Suppr超能文献

医生对安乐死和协助自杀的意愿:医生会言行一致吗?

Physician desire for euthanasia and assisted suicide: would physicians practice what they preach?

作者信息

Howard O M, Fairclough D L, Daniels E R, Emanuel E J

机构信息

Division of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 1997 Feb;15(2):428-32. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.2.428.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Euthanasia is a pressing public issue. We sought to assess how frequently physicians could perceive of a desire for euthanasia themselves and whether they would be willing to provide patients the same interventions.

METHODS

We interviewed 355 randomly selected oncologists from the United States and interviewed them about their attitudes and practices related to euthanasia and assisted suicide.

RESULTS

Of the 355 oncologists, 48.1% could imagine a situation in which they might desire euthanasia or assisted suicide for themselves. Oncologists who were Catholic and more religious were significantly less likely to desire these interventions for themselves. Of those oncologists who could imagine a situation in which they might desire euthanasia or assisted suicide for themselves, 85.8% found euthanasia and/or assisted suicide acceptable for their patients. Of the oncologists who could not imagine a situation in which they might desire euthanasia or assisted suicide for themselves, 41.7% still found these interventions ethical for their patients. Only 6.8% of oncologists could imagine a situation in which they might desire euthanasia or assisted suicide for themselves but found these interventions unacceptable for their patients.

CONCLUSION

Almost half of surveyed oncologists could imagine a situation in which they would desire euthanasia or assisted suicide. However, in many cases, this was for nonterminal illness which would be prohibited by proposed laws. When physicians desire euthanasia or assisted suicide for themselves, they are willing to provide these interventions for their patients; therefore, most physicians would practice what they preach. Indeed, when they deviate, oncologists overwhelmingly respect patient autonomy rather than impose their own views on patients.

摘要

目的

安乐死是一个紧迫的公共问题。我们试图评估医生能多频繁地察觉到自己有安乐死的意愿,以及他们是否愿意为患者提供同样的干预措施。

方法

我们随机采访了355名来自美国的肿瘤学家,询问他们对安乐死和协助自杀的态度及做法。

结果

在355名肿瘤学家中,48.1%能想象出自己可能希望接受安乐死或协助自杀的情形。天主教徒且宗教信仰更强的肿瘤学家明显不太可能希望自己接受这些干预措施。在那些能想象出自己可能希望接受安乐死或协助自杀情形的肿瘤学家中,85.8%认为安乐死和/或协助自杀对他们的患者来说是可以接受的。在那些无法想象自己可能希望接受安乐死或协助自杀情形的肿瘤学家中,41.7%仍然认为这些干预措施对他们的患者来说是符合伦理的。只有6.8%的肿瘤学家能想象出自己可能希望接受安乐死或协助自杀的情形,但却认为这些干预措施对他们的患者来说是不可接受的。

结论

几乎一半接受调查的肿瘤学家能想象出自己希望接受安乐死或协助自杀的情形。然而,在很多情况下,这是针对拟议法律所禁止的非终末期疾病。当医生自己希望接受安乐死或协助自杀时,他们愿意为患者提供这些干预措施;因此,大多数医生会言行一致。事实上,当他们有不同意见时,肿瘤学家绝大多数尊重患者的自主权,而不是将自己的观点强加给患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验