终确定一种方法优于另一种方法,但已经很清楚的是,某些颈动脉病变比其他病变更适合血管内治疗。在比较血管内手术和开放手术的结果时,我们必须评估病变的类型和位置,以及颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入的技术特点。